COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes and Vaccine Efficacy among Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Sarah Gillaspie, M. Hoffmann
{"title":"COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes and Vaccine Efficacy among Patients with Hematologic Malignancies","authors":"Sarah Gillaspie, M. Hoffmann","doi":"10.33696/immunology.3.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic places the treating hematologist in a quandary: how best to protect patients with hematologic malignancies from potentially deadly COVID-19 infection while also providing the best therapy for their disease and maximizing opportunities for cure. Cancer patients as a whole trend toward more severe infection and increased mortality from COVID-19 infection. This burden, however, is not equally distributed among all cancer patients and outcomes are particularly poor in those with hematologic malignancies [1]. Lymphodepleting treatments have a profound effect on COVID outcomes; we have recently reported that despite proper and even prolonged quarantine after asymptomatic positive screening test for COVID-19, the initiation of rituximab-based chemotherapy resulted in a delayed respiratory failure in three lymphoma patients [2]. In addition to more severe infection and increased mortality, immunocompromised patients shed virus and remain infectious for far longer than the general population, frequently for several months or longer [3,4]. Finally, to add insult to injury, patients with hematologic malignancies have worse clinical and laboratory responses to vaccines, compromising their ability to be protected against infection and severe disease [5,6]. Prolonged viral shedding, decreased ability to form a durable immune response to vaccination or infection, and subsequent increased probability for severe infection pose a problem for those needing treatment due to progressive disease. Treatment delays in some cases can reduce cure fractions and increase likelihood of disease-related complications. With these cases in mind, there is a need to identify those patients who are at greatest risk of severe infection and determine what steps can we take to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with both COVID-19 and the hematologic malignancy.","PeriodicalId":73644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cellular immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cellular immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/immunology.3.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic places the treating hematologist in a quandary: how best to protect patients with hematologic malignancies from potentially deadly COVID-19 infection while also providing the best therapy for their disease and maximizing opportunities for cure. Cancer patients as a whole trend toward more severe infection and increased mortality from COVID-19 infection. This burden, however, is not equally distributed among all cancer patients and outcomes are particularly poor in those with hematologic malignancies [1]. Lymphodepleting treatments have a profound effect on COVID outcomes; we have recently reported that despite proper and even prolonged quarantine after asymptomatic positive screening test for COVID-19, the initiation of rituximab-based chemotherapy resulted in a delayed respiratory failure in three lymphoma patients [2]. In addition to more severe infection and increased mortality, immunocompromised patients shed virus and remain infectious for far longer than the general population, frequently for several months or longer [3,4]. Finally, to add insult to injury, patients with hematologic malignancies have worse clinical and laboratory responses to vaccines, compromising their ability to be protected against infection and severe disease [5,6]. Prolonged viral shedding, decreased ability to form a durable immune response to vaccination or infection, and subsequent increased probability for severe infection pose a problem for those needing treatment due to progressive disease. Treatment delays in some cases can reduce cure fractions and increase likelihood of disease-related complications. With these cases in mind, there is a need to identify those patients who are at greatest risk of severe infection and determine what steps can we take to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with both COVID-19 and the hematologic malignancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的临床结果和疫苗效力
2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行使治疗血液病的血液学家陷入困境:如何最好地保护血液系统恶性肿瘤患者免受潜在致命的新冠肺炎感染,同时为他们的疾病提供最佳治疗并最大限度地增加治愈机会。癌症患者总体上倾向于感染更严重,新冠肺炎感染死亡率增加。然而,这种负担并没有在所有癌症患者中平均分配,血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的预后尤其差[1]。淋巴结清除治疗对新冠肺炎的预后有着深远的影响;我们最近报告称,尽管在新冠肺炎无症状阳性筛查后进行了适当甚至长期的隔离,但开始使用利妥昔单抗化疗导致三名淋巴瘤患者出现延迟性呼吸衰竭[2]。除了更严重的感染和更高的死亡率外,免疫功能低下的患者还会脱落病毒,并比普通人群保持更长的传染性,通常会持续数月或更长时间[3,4]。最后,雪上加霜的是,血液系统恶性肿瘤患者对疫苗的临床和实验室反应更差,损害了他们抵御感染和严重疾病的能力[5,6]。病毒脱落时间延长,对疫苗接种或感染形成持久免疫反应的能力下降,以及随后严重感染的可能性增加,都给那些因疾病进展而需要治疗的人带来了问题。在某些情况下,治疗延误会降低治愈率并增加疾病相关并发症的可能性。考虑到这些病例,有必要确定那些严重感染风险最大的患者,并确定我们可以采取哪些措施来最大限度地降低与新冠肺炎和血液系统恶性肿瘤相关的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized Neoantigen DNA Cancer Vaccines: Current Status and Future Perspectives A Natural Metabolite and Inhibitor of the NLRP3 Inflammasome: 4-hydroxynonenal. The Natural History of Post-Chikungunya Viral Arthritis Disease Activity and T-cell Immunology: A Cohort Study. Essentials of CAR-T Therapy and Associated Microbial Challenges in Long Run Immunotherapy. Can Molecular Biomarkers be Utilized to Determine Appropriate Adjuvant Therapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1