Evaluating Audit Quality Using the Results of Inspection Processes Performed by an Independent Regulator

Abstract

This research adds to the audit quality literature by examining inspection findings generated by an independent regulator in an African setting. The study is concerned with the nature of weaknesses identified at both firm and engagement level, categorising inspection findings according to their possible impact on audit quality and identifying those aspects of audit practice which result in inspection findings. An exploratory research design is used. Inspection findings are reviewed and categorised with results presented graphically. Several audit quality weaknesses at the firm and engagement level are revealed. The number of audit practice deficiencies move in tandem with incidences of poor documentation standards. In addition, the frequency and impact of inspection findings are affected by: (1) the subjectivity of processes used to test balances and transactions; (2) the extent to which applicable standards are principles-based rather than procedural; and (3) the need to develop tailored test procedures to address relevant risks. At the practical level, the findings are important for engagement leaders, regulators, audit committees and investors interested in understanding better those aspects of audit practice which are likely to result in lower-quality audits and less reliable audit reports. At the empirical level, the study provides an original review of audit quality inspection findings from a novel setting. An exploratory design complements the largely positivist-inspired research on audit quality and examines a practice-focused perspective on audit quality which moves away from inferential testing of quality surrogates.