Soil aggregate stability quantified by different methods is unaffected by rice straw biochar in the long term

Peter Bilson Obour, Eric Oppong Danso, Selorm Y. Dorvlo, Emmanuel Arthur
{"title":"Soil aggregate stability quantified by different methods is unaffected by rice straw biochar in the long term","authors":"Peter Bilson Obour,&nbsp;Eric Oppong Danso,&nbsp;Selorm Y. Dorvlo,&nbsp;Emmanuel Arthur","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Highly weathered tropical soils are susceptible to disaggregation due to disruptive forces like water and mechanical disturbances. However, a few studies have investigated how biochar and cropping systems together affect the aggregate stability of tropical soils. This study investigated the long-term (∼7 years) effect of rice straw biochar on the aggregate stability of a tropical Acrisol using the dry aggregate stability (DAS) method and SLAKES (a wet aggregate stability technique), and assessed the extent of agreement or otherwise of the aggregate stability quantified by the two methods for different treatments. Maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and okra (<i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i> L.) were rotated on plots amended with rice straw biochar at rates of 0, 15, and 30 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Seven years after biochar amendment, bulk soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm depth for laboratory analyses. Aggregate stability was assessed by determining erodible fraction (EF) and DAS, and by quantifying the SLAKES parameters (slaking index [SI] and slaking index at 600 seconds [SI-600]). Neither biochar nor crop type or their interaction significantly changed the soil aggregate stability assessed by the two methods (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The EF and DAS weakly correlated with SI and SI-600, which could be attributed to the differences in the mechanisms underlying soil aggregate breakdown assessed by the two methods. The study highlighted that observed challenges of the SLAKES method namely, inability in some cases to detect soil aggregates and the disaggregation process could offset its advantages as a tool for rapid detection of soil structural problem areas within agricultural fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 5","pages":"1018-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highly weathered tropical soils are susceptible to disaggregation due to disruptive forces like water and mechanical disturbances. However, a few studies have investigated how biochar and cropping systems together affect the aggregate stability of tropical soils. This study investigated the long-term (∼7 years) effect of rice straw biochar on the aggregate stability of a tropical Acrisol using the dry aggregate stability (DAS) method and SLAKES (a wet aggregate stability technique), and assessed the extent of agreement or otherwise of the aggregate stability quantified by the two methods for different treatments. Maize (Zea mays L.) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) were rotated on plots amended with rice straw biochar at rates of 0, 15, and 30 Mg ha−1. Seven years after biochar amendment, bulk soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm depth for laboratory analyses. Aggregate stability was assessed by determining erodible fraction (EF) and DAS, and by quantifying the SLAKES parameters (slaking index [SI] and slaking index at 600 seconds [SI-600]). Neither biochar nor crop type or their interaction significantly changed the soil aggregate stability assessed by the two methods (p > 0.05). The EF and DAS weakly correlated with SI and SI-600, which could be attributed to the differences in the mechanisms underlying soil aggregate breakdown assessed by the two methods. The study highlighted that observed challenges of the SLAKES method namely, inability in some cases to detect soil aggregates and the disaggregation process could offset its advantages as a tool for rapid detection of soil structural problem areas within agricultural fields.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同方法量化的土壤团聚体稳定性在长期内不受秸秆生物炭的影响
高度风化的热带土壤容易因水和机械扰动等破坏性力量而解体。然而,一些研究已经调查了生物炭和种植系统如何共同影响热带土壤的团聚稳定性。本研究使用干骨料稳定性(DAS)方法和湿骨料稳定性技术(SLAKES)研究了水稻秸秆生物炭对热带阿克丽索骨料稳定性的长期(~ 7年)影响,并评估了两种方法在不同处理下量化的骨料稳定性的一致程度。玉米(Zea mays L.)和秋葵(Abelmoschus esculentus L.)在秸秆生物炭添加量为0、15和30 Mg ha−1的地块上轮作。生物炭改性后7年,在0-15 cm深度处收集大量土壤样品进行实验室分析。通过测定可蚀分数(EF)和DAS,以及量化SLAKES参数(软化指数[SI]和600秒软化指数[SI-600])来评估骨料稳定性。生物炭和作物类型及其相互作用均未显著改变两种方法评估的土壤团聚体稳定性(p >;0.05)。EF和DAS与SI和SI-600呈弱相关,这可能是由于两种方法评估的土壤团聚体破碎机制存在差异。该研究强调指出,SLAKES方法所观察到的挑战,即在某些情况下无法检测土壤团聚体和分解过程,可能抵消其作为快速检测农田内土壤结构问题区域的工具的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil carbon fraction responses to grazing intensity and texture in a semiarid grassland Investigating plasticity and swelling properties of improved expansive soil designs based on hybrid deep learning optimization for high pay load applications Integrated assessment of potassium speciation in Taiwanese soils using chemical extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy Comparison of Laboratory- and field-determined soil water retention curves in a well-aggregated tallgrass prairie soil A Green-Ampt model for muddy water considering air resistance based on the layered assumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1