Characterizing the research data management practices of NIH biomedical researchers indicates the need for better support at laboratory level

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Health Information and Libraries Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-26 DOI:10.1111/hir.12433
Sue Yeon Syn PhD, Soojung Kim PhD
{"title":"Characterizing the research data management practices of NIH biomedical researchers indicates the need for better support at laboratory level","authors":"Sue Yeon Syn PhD,&nbsp;Soojung Kim PhD","doi":"10.1111/hir.12433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The study investigated the research data management (RDM) practices of biomedical researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) representing various biomedical disciplines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to analyse the state of biomedical researchers' RDM practices based on RDM practice levels (individual, laboratory, institution and external). The findings of the study are expected to provide directions to information professionals for effective RDM services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews with 11 researchers were conducted. The interviews were analysed by levels of RDM practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The findings revealed that biomedical researchers focus on storing and sharing data and that RDM is performed mainly at the individual level. There seems to be a lack of laboratory level RDM system that allows consistent RDM practices among researchers. External RDM practice is often challenged by not having one responsible for RDM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggested a need for an agreed RDM system and customized support, particularly at the laboratory level. Also, institutional support can help researchers prepare for long term data preservation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our suggestions emphasize the importance of RDM training and support for long term data preservation, especially at the laboratory level.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47580,"journal":{"name":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hir.12433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The study investigated the research data management (RDM) practices of biomedical researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) representing various biomedical disciplines.

Objectives

This study aimed to analyse the state of biomedical researchers' RDM practices based on RDM practice levels (individual, laboratory, institution and external). The findings of the study are expected to provide directions to information professionals for effective RDM services.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 11 researchers were conducted. The interviews were analysed by levels of RDM practices.

Results

The findings revealed that biomedical researchers focus on storing and sharing data and that RDM is performed mainly at the individual level. There seems to be a lack of laboratory level RDM system that allows consistent RDM practices among researchers. External RDM practice is often challenged by not having one responsible for RDM.

Discussion

Findings suggested a need for an agreed RDM system and customized support, particularly at the laboratory level. Also, institutional support can help researchers prepare for long term data preservation.

Conclusion

Our suggestions emphasize the importance of RDM training and support for long term data preservation, especially at the laboratory level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述NIH生物医学研究人员的研究数据管理实践表明需要在实验室层面提供更好的支持。
本研究调查了代表不同生物医学学科的美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)生物医学研究人员的研究数据管理(RDM)实践。目的基于RDM实践水平(个人、实验室、机构和外部)分析生物医学研究人员RDM实践的现状。研究结果可为资讯专业人士提供指引,以提供有效的RDM服务。方法对11名研究人员进行半结构化访谈。访谈通过RDM实践的水平进行分析。结果生物医学研究人员注重数据的存储和共享,RDM主要在个体层面进行。似乎缺乏实验室级别的RDM系统,使研究人员之间的RDM实践保持一致。外部RDM实践经常因为没有人负责RDM而受到挑战。讨论结果表明需要一个商定的RDM系统和定制的支持,特别是在实验室级别。此外,机构支持可以帮助研究人员为长期数据保存做好准备。结论我们的建议强调RDM培训和长期数据保存支持的重要性,特别是在实验室层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Information and Libraries Journal
Health Information and Libraries Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Health Information and Libraries Journal (HILJ) provides practitioners, researchers, and students in library and health professions an international and interdisciplinary forum. Its objectives are to encourage discussion and to disseminate developments at the frontiers of information management and libraries. A major focus is communicating practices that are evidence based both in managing information and in supporting health care. The Journal encompasses: - Identifying health information needs and uses - Managing programmes and services in the changing health environment - Information technology and applications in health - Educating and training health information professionals - Outreach to health user groups
期刊最新文献
Forthcoming papers Issue Information Core collections: Essential titles for health libraries Information and health literacy policies during pandemics: A narrative review Application-based big data development framework for health sciences libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1