Knowledge and attitudes on leprosy of healthcare workers in a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Leprosy review Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.47276/lr.93.1.26
Czarina Chavez, Miyahra Haniko P. Lopez, Christine E. De Guia, M. B. Tapales, Abelaine Venida-Tablizo
{"title":"Knowledge and attitudes on leprosy of healthcare workers in a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines","authors":"Czarina Chavez, Miyahra Haniko P. Lopez, Christine E. De Guia, M. B. Tapales, Abelaine Venida-Tablizo","doi":"10.47276/lr.93.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryBackground/Objectives The drivers of stigma may vary from one society or country to another; thus, it is necessary to identify these drivers so that stigma elimination programs would be locally relevant. This study aimed to determine the current knowledge and attitudes on leprosy of healthcare workers in a tertiary government hospitalinthePhilippineswhichwillserveasthebasisforourfutureleprosyawarenesscampaigns. Methods We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study among 265 healthcare workers in Rizal Medical Center (RMC), Philippines from January to March 2020 using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographics and study variables. Results A majority had high (36.2%) or medium (35.5%) knowledge on leprosy. A majority (62.3%) had positive attitudes towards leprosy. However, only 18.5% knew that leprosy is transmitted through inhalation and a majority thought that it is transmitted either through body fluids and secretions (52.8%) or open wounds (27.5%). Only about half knew that a patient on treatment can no longer transmit the disease and does not need to be isolated, and that a patient who has completed treatment but still exhibits manifestations of the disease can no longer transmit the disease. majority high or medium knowledge leprosy and a positive attitude towards leprosy, identified misconceptions knowledge gaps centered on its mode of transmission and transmissibility which can lead to inappropriate fear of acquiring the disease from patients.","PeriodicalId":18196,"journal":{"name":"Leprosy review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leprosy review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47276/lr.93.1.26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SummaryBackground/Objectives The drivers of stigma may vary from one society or country to another; thus, it is necessary to identify these drivers so that stigma elimination programs would be locally relevant. This study aimed to determine the current knowledge and attitudes on leprosy of healthcare workers in a tertiary government hospitalinthePhilippineswhichwillserveasthebasisforourfutureleprosyawarenesscampaigns. Methods We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study among 265 healthcare workers in Rizal Medical Center (RMC), Philippines from January to March 2020 using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographics and study variables. Results A majority had high (36.2%) or medium (35.5%) knowledge on leprosy. A majority (62.3%) had positive attitudes towards leprosy. However, only 18.5% knew that leprosy is transmitted through inhalation and a majority thought that it is transmitted either through body fluids and secretions (52.8%) or open wounds (27.5%). Only about half knew that a patient on treatment can no longer transmit the disease and does not need to be isolated, and that a patient who has completed treatment but still exhibits manifestations of the disease can no longer transmit the disease. majority high or medium knowledge leprosy and a positive attitude towards leprosy, identified misconceptions knowledge gaps centered on its mode of transmission and transmissibility which can lead to inappropriate fear of acquiring the disease from patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾一家三级政府医院医护人员对麻风病的认识和态度
背景/目标污名化的驱动因素可能因社会或国家而异;因此,有必要确定这些驱动因素,以便消除污名化计划与当地相关。这项研究旨在确定菲律宾一家三级政府医院的医护人员对麻风病的当前知识和态度,该医院将为我们未来的麻风防治运动提供基础。方法我们于2020年1月至3月在菲律宾里扎尔医疗中心(RMC)的265名医护人员中进行了一项描述性横断面研究,使用自行问卷。描述性统计用于描述人口统计和研究变量。结果多数患者对麻风病有较高(36.2%)或中等(35.5%)的认识。大多数人(62.3%)对麻风病持积极态度。然而,只有18.5%的人知道麻风病是通过吸入传播的,大多数人认为它是通过体液和分泌物传播的(52.8%)或开放性伤口传播的(27.5%)。只有大约一半的人知道接受治疗的患者不能再传播这种疾病,不需要隔离,并且已经完成治疗但仍表现出疾病表现的患者不能再传播疾病。大多数人对麻风病有较高或中等的认识,对麻风病学持积极态度,发现了以其传播方式和传播性为中心的误解和知识差距,这可能导致对从患者那里获得疾病的不适当恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leprosy review
Leprosy review 医学-病理学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Leprosy Review is an Open Access peer reviewed journal including original papers on all aspects of leprosy. Topics published include research into the medical, physical and social aspects of leprosy and information relevant to leprosy control. We publish original research, short reports, case studies and reviews. The vision of the journal is to improve the management and control of leprosy and its consequences, by publishing relevant research and sharing experiences and best practices.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of skin temperature in the hands of leprosy patients to detect peripheral autonomic dysfunction, by infrared thermography Why we need to continue to target field workers and healthcare providers at the primary level to prevent visual loss in leprosy Dapsone induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, sparing leprosy patches as an ‘anatopic’ response: A case report An uncommon manifestation of a not-so-common disease: A Sweet dilemma Money matters: Priorities in leprosy research funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1