A hostage of the Cold War: The return of the monastery treasure of Pechory

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Cultural Property Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1017/s0940739121000369
Ulrike Schmiegelt-Rietig
{"title":"A hostage of the Cold War: The return of the monastery treasure of Pechory","authors":"Ulrike Schmiegelt-Rietig","doi":"10.1017/s0940739121000369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The collection of liturgical objects of the Pechory Monastery close to the city of Pskov on Lake Peipus was deployed as a repository in Germany by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg during World War II. After the war, it was not subject to intergovernmental restitution but was stored away in the Wiesbaden Central Collecting Point and subsequently handed over to the newly founded Icon Museum of Recklinghausen before being restituted to the monastery almost two decades later. This article gives a description of the treasure itself and its history. It traces the odyssey of the treasure in Germany until its restitution and examines the different stages of its journey. The handling of this case in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) is symptomatic of the official German attitude toward National Socialist cultural loot and of the changing debates around this subject throughout the decades. These debates form a micro-history that reflects the FRG’s master narratives about World War II and its consequences, the division of Germany, and its changing, but questionable, relationship to the Soviet Union. In addition, it closely follows the political mainstream from the deep anti-Soviet attitudes of the postwar years to Chancellor Willy Brandt’s policy of détente in the 1970s, which made the restitution actually possible. The act in its entity can be seen as a typical example of Nazi Germany’s art looting in the occupied parts of Europe and of the particular conditions in Central and Eastern Europe as well as the after-war restitution policies of the Western allies and the FRG. It is nonetheless typical of the Soviet Union’s policy of denying restitutions later on, including immediate postwar restitutions as well as later acts such as the one involving the Pechory treasure, which has sometimes been repeated up to the present day.","PeriodicalId":54155,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cultural Property","volume":"28 1","pages":"447 - 463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cultural Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0940739121000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The collection of liturgical objects of the Pechory Monastery close to the city of Pskov on Lake Peipus was deployed as a repository in Germany by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg during World War II. After the war, it was not subject to intergovernmental restitution but was stored away in the Wiesbaden Central Collecting Point and subsequently handed over to the newly founded Icon Museum of Recklinghausen before being restituted to the monastery almost two decades later. This article gives a description of the treasure itself and its history. It traces the odyssey of the treasure in Germany until its restitution and examines the different stages of its journey. The handling of this case in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) is symptomatic of the official German attitude toward National Socialist cultural loot and of the changing debates around this subject throughout the decades. These debates form a micro-history that reflects the FRG’s master narratives about World War II and its consequences, the division of Germany, and its changing, but questionable, relationship to the Soviet Union. In addition, it closely follows the political mainstream from the deep anti-Soviet attitudes of the postwar years to Chancellor Willy Brandt’s policy of détente in the 1970s, which made the restitution actually possible. The act in its entity can be seen as a typical example of Nazi Germany’s art looting in the occupied parts of Europe and of the particular conditions in Central and Eastern Europe as well as the after-war restitution policies of the Western allies and the FRG. It is nonetheless typical of the Soviet Union’s policy of denying restitutions later on, including immediate postwar restitutions as well as later acts such as the one involving the Pechory treasure, which has sometimes been repeated up to the present day.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷战的人质:佩乔里修道院宝藏的回归
摘要佩普斯湖畔普斯科夫市附近的佩乔里修道院的礼拜物品收藏在第二次世界大战期间由德国帝国主义者罗森伯格作为仓库部署在德国。战后,它没有受到政府间的归还,而是被存放在威斯巴登中央收藏点,随后被移交给新成立的雷克林豪森图标博物馆,近20年后被归还给修道院。这篇文章介绍了这个宝藏本身及其历史。它追溯了宝藏在德国的奥德赛,直到归还,并考察了其旅程的不同阶段。德意志联邦共和国(FRG)对此案的处理表明了德国官方对国家社会主义文化掠夺的态度,以及几十年来围绕这一主题不断变化的辩论。这些争论形成了一部微观历史,反映了德国联邦政府对第二次世界大战及其后果、德国分裂及其与苏联不断变化但值得怀疑的关系的主要叙述。此外,它密切关注政治主流,从战后几年的深刻反苏态度到20世纪70年代总理威利·勃兰特的缓和政策,这使得归还实际上成为可能。该法案在其实体中可以被视为纳粹德国在欧洲被占领地区掠夺艺术品、中欧和东欧特殊条件以及西方盟友和德国联邦共和国战后归还政策的典型例子。尽管如此,这是苏联后来拒绝归还的典型政策,包括战后立即归还,以及后来的行为,如涉及佩奇宝藏的行为,这种行为有时会重复到今天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cultural Property
International Journal of Cultural Property HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Different Materialities – Different Authenticities? Considerations on Watercraft Exhibited in Museums Learning and Knowledge Loss: Returning Antiquities from Fordham University to Italy Are Archaeologists Talking About Looting? Reviewing Archaeological and Anthropological Conference Proceedings from 1899–2019 How to Be a ‘Good’ Collector: Some Ethical Reflections on the Private Collecting of Cultural Heritage T. rex is Fierce, T. rex is Charismatic, T. rex is Litigious: Disruptive Objects in Affective Desirescapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1