Assess, Sort, Classify: “Othering” of Indigenous Students in Manitoba’s Schools

Q4 Social Sciences Exceptionality Education International Pub Date : 2020-07-21 DOI:10.5206/EEI.V29I2.9404
N. Bartlett, Trevi B. Freeze
{"title":"Assess, Sort, Classify: “Othering” of Indigenous Students in Manitoba’s Schools","authors":"N. Bartlett, Trevi B. Freeze","doi":"10.5206/EEI.V29I2.9404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the province of Manitoba, Canada, there is a gap between the rhetoric of inclusive education and its practical implementation. In the absence of inclusive educational policies and guidelines, deficit-based approaches such as categorical labels for students who are deemed to have a severe emotional and behavioural disorder, segregated classrooms, and self-contained programs are prevalent and change is needed. This paper provides a critical perspective on how the paradigm of special education contributes to the social construction of disability; how, for Indigenous students, it too often positions behavioural difference as disability; and further, why this practice is systemically discriminatory. In our examination, we seek to expose the exclusion (Slee & Allen, 2001) that exists in nominally inclusive schools as a way to promote social change and redirect education toward truly inclusive practices. To that end, we suggest the following strategies that may reduce educational inequity for Indigenous students: (a) developing clearly articulated inclusive educational policies along with indicators of inclusivity; (b) reporting the number of Indigenous students who are identified as emotionally and behaviourally disordered, and segregated in self-contained settings; (c) establishing needs-based models of support at all levels (e.g., province, division, and school); (d) creating new narratives of assessment and pedagogy; and (e) reconceptualizing teachers’ training. We hope that by critically examining the structures and processes of special education that, in fact, disable Indigenous students from educational success, inclusion might encompass more than a provincial philosophy and include transformative educational change.","PeriodicalId":38584,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality Education International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/EEI.V29I2.9404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the province of Manitoba, Canada, there is a gap between the rhetoric of inclusive education and its practical implementation. In the absence of inclusive educational policies and guidelines, deficit-based approaches such as categorical labels for students who are deemed to have a severe emotional and behavioural disorder, segregated classrooms, and self-contained programs are prevalent and change is needed. This paper provides a critical perspective on how the paradigm of special education contributes to the social construction of disability; how, for Indigenous students, it too often positions behavioural difference as disability; and further, why this practice is systemically discriminatory. In our examination, we seek to expose the exclusion (Slee & Allen, 2001) that exists in nominally inclusive schools as a way to promote social change and redirect education toward truly inclusive practices. To that end, we suggest the following strategies that may reduce educational inequity for Indigenous students: (a) developing clearly articulated inclusive educational policies along with indicators of inclusivity; (b) reporting the number of Indigenous students who are identified as emotionally and behaviourally disordered, and segregated in self-contained settings; (c) establishing needs-based models of support at all levels (e.g., province, division, and school); (d) creating new narratives of assessment and pedagogy; and (e) reconceptualizing teachers’ training. We hope that by critically examining the structures and processes of special education that, in fact, disable Indigenous students from educational success, inclusion might encompass more than a provincial philosophy and include transformative educational change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估,分类,分类:马尼托巴省学校土著学生的“其他”
在加拿大马尼托巴省,包容性教育的言论与其实际实施之间存在差距。在缺乏包容性教育政策和指导方针的情况下,基于赤字的方法很普遍,比如对被认为患有严重情绪和行为障碍的学生进行分类标签、隔离教室和独立项目,需要改变。本文对特殊教育范式如何有助于残疾的社会建构提供了一个批判性的视角;对于土著学生来说,它往往将行为差异定位为残疾;此外,为什么这种做法具有系统歧视性。在我们的研究中,我们试图揭露名义上包容性学校中存在的排斥现象(Slee&Allen,2001),以此促进社会变革,并将教育转向真正的包容性实践。为此,我们建议采取以下战略,以减少土著学生的教育不平等:(a)制定明确的包容性教育政策以及包容性指标;(b) 报告被认定为情绪和行为紊乱、在独立环境中被隔离的土著学生人数;(c) 在各级(如省、区和学校)建立基于需求的支持模式;(d) 创造新的评估和教育叙事;以及(e)重新界定教师培训的概念。我们希望,通过批判性地研究特殊教育的结构和过程,事实上,这些结构和过程使土著学生无法获得教育成功,包容可能不仅仅包括一种省级哲学,还包括变革性的教育变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality Education International
Exceptionality Education International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“We Need Structures in Place”: Educators’ Experiences With Special Education at International Schools Whereto From Here? A Discussion Among International Scholars of Inclusive Education Inclusive Change in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: A Collaborative Autoethnography Predictors of Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Education: A Comparison of Canada and Germany How Do Attitudes and Self-Efficacy Predict Teachers’ Intentions to Use Inclusive Practices? A Cross-National Comparison Between Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1