Delphi Method Consensus-Based Identification of Primary Trauma Care Skills Required for General Surgeons in Japan

K. Hirose, S. Murakami, Y. Kurashima, N. Sato, Saseem Poudel, Kimitaka Tanaka, A. Matsui, Y. Nakanishi, Toshimichi Asano, T. Noji, Y. Ebihara, Toru Nakamura, T. Tsuchikawa, T. Shichinohe, Kazufumi Okada, I. Yokota, Naoto Hasegawa, Satoshi Hirano
{"title":"Delphi Method Consensus-Based Identification of Primary Trauma Care Skills Required for General Surgeons in Japan","authors":"K. Hirose, S. Murakami, Y. Kurashima, N. Sato, Saseem Poudel, Kimitaka Tanaka, A. Matsui, Y. Nakanishi, Toshimichi Asano, T. Noji, Y. Ebihara, Toru Nakamura, T. Tsuchikawa, T. Shichinohe, Kazufumi Okada, I. Yokota, Naoto Hasegawa, Satoshi Hirano","doi":"10.17479/jacs.2023.13.2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: General surgeons at regional hospitals should have the primary trauma care skills necessary to treat critically ill trauma patients to withstand transfer. This study was conducted to identify a consensus on primary trauma care skills for general surgeons.Methods: An initial list of acute care surgical skills was compiled, and revised by six trauma experts (acute care surgeons); 33 skills were nominated for inclusion in the Delphi consensus survey. Participants (councilors of the Japanese Society for Acute Care Surgery) were presented with the list of 33 trauma care skills and were asked (using web-based software) to rate how strongly they agreed or disagreed (using a 5-point Likert scale) with the necessity of each skill for a general surgeon. The reliability of consensus was predefined as Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.8, and trauma care skills were considered as primarily required when rated 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) by ≥ 80% participants.Results: There were 117 trauma care specialists contacted to participate in the Delphi consensus survey panel. In the 1st round, 85 specialists participated (response rate: 72.6%). In the 2nd round, 66 specialists participated (response rate: 77.6%). Consensus was achieved after two rounds, reliability using Cronbach’s α was 0.94, and 34 items were identified as primary trauma care skills needed by general surgeons.Conclusion: A consensus-based list of trauma care skills required by general surgeons was developed. This list can facilitate the development of a new trauma training course which has been optimized for general surgeons.","PeriodicalId":34662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2023.13.2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: General surgeons at regional hospitals should have the primary trauma care skills necessary to treat critically ill trauma patients to withstand transfer. This study was conducted to identify a consensus on primary trauma care skills for general surgeons.Methods: An initial list of acute care surgical skills was compiled, and revised by six trauma experts (acute care surgeons); 33 skills were nominated for inclusion in the Delphi consensus survey. Participants (councilors of the Japanese Society for Acute Care Surgery) were presented with the list of 33 trauma care skills and were asked (using web-based software) to rate how strongly they agreed or disagreed (using a 5-point Likert scale) with the necessity of each skill for a general surgeon. The reliability of consensus was predefined as Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.8, and trauma care skills were considered as primarily required when rated 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) by ≥ 80% participants.Results: There were 117 trauma care specialists contacted to participate in the Delphi consensus survey panel. In the 1st round, 85 specialists participated (response rate: 72.6%). In the 2nd round, 66 specialists participated (response rate: 77.6%). Consensus was achieved after two rounds, reliability using Cronbach’s α was 0.94, and 34 items were identified as primary trauma care skills needed by general surgeons.Conclusion: A consensus-based list of trauma care skills required by general surgeons was developed. This list can facilitate the development of a new trauma training course which has been optimized for general surgeons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于德尔菲法共识的日本普通外科医生初级创伤护理技能鉴定
目的:地区医院的普通外科医生应该具备治疗危重创伤患者所需的初级创伤护理技能,以承受转移。本研究旨在确定普通外科医生在初级创伤护理技能方面的共识。方法:编制一份初步的急性护理外科技能清单,并由六名创伤专家(急性护理外科医生)进行修订;33项技能被提名纳入德尔福共识调查。参与者(日本急性护理外科学会理事)收到了33项创伤护理技能的清单,并被要求(使用基于网络的软件)对他们对普通外科医生每项技能的必要性的同意或不同意程度(使用5分Likert量表)进行评分。共识的可靠性被预先定义为Cronbachα≥0.8,当≥80%的参与者评分为4(同意)或5(强烈同意)时,创伤护理技能被认为是主要要求。结果:共有117名创伤护理专家参与德尔福共识调查小组。在第一轮中,有85名专家参与(应答率:72.6%)。在第二轮中,66名专家参与,应答率:77.6%。两轮后达成共识,使用Cronbachα的可靠性为0.94,34项被确定为普通外科医生所需的初级创伤护理技能。结论:制定了一份基于共识的普通外科医生所需创伤护理技能清单。这份清单可以帮助开发一个新的创伤培训课程,该课程已针对普通外科医生进行了优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Case of Acute Appendicitis Complicated by Necrotizing Fasciitis Requiring Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Management of Respiratory Failure in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Case Report Difficult Small Bowel Bleeding in Surgical View The Association of Isolated Cecal Necrosis Symptoms with Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report The Effect of Polymyxin B-Immobilized Fiber Column Hemoperfusion for Sepsis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1