Impeaching the President: Mapping the Political Landscape in the House of Representatives

Christopher A. Martínez, Mariana Llanos, R. Tatalovich
{"title":"Impeaching the President: Mapping the Political Landscape in the House of Representatives","authors":"Christopher A. Martínez, Mariana Llanos, R. Tatalovich","doi":"10.1080/07343469.2021.1934186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Our main objective is to explain why and under what conditions legislators (co)sponsor impeachment resolutions against the president of the United States. We examine the impact of political, institutional, and economic variables, suggested by presidency and impeachment scholarship, on the behavior of 2,044 legislators who were members of the House of Representatives between 1973 and 2019. To test these hypotheses, we use two-level logistic regressions and an original dataset of all presidential impeachment resolutions filed in the House during that period. Our primary findings are that impeachment resolutions against the president are driven by individual-level variables such as representatives’ ideological extremity and partisanship. Our analysis also shows that the occurrence of major presidential scandals incentivizes representatives to target the chief executive. Surprisingly, we find no statistical evidence for the effects of divided government, presidential approval, and macro-economic factors. Our results suggest that representatives use impeachment resolutions both for position taking and for rendering the president accountable.","PeriodicalId":41473,"journal":{"name":"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07343469.2021.1934186","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2021.1934186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Our main objective is to explain why and under what conditions legislators (co)sponsor impeachment resolutions against the president of the United States. We examine the impact of political, institutional, and economic variables, suggested by presidency and impeachment scholarship, on the behavior of 2,044 legislators who were members of the House of Representatives between 1973 and 2019. To test these hypotheses, we use two-level logistic regressions and an original dataset of all presidential impeachment resolutions filed in the House during that period. Our primary findings are that impeachment resolutions against the president are driven by individual-level variables such as representatives’ ideological extremity and partisanship. Our analysis also shows that the occurrence of major presidential scandals incentivizes representatives to target the chief executive. Surprisingly, we find no statistical evidence for the effects of divided government, presidential approval, and macro-economic factors. Our results suggest that representatives use impeachment resolutions both for position taking and for rendering the president accountable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹劾总统:绘制众议院的政治版图
我们的主要目的是解释立法者为什么以及在什么条件下共同发起针对美国总统的弹劾决议。我们研究了总统和弹劾研究提出的政治、制度和经济变量对1973年至2019年期间担任众议院议员的2044名立法者行为的影响。为了检验这些假设,我们使用了两级逻辑回归和一个原始数据集,该数据集包含了在此期间众议院提交的所有总统弹劾决议。我们的主要发现是,针对总统的弹劾决议受到个人层面变量的驱动,如代表的意识形态极端和党派关系。我们的分析也显示,总统重大丑闻的发生,会激励代表们把矛头指向行政长官。令人惊讶的是,我们没有发现分裂政府、总统支持率和宏观经济因素影响的统计证据。我们的研究结果表明,代表们使用弹劾决议既是为了表明立场,也是为了让总统承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Broadening Perspectives in Studies of American Governance Morgan, Iwan. FDR: Transforming the Presidency and Renewing America McKay, Amy Melissa. Stealth Lobbying: Interest Group Influence and Health Care Reform Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy Opportunities for Legislative Influence? Latinos and Committee Participation in the U.S. Congress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1