Unpleasant surprises? Debt relief and risk of sovereign default

IF 1.3 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Financial Economic Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.1108/jfep-12-2022-0294
J. W. Ahiadorme
{"title":"Unpleasant surprises? Debt relief and risk of sovereign default","authors":"J. W. Ahiadorme","doi":"10.1108/jfep-12-2022-0294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe Covid-19 pandemic has rekindled interest in sovereign debt crises amidst calls for debt relief for developing and emerging countries. But has debt relief lessened the debt burdens of emerging and developing economies? The purpose of this paper is to empirically address this question. In particular, the focus is on the implications of debt relief and institutional qualities for sovereign debt in emerging and developing economies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe model extends the framework on the probability of default by incorporating the receipt of debt relief by a debtor country. Doing so allows to better explain movements of sovereign defaults relating to debt relief. The model is estimated via the regular probit regression.\n\n\nFindings\nThe analysis shows that the debt relief provided, thus, far, failed to ease the debt overhang problems of developing and emerging countries and reduced investment. The current debt relief schemes may underscore the prospects of self-enforcing and self-fulfilling sovereign debt crises rather than eliminating the dilemma completely. Regarding the forms of debt relief, the analysis shows that debt forgiveness offers favourable prospects in terms of debt sustainability and economic outcomes than debt rescheduling. Perhaps, the sovereign debt crises, particularly in low-income countries, hinge on insolvency problems rather than transitory illiquidity issues.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAny debt relief mechanism should consider seriously the potential incentive effect that reinforces expectations of future debt-relief initiatives. Importantly, solving the sovereign debt problem requires a programme for sustained investment and economic growth, while not discounting the critical role of prudent debt management policies and institutions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes a different angle to the debate on sovereign debt distress. Aside from the structural and economic factors, this study investigates the role of debt management policy in the debtor nation and the implications of debt relief benefits for sovereign risk. The framework also focuses on whether the different forms of debt relief exert distinctive impacts.\n","PeriodicalId":45556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-12-2022-0294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The Covid-19 pandemic has rekindled interest in sovereign debt crises amidst calls for debt relief for developing and emerging countries. But has debt relief lessened the debt burdens of emerging and developing economies? The purpose of this paper is to empirically address this question. In particular, the focus is on the implications of debt relief and institutional qualities for sovereign debt in emerging and developing economies. Design/methodology/approach The model extends the framework on the probability of default by incorporating the receipt of debt relief by a debtor country. Doing so allows to better explain movements of sovereign defaults relating to debt relief. The model is estimated via the regular probit regression. Findings The analysis shows that the debt relief provided, thus, far, failed to ease the debt overhang problems of developing and emerging countries and reduced investment. The current debt relief schemes may underscore the prospects of self-enforcing and self-fulfilling sovereign debt crises rather than eliminating the dilemma completely. Regarding the forms of debt relief, the analysis shows that debt forgiveness offers favourable prospects in terms of debt sustainability and economic outcomes than debt rescheduling. Perhaps, the sovereign debt crises, particularly in low-income countries, hinge on insolvency problems rather than transitory illiquidity issues. Practical implications Any debt relief mechanism should consider seriously the potential incentive effect that reinforces expectations of future debt-relief initiatives. Importantly, solving the sovereign debt problem requires a programme for sustained investment and economic growth, while not discounting the critical role of prudent debt management policies and institutions. Originality/value This study contributes a different angle to the debate on sovereign debt distress. Aside from the structural and economic factors, this study investigates the role of debt management policy in the debtor nation and the implications of debt relief benefits for sovereign risk. The framework also focuses on whether the different forms of debt relief exert distinctive impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不愉快的惊喜?债务减免和主权违约风险
在要求减免发展中国家和新兴国家债务的呼声中,2019冠状病毒病大流行重新引发了人们对主权债务危机的关注。但减免债务是否减轻了新兴和发展中经济体的债务负担?本文的目的是实证地解决这个问题。重点特别放在债务减免和机构性质对新兴和发展中经济体主权债务的影响上。设计/方法/方法该模型通过纳入债务国接受债务减免的情况,扩展了关于违约概率的框架。这样做可以更好地解释与债务减免有关的主权违约的走势。通过正则probit回归对模型进行估计。结果分析表明,迄今为止提供的债务减免未能缓解发展中国家和新兴国家的债务积压问题,并减少了投资。目前的债务减免计划可能突显出主权债务危机自我实施和自我实现的前景,而不是完全消除这种困境。关于债务减免的形式,分析表明,在债务可持续性和经济结果方面,债务减免比重新安排债务期限具有有利的前景。或许,主权债务危机,尤其是低收入国家的主权债务危机,取决于资不抵债问题,而不是暂时的流动性不足问题。任何债务减免机制都应认真考虑潜在的激励效应,这种效应会加强人们对未来债务减免举措的期望。重要的是,解决主权债务问题需要一个可持续投资和经济增长的计划,同时不低估审慎债务管理政策和机构的关键作用。本研究为主权债务危机的争论提供了一个不同的角度。除了结构和经济因素外,本研究还探讨了债务管理政策在债务国的作用以及债务减免利益对主权风险的影响。该框架还侧重于不同形式的债务减免是否会产生不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Economic Policy publishes high quality peer reviewed research on financial economic policy issues. The journal is devoted to the advancement of the understanding of the entire spectrum of financial policy and control issues and their interactions to economic phenomena. Economic and financial phenomena involve complex trade-offs and linkages between various types of risk factors and variables of interest to policy makers and market participants alike. Market participants such as economic policy makers, regulators, banking and competition supervisors, corporations and financial institutions, require timely and robust answers to the contemporary and emerging policy questions. In turn, such answers require thorough input by the academics, policy makers and practitioners alike. The Journal of Financial Economic Policy provides the forum to satisfy this need. The journal publishes and invites concise papers to enable a prompt response to current and emerging policy affairs.
期刊最新文献
The impact of formal and informal credit institutions on entrepreneurship Financial inclusion and household consumption behaviour in Ghana The absorptive capacity of the institution in the link between remittances and financial development in Africa: an advance panel regression Why do Indian exporting firms borrow in foreign currency? Volatility dynamics in energy and agriculture markets: An analysis of domestic and global uncertainty factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1