Meritocracy’s Disguise

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ECNU Review of Education Pub Date : 2022-11-20 DOI:10.1177/20965311221141106
Yisu Zhou (周忆粟)
{"title":"Meritocracy’s Disguise","authors":"Yisu Zhou (周忆粟)","doi":"10.1177/20965311221141106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zachary Howlett’s book provides a new account of meritocracy in China. Unlike economists with their single-minded ideas of merits vis-à-vis individualized skills, Howlett deconstructs the concept to its social foundations. The book’s central subject is Gaokao, the national college entrance examination, where merits are constructed, tested, and publicly displayed. Howlett conceptualizes Gaokao as “fateful rites of passage” (pp. 10–18) that people feel as not only serving “to represent the universalistic judgment of the national community but also that of the ultimate transcendental power—fate” (p. 203). Fateful events are rituals; therefore, they are suited for ethnographic examination. Using such data from three sites in Fujian during 2011–2013, Howlett’s work is the latest attempt to understand the enormous Chinese system. This book comprises six chapters, analyzing various aspects of the fatefulness of Gaokao. Chapter One provides the contextualization. Chapter Two examines the high stakes involved and the consequences of the exam. Chapter Three focuses on the uncertainty of Gaokao. Chapter Four discusses the individual character of the test takers, while Chapter Five zooms in to the moment of the examination. Chapter Six provides a unique perspective on the religious and magical dimension of the fateful event.","PeriodicalId":33103,"journal":{"name":"ECNU Review of Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"183 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECNU Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221141106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zachary Howlett’s book provides a new account of meritocracy in China. Unlike economists with their single-minded ideas of merits vis-à-vis individualized skills, Howlett deconstructs the concept to its social foundations. The book’s central subject is Gaokao, the national college entrance examination, where merits are constructed, tested, and publicly displayed. Howlett conceptualizes Gaokao as “fateful rites of passage” (pp. 10–18) that people feel as not only serving “to represent the universalistic judgment of the national community but also that of the ultimate transcendental power—fate” (p. 203). Fateful events are rituals; therefore, they are suited for ethnographic examination. Using such data from three sites in Fujian during 2011–2013, Howlett’s work is the latest attempt to understand the enormous Chinese system. This book comprises six chapters, analyzing various aspects of the fatefulness of Gaokao. Chapter One provides the contextualization. Chapter Two examines the high stakes involved and the consequences of the exam. Chapter Three focuses on the uncertainty of Gaokao. Chapter Four discusses the individual character of the test takers, while Chapter Five zooms in to the moment of the examination. Chapter Six provides a unique perspective on the religious and magical dimension of the fateful event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英政治的伪装
Zachary Howlett的书对中国的精英政治进行了新的描述。与经济学家们对个人技能的优点有着专一的看法不同,豪利特将这一概念解构为其社会基础。这本书的中心科目是高考,这是一种全国性的高考,在这里可以构建、测试和公开展示成绩。豪利特将高考概念化为“命运的成人仪式”(第10-18页),人们认为高考不仅是为了“代表民族共同体的普遍性判断,也是终极超越力量——命运的判断”(第203页)。命运事件是仪式;因此,它们适合民族志研究。Howlett的研究利用2011-2013年间福建三个地点的数据,是了解中国庞大系统的最新尝试。本书共分六章,从多个方面分析了高考的命运。第一章提供了语境化。第二章考察了高考的高风险和后果。第三章重点讨论了高考的不确定性。第四章讨论了考生的个性,而第五章则着眼于考试的时刻。第六章对这一重大事件的宗教和魔法层面提供了一个独特的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ECNU Review of Education
ECNU Review of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Educational Improvement Science: The Art of the Improving Organization Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Young Children: Redeveloping the Five Big Ideas Framework Extending the Comparisons of Shadow Education and Its Nexus With Schooling Toward a High-Quality System: A Critique of Chinese Special Education Policy Development and the Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Quality of Special Education Schools China's Policy Actions to Lead Teacher Development With Evaluation Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1