Like Shooting Fish in a Barrel

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1086/726438
Grant Farred
{"title":"Like Shooting Fish in a Barrel","authors":"Grant Farred","doi":"10.1086/726438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the May 14, 2022, violent shooting attack by an eighteen-yearold white gunman, Payton Gendron, which killed ten black residents of Masten Park, BuffaloNY, a predominantly black neighborhood located on Buffalo’s East side, a range of responses were offered by this community. As expected, there was pain and anguish at Gendron’s brutal, ideologically driven plan to inflict as much black death as he possibly could. Driving more than two hours north to the Tops supermarket on Buffalo’s East side from his home on the outskirts of Binghamton, NY, Gendron’s motivation for the shooting was clearly laid out, specific in its intent and execution. The arithmetical logic of Gendron’s manifesto is the product of a deliberate set of racial (racist) calculations. Gendron’s logic is, as we shall see, imbricated in a notion of the biopolitical focused upon the right to choose, a right fundamental to the logic of neo-liberalism. As such, the biopolitical so delineated works to unveil a series of rights in which the ability to choose follows sequentially from the possession of capital, both racial and economic. A series of biopolitical rights that, moreover, itself derives from the protection afforded to some by the state’s sovereign violence; or, as Slavoj Žižek reminds us, by the state’s founding upon the principles of retaining unto itself an “excess” of “power.” Within the context of this symposium on abolition (of the police, principally), this essay offers an argument for expanding the targets for abolition—widening the contours of the abolition paradigm—by situating us within a discourse we might name, evocatively, a self-sublimating black fear.","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the aftermath of the May 14, 2022, violent shooting attack by an eighteen-yearold white gunman, Payton Gendron, which killed ten black residents of Masten Park, BuffaloNY, a predominantly black neighborhood located on Buffalo’s East side, a range of responses were offered by this community. As expected, there was pain and anguish at Gendron’s brutal, ideologically driven plan to inflict as much black death as he possibly could. Driving more than two hours north to the Tops supermarket on Buffalo’s East side from his home on the outskirts of Binghamton, NY, Gendron’s motivation for the shooting was clearly laid out, specific in its intent and execution. The arithmetical logic of Gendron’s manifesto is the product of a deliberate set of racial (racist) calculations. Gendron’s logic is, as we shall see, imbricated in a notion of the biopolitical focused upon the right to choose, a right fundamental to the logic of neo-liberalism. As such, the biopolitical so delineated works to unveil a series of rights in which the ability to choose follows sequentially from the possession of capital, both racial and economic. A series of biopolitical rights that, moreover, itself derives from the protection afforded to some by the state’s sovereign violence; or, as Slavoj Žižek reminds us, by the state’s founding upon the principles of retaining unto itself an “excess” of “power.” Within the context of this symposium on abolition (of the police, principally), this essay offers an argument for expanding the targets for abolition—widening the contours of the abolition paradigm—by situating us within a discourse we might name, evocatively, a self-sublimating black fear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就像在桶里打鱼一样
2022年5月14日,18岁的白人枪手Payton Gendron发动暴力枪击袭击,导致水牛城Masten公园的10名黑人居民死亡。水牛城是一个位于水牛城东侧的以黑人为主的社区。在这之后,该社区做出了一系列回应。不出所料,Gendron的残酷、意识形态驱动的计划让他尽可能多地造成黑人死亡,这让他感到痛苦和痛苦。从纽约州宾汉姆顿郊区的家向北驱车两个多小时到达布法罗东区的Tops超市,Gendron的枪击动机很明确,具体表现在意图和执行上。Gendron宣言的算术逻辑是一系列蓄意的种族主义计算的产物。正如我们将看到的那样,Gendron的逻辑在一个关注选择权的生物政治概念中是重叠的,这是新自由主义逻辑的基本权利。因此,如此描绘的生物政治揭示了一系列权利,在这些权利中,选择的能力从拥有资本开始,依次是种族和经济。此外,一系列生物政治权利本身来源于国家主权暴力对一些人的保护;或者,正如斯拉沃日泽克提醒我们的那样,国家建立在保留“过度”“权力”的原则之上,令人回味的是,一种自我升华的黑人恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Does Size Matter in the Context of the Global South? Theorizing the Smallest States The Unique and the Universal in International Studies Theories from the Global South Ideas from the Global South: Dependency and Decoloniality Incorporating Global South Perspectives in the Study of International Relations: Reflections on the Field Long Day’s Journey Into Night
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1