School Social Work and the Educational Justice Movement: A Snapshot of Practice

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Children & Schools Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1093/cs/cdaa014
Anna L. Ball, Candra Skrzypek
{"title":"School Social Work and the Educational Justice Movement: A Snapshot of Practice","authors":"Anna L. Ball, Candra Skrzypek","doi":"10.1093/cs/cdaa014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Educational disparities and disproportionalities for oppressed children signal the need for an educational justice movement that focuses on macro-level changes within and outside of the educational system. School social workers are uniquely trained to engage in activities that promote educational justice, yet most school social workers focus on micro-level practice with individuals. Drawing on Teasley’s practice recommendations to improve educational outcomes for African American urban youths, this study examined the extent to which school social workers engage in macro-level practice strategies that promote educational justice. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 112 school social workers. Results indicated that most participants reported little engagement in macro-level practice in support of educational justice, most notably in relation to leadership and public policy advocacy and school choice. Social workers reported the most engagement in areas associated with typical practice, such as family engagement and schoolwide needs assessment. Implications for school social work training, practice, and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":35453,"journal":{"name":"Children & Schools","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cs/cdaa014","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdaa014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Educational disparities and disproportionalities for oppressed children signal the need for an educational justice movement that focuses on macro-level changes within and outside of the educational system. School social workers are uniquely trained to engage in activities that promote educational justice, yet most school social workers focus on micro-level practice with individuals. Drawing on Teasley’s practice recommendations to improve educational outcomes for African American urban youths, this study examined the extent to which school social workers engage in macro-level practice strategies that promote educational justice. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 112 school social workers. Results indicated that most participants reported little engagement in macro-level practice in support of educational justice, most notably in relation to leadership and public policy advocacy and school choice. Social workers reported the most engagement in areas associated with typical practice, such as family engagement and schoolwide needs assessment. Implications for school social work training, practice, and future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校社会工作与教育正义运动:实践快照
受压迫儿童的教育差距和不成比例表明,需要开展一场教育正义运动,重点关注教育系统内外宏观层面的变化。学校社会工作者在从事促进教育公正的活动方面受过独特的培训,但大多数学校社会工作者关注的是个体的微观实践。借鉴Teasley关于改善非裔美国城市青年教育成果的实践建议,本研究考察了学校社会工作者参与促进教育公正的宏观实践策略的程度。横断面调查数据来自112名学校社工。结果表明,大多数参与者报告很少参与支持教育公正的宏观层面实践,特别是在领导和公共政策倡导以及学校选择方面。据报告,社会工作者在与典型实践相关的领域中参与度最高,例如家庭参与和全校需求评估。对学校社会工作培训、实践和未来研究的启示进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Children & Schools
Children & Schools SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Children & Schools publishes professional materials relevant to social work services for children. The journal publishes articles on innovations in practice, interdisciplinary efforts, research, program evaluation, policy, and planning. Topics include student-authority relationships, multiculturalism, early intervention, needs assessment, violence, and ADHD. Children & Schools is a practitioner-to-practitioner resource.
期刊最新文献
Children & Schools From Intent to Impact: Building University-Assisted Community Schools in New Mexico School-Based Postvention Services: Exploring the Perspectives of Students Role of School Quality and Neighborhood Disadvantage in Educational Attainment: Do They Vary by Race? Schools and Juvenile Treatment Drug Courts: A Case Study on Treatment Access through Collaboration and Advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1