Does the Immediacy of Feedback Matter in Game-Based Classroom Management? Analysis of the Caught Being Good Game With Adolescent Students

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.1177/10983007211068534
Clare Bohan, C. McDowell, Sinéad Smyth
{"title":"Does the Immediacy of Feedback Matter in Game-Based Classroom Management? Analysis of the Caught Being Good Game With Adolescent Students","authors":"Clare Bohan, C. McDowell, Sinéad Smyth","doi":"10.1177/10983007211068534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated use of the Caught Being Good Game (CBGG) across two adolescent student populations, maintaining a focus on the provision of feedback during the game. The CBGG, a variation of the group contingency intervention the Good Behavior Game (GBG), is a classroom management intervention that involves the provision of points to teams of students who follow class rules. Feedback was manipulated during the game to ascertain whether immediate visual feedback was always necessary. The CBGG was presented with and without immediate visual feedback across phases, using a multiple treatment reversal design. Intervention conditions were counterbalanced across two classrooms of mainstream adolescent students. Data were collected on academically engaged and disruptive behaviors. The CBGG was generally effective in targeting these behaviors in both classrooms, with some differential effects apparent for CBGG versions across classrooms. This provides further support for the use of the CBGG as a positive classroom management technique and as an alternative to the classic GBG. The findings also suggest that teachers may choose whether to use feedback or not during the CBGG, which may save them time and increase buy-in by incorporating an opportunity for some autonomy in game implementation.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"24 1","pages":"208 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007211068534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study evaluated use of the Caught Being Good Game (CBGG) across two adolescent student populations, maintaining a focus on the provision of feedback during the game. The CBGG, a variation of the group contingency intervention the Good Behavior Game (GBG), is a classroom management intervention that involves the provision of points to teams of students who follow class rules. Feedback was manipulated during the game to ascertain whether immediate visual feedback was always necessary. The CBGG was presented with and without immediate visual feedback across phases, using a multiple treatment reversal design. Intervention conditions were counterbalanced across two classrooms of mainstream adolescent students. Data were collected on academically engaged and disruptive behaviors. The CBGG was generally effective in targeting these behaviors in both classrooms, with some differential effects apparent for CBGG versions across classrooms. This provides further support for the use of the CBGG as a positive classroom management technique and as an alternative to the classic GBG. The findings also suggest that teachers may choose whether to use feedback or not during the CBGG, which may save them time and increase buy-in by incorporating an opportunity for some autonomy in game implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在基于游戏的课堂管理中,反馈的即时性是否重要?青少年学生“被抓”游戏分析
本研究评估了两个青少年学生群体对“被抓到是好游戏”(CBGG)的使用情况,并在游戏过程中保持对反馈的关注。CBGG是群体应急干预良好行为游戏(GBG)的一种变体,是一种课堂管理干预,包括向遵守课堂规则的学生团队提供分数。我们在游戏过程中操纵反馈,以确定即时视觉反馈是否总是必要的。采用多重治疗逆转设计,CBGG在不同阶段有或没有即时视觉反馈。干预条件在两个班级的主流青少年学生之间是平衡的。收集了有关学业投入和破坏性行为的数据。CBGG在两个教室中都能有效地针对这些行为,但不同教室的CBGG版本的效果存在明显差异。这为CBGG作为一种积极的课堂管理技术以及作为经典GBG的替代方案提供了进一步的支持。研究结果还表明,教师可以在CBGG期间选择是否使用反馈,这可以节省他们的时间,并通过在游戏执行中加入一些自主权来增加购买量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.
期刊最新文献
Intensifying Tier 1 Classroom Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Practices to Support Students With Disabilities: A Pilot Study An Adaptation of Stay Play Talk for Young Children Who Exhibit Social Withdrawal Examining Immediate and Sustained Effects of Check-In/Check-Out in Finnish Elementary Schools Examining the Impact of PBIS Experience on MTSS Implementation in Secondary Schools: A Mixed Methods Study Examining Use of the Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings to Build Expectation Matrices: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1