On capital allocation under information constraints

IF 0.3 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Risk Pub Date : 2019-06-14 DOI:10.21314/jor.2022.057
Christoph J. Borner, Ingo Hoffmann, Fabian Poetter, Tim Schmitz
{"title":"On capital allocation under information constraints","authors":"Christoph J. Borner, Ingo Hoffmann, Fabian Poetter, Tim Schmitz","doi":"10.21314/jor.2022.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attempts to allocate capital across a selection of different investments are often hampered by the fact that investors' decisions are made under limited information (no historical return data) and during an extremely limited timeframe. Nevertheless, in some cases, rational investors with a certain level of experience are able to ordinally rank investment alternatives through relative assessments of the probabilities that investments will be successful. However, to apply traditional portfolio optimization models, analysts must use historical (or simulated/expected) return data as the basis for their calculations. This paper develops an alternative portfolio optimization framework that is able to handle this kind of information (given by an ordinal ranking of investment alternatives) and to calculate an optimal capital allocation based on a Cobb-Douglas function, which we call the Sorted Weighted Portfolio (SWP). Considering risk-neutral investors, we show that the results of this portfolio optimization model usually outperform the output generated by the (intuitive) Equally Weighted Portfolio (EWP) of different investment alternatives, which is the result of optimization when one is unable to incorporate additional data (the ordinal ranking of the alternatives). To further extend this work, we show that our model can also address risk-averse investors to capture correlation effects.","PeriodicalId":46697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2022.057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Attempts to allocate capital across a selection of different investments are often hampered by the fact that investors' decisions are made under limited information (no historical return data) and during an extremely limited timeframe. Nevertheless, in some cases, rational investors with a certain level of experience are able to ordinally rank investment alternatives through relative assessments of the probabilities that investments will be successful. However, to apply traditional portfolio optimization models, analysts must use historical (or simulated/expected) return data as the basis for their calculations. This paper develops an alternative portfolio optimization framework that is able to handle this kind of information (given by an ordinal ranking of investment alternatives) and to calculate an optimal capital allocation based on a Cobb-Douglas function, which we call the Sorted Weighted Portfolio (SWP). Considering risk-neutral investors, we show that the results of this portfolio optimization model usually outperform the output generated by the (intuitive) Equally Weighted Portfolio (EWP) of different investment alternatives, which is the result of optimization when one is unable to incorporate additional data (the ordinal ranking of the alternatives). To further extend this work, we show that our model can also address risk-averse investors to capture correlation effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论信息约束下的资本配置
投资者的决策是在有限的信息下(没有历史回报数据)和极其有限的时间内做出的,因此,在选择不同的投资中分配资本的尝试往往会受到阻碍。然而,在某些情况下,具有一定经验的理性投资者能够通过对投资成功概率的相对评估,对投资方案进行一般排序。然而,要应用传统的投资组合优化模型,分析师必须使用历史(或模拟/预期)回报数据作为计算的基础。本文开发了一个备选投资组合优化框架,该框架能够处理这类信息(由投资备选方案的顺序排序给出),并基于Cobb Douglas函数计算最优资本分配,我们称之为排序加权投资组合(SWP)。考虑到风险中性投资者,我们表明,该投资组合优化模型的结果通常优于不同投资备选方案的(直观的)等权重投资组合(EWP)产生的产出,这是当无法纳入额外数据(备选方案的顺序排序)时优化的结果。为了进一步扩展这项工作,我们表明,我们的模型也可以解决规避风险的投资者,以捕捉相关性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Risk
Journal of Risk BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: This international peer-reviewed journal publishes a broad range of original research papers which aim to further develop understanding of financial risk management. As the only publication devoted exclusively to theoretical and empirical studies in financial risk management, The Journal of Risk promotes far-reaching research on the latest innovations in this field, with particular focus on the measurement, management and analysis of financial risk. The Journal of Risk is particularly interested in papers on the following topics: Risk management regulations and their implications, Risk capital allocation and risk budgeting, Efficient evaluation of risk measures under increasingly complex and realistic model assumptions, Impact of risk measurement on portfolio allocation, Theoretical development of alternative risk measures, Hedging (linear and non-linear) under alternative risk measures, Financial market model risk, Estimation of volatility and unanticipated jumps, Capital allocation.
期刊最新文献
A Case of Isolated Central Nervous System Rosai-Dorfman Disease. Asymmetric risk spillovers between oil and the Chinese stock market: a Beta-skew-t-EGARCH-EVT-copula approach Allocating and forecasting changes in risk Target-date funds: lessons learned The impact of treasury operations and off-balance-sheet credit business on commercial bank credit risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1