A ‘planning revolution’ or an ‘attack on planning’ in England: digitization, digitalization, and democratization

IF 1.7 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING International Planning Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1080/13563475.2021.1979942
P. Boland, Abigail C. Durrant, Justin McHenry, S. McKay, Alexander Wilson
{"title":"A ‘planning revolution’ or an ‘attack on planning’ in England: digitization, digitalization, and democratization","authors":"P. Boland, Abigail C. Durrant, Justin McHenry, S. McKay, Alexander Wilson","doi":"10.1080/13563475.2021.1979942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article focuses on the planning–technology nexus. Recent work explores the potential of digital technology in overcoming the longstanding limitations of a lack of public engagement and citizen empowerment in the planning process. In August 2020, the Government published a White Paper to democratize, digitize, and digitalize the planning system. We interrogate whether these radical reforms constitute a ‘planning revolution’ or an ‘attack on planning’; we focus on two important issues: democratic deficit and digital divide. The article examines how statements about digitization and digitalization may meet the Government’s desire to make the planning process more inclusive (i.e. equitable, fair, just) by empowering greater numbers of people to influence planning decisions for their local communities. In this agenda-setting article, we reflect on the English planning landscape; more broadly, we critically reflect on the values and political rhetoric involved in embracing technological innovations, and how these intersect with societal concerns.","PeriodicalId":46688,"journal":{"name":"International Planning Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1979942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article focuses on the planning–technology nexus. Recent work explores the potential of digital technology in overcoming the longstanding limitations of a lack of public engagement and citizen empowerment in the planning process. In August 2020, the Government published a White Paper to democratize, digitize, and digitalize the planning system. We interrogate whether these radical reforms constitute a ‘planning revolution’ or an ‘attack on planning’; we focus on two important issues: democratic deficit and digital divide. The article examines how statements about digitization and digitalization may meet the Government’s desire to make the planning process more inclusive (i.e. equitable, fair, just) by empowering greater numbers of people to influence planning decisions for their local communities. In this agenda-setting article, we reflect on the English planning landscape; more broadly, we critically reflect on the values and political rhetoric involved in embracing technological innovations, and how these intersect with societal concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国的“计划革命”或“对计划的攻击”:数字化、数字化和民主化
摘要本文关注规划与技术的关系。最近的工作探索了数字技术在克服规划过程中缺乏公众参与和公民赋权的长期局限性方面的潜力。2020年8月,政府发布了一份白皮书,对规划系统进行民主化、数字化和数字化。我们质疑这些激进的改革是构成“计划革命”还是“对计划的攻击”;我们关注两个重要问题:民主赤字和数字鸿沟。这篇文章探讨了关于数字化和数字化的声明如何满足政府的愿望,即通过授权更多的人影响当地社区的规划决策,使规划过程更具包容性(即公平、公平、公正)。在这篇设置议程的文章中,我们反思了英国的规划景观;更广泛地说,我们批判性地反思了拥抱技术创新所涉及的价值观和政治言论,以及这些与社会关切的交叉点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Planning Studies
International Planning Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Planning, at urban, regional, national and international levels, faces new challenges, notably those related to the growth of globalisation as both an objective socio-economic process and a shift in policy-maker perceptions and modes of analysis. International Planning Studies (IPS) addresses these issues by publishing quality research in a variety of specific fields and from a range of theoretical and normative perspectives, which helps improve understanding of the actual and potential role of planning and planners in this context.
期刊最新文献
New cities for a ‘new Kuwait’: planning for national continuity and stability Opportunity for informal business networking to reshape the institutional capacity of community in housing revitalization projects: learning from Bandung and Surakarta, Indonesia Young families’ space adaptation in subsidized housing case study: Mataram city, West Nusa Tenggara Indonesia Spatial planning of China’s lower-tier cities: strategies, implementation, and consequences Spatial planning of China’s lower-tier cities: strategies, implementation, and consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1