Water Polo Performance Classification Based on the Functional Test for Agility Performance: A Long-Term Training Tool

Q3 Health Professions Open Sports Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.2174/1875399x02114010132
Guilherme Tucher, S. Telles, Ricardo Gomes Cabral, N. Garrido, F. A. de Souza Castro
{"title":"Water Polo Performance Classification Based on the Functional Test for Agility Performance: A Long-Term Training Tool","authors":"Guilherme Tucher, S. Telles, Ricardo Gomes Cabral, N. Garrido, F. A. de Souza Castro","doi":"10.2174/1875399x02114010132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Water polo is an open-skilled team sport in which agility is important.\n \n \n \n This study aimed to propose a water polo player classification based on the Functional Test for Agility Performance.\n \n \n \n A total of 78 male water polo players of different competition levels (7.7% regional, 52.5% national and 39.7% international), years of training (6.7 ± 4.5; 2-25 years), weekly training frequency (6.1 ± 2.1; 2-12) and age (18.1 ± 4.3; 12-36) were evaluated in the Functional Test for Agility Performance. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis was used in five levels to classify water polo player performance.\n \n \n \n The players were classified based on the Functional Test for Agility Performance as excellent (≤ 3.22 s), very good (3.23-4.48 s); good (4.49-4.76 s); under development (4.77-5.11 s) and learning (≥ 5.12 s). Age, years of training, and weekly training frequency showed a decreasing trend from Gr1 to Gr4. Athletes at the international level ranked primarily in the best performing groups (Gr1 and Gr2, n = 30), the ones at the national level in the intermediate groups (Gr2, Gr3 and Gr4; n = 41), with a higher concentration in Gr2, and those at regional level mainly in Gr4 (n = 4).\n \n \n \n This classification proposal is expected to be useful as a tool to evaluate the training of athletes of different competition levels as well as to follow up on water polo athletes in long-term training.\n","PeriodicalId":38865,"journal":{"name":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x02114010132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Water polo is an open-skilled team sport in which agility is important. This study aimed to propose a water polo player classification based on the Functional Test for Agility Performance. A total of 78 male water polo players of different competition levels (7.7% regional, 52.5% national and 39.7% international), years of training (6.7 ± 4.5; 2-25 years), weekly training frequency (6.1 ± 2.1; 2-12) and age (18.1 ± 4.3; 12-36) were evaluated in the Functional Test for Agility Performance. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis was used in five levels to classify water polo player performance. The players were classified based on the Functional Test for Agility Performance as excellent (≤ 3.22 s), very good (3.23-4.48 s); good (4.49-4.76 s); under development (4.77-5.11 s) and learning (≥ 5.12 s). Age, years of training, and weekly training frequency showed a decreasing trend from Gr1 to Gr4. Athletes at the international level ranked primarily in the best performing groups (Gr1 and Gr2, n = 30), the ones at the national level in the intermediate groups (Gr2, Gr3 and Gr4; n = 41), with a higher concentration in Gr2, and those at regional level mainly in Gr4 (n = 4). This classification proposal is expected to be useful as a tool to evaluate the training of athletes of different competition levels as well as to follow up on water polo athletes in long-term training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于敏捷性能功能测试的水球性能分类:一种长期训练工具
水球是一项开放式技术团体运动,敏捷性是很重要的。本研究旨在提出一种基于敏捷性功能测试的水球运动员分类方法。不同比赛水平的男子水球运动员78人(地区占7.7%,全国占52.5%,国际占39.7%),训练年限(6.7±4.5;2-25岁),每周培训频次(6.1±2.1;2-12岁)和年龄(18.1±4.3;12-36)在敏捷性能功能测试中进行评估。采用层次聚类分析对水球运动员的表现进行了五个层次的分类。根据敏捷性能功能测试将运动员分为优秀(≤3.22 s)、非常好(3.23-4.48 s);良好(4.49-4.76秒);发育中(4.77 ~ 5.11 s)和学习中(≥5.12 s)。从Gr1到Gr4,年龄、训练年数和每周训练频次呈下降趋势。国际级运动员以优异组(Gr1、Gr2, n = 30)为主,国家级运动员以中间组(Gr2、Gr3、Gr4)为主;n = 41),其中Gr2集中程度较高,区域层面主要集中在Gr4 (n = 4)。该分类方案有望作为评价不同竞技水平运动员训练的工具,以及对水球运动员长期训练的跟踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Sports Sciences Journal
Open Sports Sciences Journal Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Different Smoothing Window Lengths can Estimate the Neuromuscular Fatigue Threshold at The same Intensity of the Lactate Threshold During the Leg Press Exercise Different Smoothing Window Lengths can Estimate the Neuromuscular Fatigue Threshold at The same Intensity of the Lactate Threshold During the Leg Press Exercise Attitudes towards LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Canadian Figure Skating The Post-Exercise Lower Limbs Recovery Process: A Questionnaire Applied To Physiotherapists Inflammatory Indices During and After a Randomized Controlled Trial on Exercise in Old Adults: Could Moderate-Intensity Exercise Be Safe Enough? (Active Elderly and Health – Clinicaltrials.Gov, Nct03858114)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1