Evaluation of Compounding Sterile Preparations for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients in "X" Hospital Semarang City, Indonesia

Melviya Sudianto, Dina Christin Ayuningputri, S. Yuliani
{"title":"Evaluation of Compounding Sterile Preparations for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients in \"X\" Hospital Semarang City, Indonesia","authors":"Melviya Sudianto, Dina Christin Ayuningputri, S. Yuliani","doi":"10.22146/JMPF.34783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compounding sterile preparation, especially for hospitalized pediatric patients, needs more concern due to dose adjustment. Things to be concerned about are compounding personnel, utilization of aseptic technique, and facilitation that affects the quality of sterile preparations. The aims of this study were to observe compounding process and to quality the sterile preparations for hospitalized pediatric patients in “X” Hospital, Semarang City, Indonesia. This research is an observational analitic with incidentally sampling research. Subject in this research was personnel who performed sterile preparations for hospitalized pediatric patients. Results from 114 sterile preparations which were observed in pediatric ward showed that compounding personnel (100%), facilities & infrastuctures, and sterile preparations procedure were not suitable with the Mixing Guideline for injectable drug and cytostatic (2009), hence it could impact the quality of sterile preparations. In addition, even after implementing appropriate solvent, compounding procedures, and aseptic technique had been utilized (100%), the physical incompatibility occurred was 8.77%. The pH of Ceftriaxone and Cefotaxime was similar with those in the literature, but for Omeprazole’s pH and based on sterility test, there were no bacterial growth.","PeriodicalId":33008,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JMPF.34783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Compounding sterile preparation, especially for hospitalized pediatric patients, needs more concern due to dose adjustment. Things to be concerned about are compounding personnel, utilization of aseptic technique, and facilitation that affects the quality of sterile preparations. The aims of this study were to observe compounding process and to quality the sterile preparations for hospitalized pediatric patients in “X” Hospital, Semarang City, Indonesia. This research is an observational analitic with incidentally sampling research. Subject in this research was personnel who performed sterile preparations for hospitalized pediatric patients. Results from 114 sterile preparations which were observed in pediatric ward showed that compounding personnel (100%), facilities & infrastuctures, and sterile preparations procedure were not suitable with the Mixing Guideline for injectable drug and cytostatic (2009), hence it could impact the quality of sterile preparations. In addition, even after implementing appropriate solvent, compounding procedures, and aseptic technique had been utilized (100%), the physical incompatibility occurred was 8.77%. The pH of Ceftriaxone and Cefotaxime was similar with those in the literature, but for Omeprazole’s pH and based on sterility test, there were no bacterial growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚三宝垄市“X”医院住院儿科患者配制无菌制剂的评价
由于剂量调整,配制无菌制剂,尤其是住院儿科患者,需要更多关注。需要关注的是配制人员、无菌技术的使用以及影响无菌制剂质量的便利性。本研究的目的是观察印度尼西亚三宝垄市“X”医院住院儿科患者的配制过程和无菌制剂的质量。这项研究是一项偶然抽样的观察性分析研究。本研究的受试者是为住院儿科患者进行无菌准备的人员。在儿科病房观察到的114种无菌制剂的结果表明,配制人员(100%)、设施和基础设施以及无菌制剂程序不符合《注射药物和细胞抑制剂混合指南》(2009),因此可能会影响无菌制剂的质量。此外,即使在使用了适当的溶剂、配制程序和无菌技术(100%)后,发生的物理不相容性为8.77%。头孢曲松和头孢噻肟的pH值与文献中的pH值相似,但奥美拉唑的pH值和无菌检测结果显示,没有细菌生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Cycle Threshold RT-PCR SARS Cov-2 between Saliva Specimen and Nasopharyngeal Swab Survei Kesediaan Menggunakan Telemedicine Pada Mahasiswa Farmasi Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta THE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY CULTURE AMONG DOCTORS, NURSES AND PHARMACISTS IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN INDONESIA Factor Affecting Job Satisfaction In Community Pharmacists: A Review Pengetahuan Masyarakat Tentang Penggunaan Suplemen Vitamin untuk Meningkatkan Imunitas Tubuh Selama Pandemi COVID-19 di Kelurahan Klender, Jakarta Timur dan Kecamatan Panimbang, Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1