Comparison of Roth and McLaughlin-Bennet-Trevisi prescriptions as two popular pre-adjusted orthodontic bracket systems: a systematic review

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontic Waves Pub Date : 2020-06-17 DOI:10.1080/13440241.2020.1777798

Parastoo Namdar, Erfan Bardideh, Farzaneh Lal Alizadeh, A. Jahanbin, N. Eslami

{"title":"Comparison of Roth and McLaughlin-Bennet-Trevisi prescriptions as two popular pre-adjusted orthodontic bracket systems: a systematic review","authors":"Parastoo Namdar, Erfan Bardideh, Farzaneh Lal Alizadeh, A. Jahanbin, N. Eslami","doi":"10.1080/13440241.2020.1777798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the available evidence on the use of MBT and Roth prescriptions as fixed orthodontic appliances. Search methods Following the seven stage recommended in the Cochrane Handbook, this systematic review was conducted by searching five electronic databases, including Google scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science and Scopus from the beginning to 2020 were searched. The reference lists of the related studies were also hand searched. Results The search process resulted in the identification of 107 papers, 104 and 3 cases of which were obtained through electronic and manual searches, respectively. After the removal of the duplicates and unrelated articles in the initial screening, 91 studies were remained to be screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The second screening led to the inclusion of nine papers in the study. Conclusion Our systematic review was indicative of the lack of sufficient information regarding the efficiency of MBT and Roth prescriptions to support the evidence-based clinical use of one of these prescriptions for fixed orthodontic appliances.","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"79 1","pages":"65 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13440241.2020.1777798","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1777798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the available evidence on the use of MBT and Roth prescriptions as fixed orthodontic appliances. Search methods Following the seven stage recommended in the Cochrane Handbook, this systematic review was conducted by searching five electronic databases, including Google scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science and Scopus from the beginning to 2020 were searched. The reference lists of the related studies were also hand searched. Results The search process resulted in the identification of 107 papers, 104 and 3 cases of which were obtained through electronic and manual searches, respectively. After the removal of the duplicates and unrelated articles in the initial screening, 91 studies were remained to be screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The second screening led to the inclusion of nine papers in the study. Conclusion Our systematic review was indicative of the lack of sufficient information regarding the efficiency of MBT and Roth prescriptions to support the evidence-based clinical use of one of these prescriptions for fixed orthodontic appliances.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Roth和McLaughlin Bennet Trevisi处方作为两种流行的预调整正畸托槽系统的比较：系统综述

目的:本系统综述旨在批判性地评估MBT和Roth处方作为固定正畸矫治器的可用证据。按照Cochrane手册推荐的7个阶段，本系统综述通过检索谷歌scholar、PubMed、Cochrane Effects Reviews Abstracts Database、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、ISI Web of Science和Scopus 5个电子数据库进行，检索时间从年初到2020年。同时手工检索相关研究的参考文献表。结果检索过程中共鉴定论文107篇，其中电子检索104篇，人工检索3篇。在初始筛选中剔除重复和不相关的文章后，根据纳入和排除标准，仍有91项研究有待筛选。第二次筛选导致九篇论文被纳入研究。结论我们的系统综述表明，缺乏足够的关于MBT和Roth处方的有效性的信息，以支持其中一种处方用于固定正畸矫治器的循证临床应用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.