In Too Deep: Class and Mothering in a Flooded Community

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/00943061231181317r
Larry G. Morton II
{"title":"In Too Deep: Class and Mothering in a Flooded Community","authors":"Larry G. Morton II","doi":"10.1177/00943061231181317r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"point to finish the paragraph discussing other studies that note that \"long driving\" impacts the liver and that there are health tolls. But then the focus in the following paragraph turns to 2019 ADA suits against Uber and Lyft. Maybe there are no answers to these questions. But since the researchers were at the NYTWA, perhaps someone in charge of the archives, or a New York City oncologist, could explain the potential link? Or perhaps they should not even raise the questions, just note that this document suggested that driving led to more considerable health concerns than previously expected? I also found the conclusion, subtitled \"Drivers in the Time of COVID-19,\" to be somewhat misleading. There’s much more focus on California’s AB-5, which presumed workers to be employees rather than independent contractors, and the resulting Proposition 22 (which created a third category of worker outside the dichotomy of 1099 and W-2 classification). AB-5 did go into effect at the start of 2020, but describing this chapter as focusing on the Covid impact—especially when there’s minimal mention of this—feels odd. There’s much more focus on the pandemic in Chapter Two, on financializing drivers’ lives, than in this final chapter. Those concerns aside, I found this book to be an interesting read that provides a unique framework for examining the exploitation of drivers’ labor—and selves—in the Uber economy.","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"350 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231181317r","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

point to finish the paragraph discussing other studies that note that "long driving" impacts the liver and that there are health tolls. But then the focus in the following paragraph turns to 2019 ADA suits against Uber and Lyft. Maybe there are no answers to these questions. But since the researchers were at the NYTWA, perhaps someone in charge of the archives, or a New York City oncologist, could explain the potential link? Or perhaps they should not even raise the questions, just note that this document suggested that driving led to more considerable health concerns than previously expected? I also found the conclusion, subtitled "Drivers in the Time of COVID-19," to be somewhat misleading. There’s much more focus on California’s AB-5, which presumed workers to be employees rather than independent contractors, and the resulting Proposition 22 (which created a third category of worker outside the dichotomy of 1099 and W-2 classification). AB-5 did go into effect at the start of 2020, but describing this chapter as focusing on the Covid impact—especially when there’s minimal mention of this—feels odd. There’s much more focus on the pandemic in Chapter Two, on financializing drivers’ lives, than in this final chapter. Those concerns aside, I found this book to be an interesting read that provides a unique framework for examining the exploitation of drivers’ labor—and selves—in the Uber economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在太深:在一个被洪水淹没的社区阶级和母亲
在讨论其他研究时指出,“长时间驾驶”会影响肝脏,并会导致健康损失。但随后,下一段的焦点转向2019年ADA对优步和Lyft的诉讼。也许这些问题没有答案。但由于研究人员在纽约环球航空公司,也许档案馆的负责人或纽约市的肿瘤学家可以解释这种潜在的联系?或者,他们甚至不应该提出这些问题,只是注意到这份文件表明,驾驶导致的健康问题比之前预期的更严重?我还发现这个副标题为“新冠肺炎时代的司机”的结论有点误导。人们更多地关注加利福尼亚州的AB-5,该法案认为工人是雇员,而不是独立承包商,以及由此产生的22号提案(该提案创建了1099和W-2分类之外的第三类工人)。AB-5确实在2020年初生效,但将本章描述为专注于新冠肺炎的影响,尤其是在很少提及这种母乳的情况下。与最后一章相比,第二章更关注疫情,关注司机生活的金融化。抛开这些担忧不谈,我发现这本书是一本有趣的读物,它为研究优步经济中对司机劳动力和自我的剥削提供了一个独特的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊最新文献
How the Clinic Made Gender: The Medical History of a Transformative Idea Prisons of Debt: The Afterlives of Incarcerated Fathers Working-Class Kids Photographing Childhood: Valuing Care, Reciprocity, Sociality, and Dignity Literature in the Dawn of Sociological Theory: Stories That Are Telling On Expertise: Cultivating Character, Goodwill, and Practical Wisdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1