{"title":"ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems.","authors":"Bala Muralikrishnan, Meghan Shilling, Vincent Lee","doi":"10.6028/jres.126.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A documentary standard produced by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for performance evaluation of industrial X-ray computed tomography (XCT) systems for dimensional measurements was released in early 2021. This standard, ASME B89.4.23-2020, specifies test procedures that may be performed to determine whether a system meets the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for acceptance before or after purchase, or for periodic reverification. While there are some core testing requirements in the standard, there is also some flexibility, allowing for a variety of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the standard. It is important that the chosen testing configuration be sensitive to the different systematic sources of error in XCT systems to provide confidence that the system will meet the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for measurements performed by the user subsequent to testing. In this paper, we provide guidance on how to optimally apply the ASME 89.4.23 standard in industry to achieve high sensitivity to geometry errors in cone-beam XCT systems. Through simulation studies, we present some examples of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the ASME B89.4.23 standard and discuss their sensitivity to geometry errors of the detector and the rotation stage. We show that there are some testing configurations that achieve maximal sensitivity to these errors, while other configurations do not capture these error sources with adequate sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"126042"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A documentary standard produced by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for performance evaluation of industrial X-ray computed tomography (XCT) systems for dimensional measurements was released in early 2021. This standard, ASME B89.4.23-2020, specifies test procedures that may be performed to determine whether a system meets the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for acceptance before or after purchase, or for periodic reverification. While there are some core testing requirements in the standard, there is also some flexibility, allowing for a variety of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the standard. It is important that the chosen testing configuration be sensitive to the different systematic sources of error in XCT systems to provide confidence that the system will meet the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for measurements performed by the user subsequent to testing. In this paper, we provide guidance on how to optimally apply the ASME 89.4.23 standard in industry to achieve high sensitivity to geometry errors in cone-beam XCT systems. Through simulation studies, we present some examples of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the ASME B89.4.23 standard and discuss their sensitivity to geometry errors of the detector and the rotation stage. We show that there are some testing configurations that achieve maximal sensitivity to these errors, while other configurations do not capture these error sources with adequate sensitivity.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.