Cognitive remediation group therapy compared to mutual aid group therapy for people aging with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: randomized, controlled trial

A. Eaton, Shelley L. Craig, S. Rourke, Teresa L. Sota, John W. McCullagh, B. Fallon, S. Walmsley
{"title":"Cognitive remediation group therapy compared to mutual aid group therapy for people aging with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: randomized, controlled trial","authors":"A. Eaton, Shelley L. Craig, S. Rourke, Teresa L. Sota, John W. McCullagh, B. Fallon, S. Walmsley","doi":"10.1080/01609513.2021.1963389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cognitive impairment is an important comorbidity for people aging with HIV, and group therapy may ameliorate the associated anxiety and stress. Combination psychosocial interventions may have better outcomes than single technique approaches. A pilot, parallel design, two-arm trial randomized people aging with HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) to Cognitive Remediation Group Therapy (Experimental; combination of brain training activities and mindfulness-based stress reduction) or Mutual Aid Group Therapy (Control). Outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and exploratory measures of anxiety, stress, coping, and use of mindfulness and brain training activities. Among 40 contacted participants, 15 replied, 12 recruited, and 10 completed. Assessors confirmed intervention delivery with satisfactory fidelity. The novel arm had statistically significant improvements in stress and mindfulness use compared to control, and brain training and mindfulness use sustained at 3-month follow-up. Requiring a HAND diagnosis made recruitment challenging. Further research should broaden eligibility to people aging with HIV and cognitive challenges.","PeriodicalId":39702,"journal":{"name":"Social Work with Groups","volume":"45 1","pages":"116 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work with Groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2021.1963389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cognitive impairment is an important comorbidity for people aging with HIV, and group therapy may ameliorate the associated anxiety and stress. Combination psychosocial interventions may have better outcomes than single technique approaches. A pilot, parallel design, two-arm trial randomized people aging with HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) to Cognitive Remediation Group Therapy (Experimental; combination of brain training activities and mindfulness-based stress reduction) or Mutual Aid Group Therapy (Control). Outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and exploratory measures of anxiety, stress, coping, and use of mindfulness and brain training activities. Among 40 contacted participants, 15 replied, 12 recruited, and 10 completed. Assessors confirmed intervention delivery with satisfactory fidelity. The novel arm had statistically significant improvements in stress and mindfulness use compared to control, and brain training and mindfulness use sustained at 3-month follow-up. Requiring a HAND diagnosis made recruitment challenging. Further research should broaden eligibility to people aging with HIV and cognitive challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知修复组治疗与互助组治疗对老年hiv相关神经认知障碍患者的比较:随机对照试验
认知障碍是老年HIV感染者的重要合并症,团体治疗可以改善相关的焦虑和压力。综合社会心理干预可能比单一技术方法有更好的结果。一项试点、平行设计、两组试验将老年hiv相关神经认知障碍(HAND)患者随机分配到认知修复组治疗(Experimental;结合大脑训练活动和以正念为基础的减压)或互助团体治疗(控制)。结果是焦虑、压力、应对、正念和大脑训练活动的可行性、可接受性、保真度和探索性测量。在联系的40名参与者中,15人回复,12人招募,10人完成。评估人员确认干预交付具有令人满意的保真度。与对照组相比,新手臂在压力和正念使用方面有统计学上的显著改善,大脑训练和正念使用持续了3个月的随访。需要HAND诊断使得招聘具有挑战性。进一步的研究应将适用范围扩大到老年艾滋病毒感染者和认知障碍患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work with Groups
Social Work with Groups Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Social Work with Groups is a unique quarterly journal of community and clinical practice, and an important reference publication for those in the social work profession who value and seek to understand the small group. The journal addresses the issues of group work in psychiatric, rehabilitative, and multipurpose social work and social service agencies; crisis theory and group work; the use of group programs in clinical and community practice; and basic group competencies for all social work professionals. The contributions reflect a sophisticated knowledge of the use of the group as a learning medium and a highly developed understanding of instructional technology in the teaching of social group work knowledge and skills.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Fathers’ and Men’s Group project formed by Turkish immigrants in Germany Virtual leadership program for adolescents with muscular dystrophy: a process evaluation Remembering two influential advocates for group work Taking action for Athlete wellbeing: strengthening psychosocial support through interactive group work Collaborations then and now (pre- and post-COVID)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1