A multi-criteria decision analysis for the public distribution system of food grains in Indian Punjab: Towards decentralized food policies in developing countries

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2019-11-29 DOI:10.1002/mcda.1698
Abhay K. Grover, Shweta Chopra, Caroline C. Krejci
{"title":"A multi-criteria decision analysis for the public distribution system of food grains in Indian Punjab: Towards decentralized food policies in developing countries","authors":"Abhay K. Grover,&nbsp;Shweta Chopra,&nbsp;Caroline C. Krejci","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2014, the government of the state of Indian Punjab amended its existing system of public distribution of food grains by launching the “new atta-daal (wheat-pulses) scheme”. Instead of distributing subsidized food grains monthly to its underprivileged citizens, the state started distributing grains on a biannual basis (i.e., every 6 months). The state claims that the new system yields logistical and monetary benefits that favour the state treasury; however, beneficiaries have voiced concerns regarding grain handling and one-time payments. To achieve a beneficial outcome for multiple stakeholders with conflicting objectives, a formal analysis of different policy alternatives is necessary. This research paper applies multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate alternative public grain distribution schemes for the district of Ludhiana in Indian Punjab. First, an objectives hierarchy and measures for the decision problem were developed using emergent codes from qualitative data collected via semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and guided conversations with 40 participants representing eight different stakeholders. Using the rank-order method, weights were then assessed to identify the relative importance of these measures. Five feasible grain distribution policy alternatives were generated, and data describing the performance of these alternatives with respect to each measure were collected via Likert scale surveys of over 300 beneficiary households across 14 different villages (rural) and localities (urban) of Ludhiana district in Punjab. Value functions were assigned to each measure to identify the best performing alternative, and sensitivity analysis was performed to establish the robustness of the final solution. Overall, beneficiaries preferred a 6-monthly distribution system with improvements, such as better communication and disciplined distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1698","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In 2014, the government of the state of Indian Punjab amended its existing system of public distribution of food grains by launching the “new atta-daal (wheat-pulses) scheme”. Instead of distributing subsidized food grains monthly to its underprivileged citizens, the state started distributing grains on a biannual basis (i.e., every 6 months). The state claims that the new system yields logistical and monetary benefits that favour the state treasury; however, beneficiaries have voiced concerns regarding grain handling and one-time payments. To achieve a beneficial outcome for multiple stakeholders with conflicting objectives, a formal analysis of different policy alternatives is necessary. This research paper applies multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate alternative public grain distribution schemes for the district of Ludhiana in Indian Punjab. First, an objectives hierarchy and measures for the decision problem were developed using emergent codes from qualitative data collected via semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and guided conversations with 40 participants representing eight different stakeholders. Using the rank-order method, weights were then assessed to identify the relative importance of these measures. Five feasible grain distribution policy alternatives were generated, and data describing the performance of these alternatives with respect to each measure were collected via Likert scale surveys of over 300 beneficiary households across 14 different villages (rural) and localities (urban) of Ludhiana district in Punjab. Value functions were assigned to each measure to identify the best performing alternative, and sensitivity analysis was performed to establish the robustness of the final solution. Overall, beneficiaries preferred a 6-monthly distribution system with improvements, such as better communication and disciplined distribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度旁遮普粮食公共分配系统的多标准决策分析:走向发展中国家分散的粮食政策
2014年,印度旁遮普邦政府修订了现有的粮食公共分配制度,推出了“新atta-daal(小麦-豆类)计划”。国家不再按月向贫困公民发放补贴粮食,而是每两年(即每6个月)发放一次粮食。政府声称,新系统带来的物流和货币利益有利于国库;然而,受益者对粮食处理和一次性付款表示担忧。为了使目标相互冲突的多个利益相关者获得有益的结果,有必要对不同的政策选择进行正式分析。本文应用多准则决策分析对印度旁遮普邦卢迪亚纳地区的公共粮食分配方案进行了评价。首先,通过半结构化访谈、焦点小组讨论和与代表8个不同利益相关者的40名参与者的引导对话收集的定性数据,使用紧急代码开发了决策问题的目标层次结构和度量。使用秩序法,然后评估权重,以确定这些措施的相对重要性。提出了五种可行的粮食分配政策方案,并通过对旁遮普邦卢迪亚纳地区14个不同村庄(农村)和地方(城市)的300多个受益家庭进行李克特量表调查,收集了描述这些方案相对于每项措施的表现的数据。为每个措施分配价值函数,以确定最佳的替代方案,并进行敏感性分析,以建立最终解决方案的稳健性。总的来说,受惠者更喜欢有改进的6个月分配制度,如更好的沟通和有纪律的分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring Sustainable Development Goals: Stepwise Benchmarking Approach Charting the evolutionary conceptual pathway of analytic network process research: A main path analysis Socio-economic strategy for settlement of refugees amidst crisis: The case of Pak-Afghan Refining the PROMETHEE-scoring method: Propositions and an economic freedom assessment Validation, adaptation and application of a multi-criteria decision analysis-based framework for chemotherapeutic agents in Egypt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1