Comparative evaluation of steroid sensitivity in various dermatoses with control group through histopathological examination and patch testing

Ayushi Lodha, S. Someshwar
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of steroid sensitivity in various dermatoses with control group through histopathological examination and patch testing","authors":"Ayushi Lodha, S. Someshwar","doi":"10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_18_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Topical corticosteroids are widely used for treating various dermatoses. People have been self-medicating them for fungal infections, pigmentary disorders, and for many other dermatoses. This overzealous and irrational use of corticosteroid makes individuals susceptible for its adverse effects. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate steroid sensitivity in various dermatoses. Materials and Methods: Patch testing with Indian standard series and corticosteroid series was performed in sixty subjects where thirty patients were cases and thirty were controls. Histopathological examination and As it is (ASIS) were done only for the case group. Patches were applied on the back for 48 h and reading was done on day 2, day 4, and day 7 according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research group grading. Results: The maximum cases were in the age group of 20–30 years (33.3%) while 31–40 years was the most common age range (50%) among controls. Among the case group, 60% were male and 40% were female. Maximum patients affected in the case group were homemakers (36.7%) followed by laborers (13.3%). The case group showed 16.7% positive patch test reactions while none were positive in the control group. Thiomersal was positive in 13.3% of cases and neomycin in 3.3% of cases. ASIS was negative in all cases. Thiomersal is commonly used as a preservative in topical medicaments, cosmetics, and vaccines. Conclusions: Steroid sensitivity is hard to diagnose clinically, thereby causing difficulty in managing such cases. Patch test is a noninvasive gold standard procedure without major adverse effects and helps in treating the dermatoses with appropriate class of corticosteroid by avoiding the suspected allergen.","PeriodicalId":19108,"journal":{"name":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_18_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Topical corticosteroids are widely used for treating various dermatoses. People have been self-medicating them for fungal infections, pigmentary disorders, and for many other dermatoses. This overzealous and irrational use of corticosteroid makes individuals susceptible for its adverse effects. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate steroid sensitivity in various dermatoses. Materials and Methods: Patch testing with Indian standard series and corticosteroid series was performed in sixty subjects where thirty patients were cases and thirty were controls. Histopathological examination and As it is (ASIS) were done only for the case group. Patches were applied on the back for 48 h and reading was done on day 2, day 4, and day 7 according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research group grading. Results: The maximum cases were in the age group of 20–30 years (33.3%) while 31–40 years was the most common age range (50%) among controls. Among the case group, 60% were male and 40% were female. Maximum patients affected in the case group were homemakers (36.7%) followed by laborers (13.3%). The case group showed 16.7% positive patch test reactions while none were positive in the control group. Thiomersal was positive in 13.3% of cases and neomycin in 3.3% of cases. ASIS was negative in all cases. Thiomersal is commonly used as a preservative in topical medicaments, cosmetics, and vaccines. Conclusions: Steroid sensitivity is hard to diagnose clinically, thereby causing difficulty in managing such cases. Patch test is a noninvasive gold standard procedure without major adverse effects and helps in treating the dermatoses with appropriate class of corticosteroid by avoiding the suspected allergen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过组织病理学检查和贴片试验比较评价不同皮肤病患者与对照组的类固醇敏感性
背景:外用皮质类固醇广泛用于治疗各种皮肤病。人们一直在自我治疗真菌感染、色素性疾病和许多其他皮肤病。这种过度和不合理地使用皮质类固醇使个人容易受到其不良影响。目的:本研究的目的是评估类固醇在各种皮肤病中的敏感性。材料和方法:采用印度标准系列和皮质类固醇系列对60名受试者进行贴片试验,其中30名患者为病例,30名为对照。仅对病例组进行组织病理学检查和ASIS检查。根据国际接触性皮炎研究小组的分级,在背部贴上贴片48小时,并在第2天、第4天和第7天进行读数。结果:病例最多的年龄段为20-30岁(33.3%),而对照组中31-40岁是最常见的年龄段(50%)。在病例组中,60%为男性,40%为女性。病例组中受影响的患者最多的是家庭主妇(36.7%),其次是劳工(13.3%)。病例组的贴片试验反应阳性率为16.7%,而对照组没有阳性反应。硫柳汞阳性率为13.3%,新霉素阳性率为3.3%。ASIS在所有病例中均为阴性。硫柳汞通常用作外用药物、化妆品和疫苗中的防腐剂。结论:类固醇敏感性在临床上很难诊断,从而导致难以处理此类病例。贴片试验是一种无严重不良反应的非侵入性金标准程序,通过避免疑似过敏原,有助于用适当种类的皮质类固醇治疗皮肤病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical profile of term neonates requiring intervention for hyperbilirubinemia Evaluation of serum magnesium levels among type 2 diabetes individuals of a South Indian town Knowledge of E-Shram card among the rural population of Kurnool district in Andhra Pradesh: A cross-sectional study Human papilloma virus-related oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: An assessment of histomorphological features Influence of dengue endemicity on malaria identification by automated hematology analyzer – Beckman Coulter LH750: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1