Movement patterns of lesser flamingos Phoeniconaias minor: nomadism or partial migration?

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2020-08-19 DOI:10.2981/wlb.00728
Mattheuns D. Pretorius, Lourens Leeuwner, G. Tate, A. Botha, M. Michael, K. Durgapersad, Kishaylin Chetty
{"title":"Movement patterns of lesser flamingos Phoeniconaias minor: nomadism or partial migration?","authors":"Mattheuns D. Pretorius, Lourens Leeuwner, G. Tate, A. Botha, M. Michael, K. Durgapersad, Kishaylin Chetty","doi":"10.2981/wlb.00728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waterbirds in stochastic environments exhibit nomadism in order to cater for the unpredictable availability of water resources. Lesser flamingos Phoeniconaias minor have long been thought to be nomadic waterbirds. In southern Africa, conservation efforts for lesser flamingos are hampered by a lack of knowledge about their movement trajectories. To investigate their movement ecology in southern Africa, we fitted GPS–GSM transmitters to 12 adults and tracked their movements over four years, from March 2016 to February 2020. Net squared displacement (NSD) was used in nonlinear least squares models classifying trajectories as nomadic, migratory, mixed-migratory, home range restricted or dispersal movement types. Data from eight of the 12 birds met the criteria for the NSD analysis. Model success was good; only 8 out of 120 (6.7%) movement type models failed to reach convergence. Goodness of fit statistics from the NSD models supported migratory and mixed migratory movement types (concordance criteria coefficient (CC) = 0.78) for more than half of the annual trajectories investigated (57.2%). Dispersal, home range-restricted and nomadic movements best described 28.6, 9.5 and 4.8% of annual trajectories, respectively, but all resulted in a mean CC of < 0.4 and thus did not fit observed NSD patterns as well as the migratory movement types. We then used nonlinear mixed effects models to account for annual and individual differences in migration parameters. Variation in the timing and duration of all migrations were more important than variation in migration distance, indicating well-established summer and winter ‘ranges’ and routes between Kamfers Dam (South Africa) and Sua Pan (Botswana). We propose that lesser flamingos in central southern Africa may be partial migrants, not true nomads, as most of their movements followed a regular, repeated pattern between two primary locations.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Waterbirds in stochastic environments exhibit nomadism in order to cater for the unpredictable availability of water resources. Lesser flamingos Phoeniconaias minor have long been thought to be nomadic waterbirds. In southern Africa, conservation efforts for lesser flamingos are hampered by a lack of knowledge about their movement trajectories. To investigate their movement ecology in southern Africa, we fitted GPS–GSM transmitters to 12 adults and tracked their movements over four years, from March 2016 to February 2020. Net squared displacement (NSD) was used in nonlinear least squares models classifying trajectories as nomadic, migratory, mixed-migratory, home range restricted or dispersal movement types. Data from eight of the 12 birds met the criteria for the NSD analysis. Model success was good; only 8 out of 120 (6.7%) movement type models failed to reach convergence. Goodness of fit statistics from the NSD models supported migratory and mixed migratory movement types (concordance criteria coefficient (CC) = 0.78) for more than half of the annual trajectories investigated (57.2%). Dispersal, home range-restricted and nomadic movements best described 28.6, 9.5 and 4.8% of annual trajectories, respectively, but all resulted in a mean CC of < 0.4 and thus did not fit observed NSD patterns as well as the migratory movement types. We then used nonlinear mixed effects models to account for annual and individual differences in migration parameters. Variation in the timing and duration of all migrations were more important than variation in migration distance, indicating well-established summer and winter ‘ranges’ and routes between Kamfers Dam (South Africa) and Sua Pan (Botswana). We propose that lesser flamingos in central southern Africa may be partial migrants, not true nomads, as most of their movements followed a regular, repeated pattern between two primary locations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小火烈鸟Phoeniconaias minor的运动模式:游牧还是部分迁徙?
随机环境中的水鸟表现出游牧性,以满足水资源不可预测的可用性。小火烈鸟Phoeniconaias minor一直被认为是游牧水鸟。在南部非洲,由于对小型火烈鸟的运动轨迹缺乏了解,保护工作受到阻碍。为了调查它们在南部非洲的运动生态,我们为12名成年人安装了GPS–GSM发射器,并在2016年3月至2020年2月的四年时间里跟踪了它们的运动。净平方位移(NSD)用于非线性最小二乘模型,将轨迹分为游牧、迁徙、混合迁徙、家园范围受限或分散运动类型。12只鸟中有8只的数据符合NSD分析的标准。模型的成功是好的;120个运动型模型中只有8个(6.7%)未能达到收敛。NSD模型的拟合优度统计数据支持了超过一半的年度调查轨迹(57.2%)的迁徙和混合迁徙类型(一致性标准系数(CC)=0.78)。分散、限制迁徙和游牧迁徙分别最好地描述了28.6%、9.5%和4.8%的年度轨迹,但所有这些都导致平均CC<0.4,因此不符合观察到的NSD模式以及迁徙类型。然后,我们使用非线性混合效应模型来解释迁移参数的年度和个人差异。所有迁徙时间和持续时间的变化比迁徙距离的变化更重要,这表明Kamfers Dam(南非)和Sua Pan(博茨瓦纳)之间的夏季和冬季“范围”和路线已经确定。我们认为,中南部非洲较小的火烈鸟可能是部分迁徙者,而不是真正的游牧民族,因为它们的大部分迁徙都遵循着两个主要地点之间的规律和重复模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
期刊最新文献
Wind energy development can lead to guild‐specific habitat loss in boreal forest bats Lying deadwood retention affects microhabitat use of martens (Martes spp.) in European mountain forests Evaluating population persistence of ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata) at the northeast edge of their distribution Epidemiological landscape of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and its impact on amphibian diversity at global scale Diet analysis of Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus) based on stable isotope analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1