Challenges in Designing Personalised Learning Paths in SPOCs

Anne Kristine Petersen, Peter Gundersen
{"title":"Challenges in Designing Personalised Learning Paths in SPOCs","authors":"Anne Kristine Petersen, Peter Gundersen","doi":"10.16993/DFL.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the challenges of designing personalised learning paths in SPOCs (Small Private Online Courses). It opens with a discussion on different approaches to tailoring teaching to individual needs and moves on to introduce a SPOC that was developed for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for primary and lower-secondary teachers in Denmark. The SPOC, which performs adaptation using a recommendation system, allows for students to create a personalised learning path on the basis of three components: a learner profile, a content model and an adaptation model. Using the three components as a starting point, the SPOC is analysed in order to identify differences between the intended design (what the SPOC set out to do), the implemented design (how the SPOC is used by its users) and the attained design (the outcome of the SPOC). The analysis draws on data from a series of semi-structured interviews with SPOC students and their lecturers. We find that the implemented design deviates from the intended design in several respects, most notably in relation to how the personalised learning paths are created and how decisions as to curriculum contents are made. Moreover, it is suggested that differences between the intended design and the implemented design are rooted in differences in the learning perspectives of the students, the lecturers and the educational designers of the SPOC. Despite the fact that the implemented design deviates from the intended design, the attained design is nevertheless successful in that a high percentage of the students enrolled succeeded in passing their examinations and thus obtained the formal qualifications in the subjects they teach. It is concluded that further research in adaptive learning designs for online platforms such as MOOCs (Massive Open Online Course) and SPOCs is needed to minimise the gap between intended designs and implemented designs in order to create a more personalised learning experience for the students involved.","PeriodicalId":31187,"journal":{"name":"Designs for Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs for Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/DFL.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The paper explores the challenges of designing personalised learning paths in SPOCs (Small Private Online Courses). It opens with a discussion on different approaches to tailoring teaching to individual needs and moves on to introduce a SPOC that was developed for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for primary and lower-secondary teachers in Denmark. The SPOC, which performs adaptation using a recommendation system, allows for students to create a personalised learning path on the basis of three components: a learner profile, a content model and an adaptation model. Using the three components as a starting point, the SPOC is analysed in order to identify differences between the intended design (what the SPOC set out to do), the implemented design (how the SPOC is used by its users) and the attained design (the outcome of the SPOC). The analysis draws on data from a series of semi-structured interviews with SPOC students and their lecturers. We find that the implemented design deviates from the intended design in several respects, most notably in relation to how the personalised learning paths are created and how decisions as to curriculum contents are made. Moreover, it is suggested that differences between the intended design and the implemented design are rooted in differences in the learning perspectives of the students, the lecturers and the educational designers of the SPOC. Despite the fact that the implemented design deviates from the intended design, the attained design is nevertheless successful in that a high percentage of the students enrolled succeeded in passing their examinations and thus obtained the formal qualifications in the subjects they teach. It is concluded that further research in adaptive learning designs for online platforms such as MOOCs (Massive Open Online Course) and SPOCs is needed to minimise the gap between intended designs and implemented designs in order to create a more personalised learning experience for the students involved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在spoc中设计个性化学习路径的挑战
本文探讨了在SPOCs(小型私人在线课程)中设计个性化学习路径的挑战。它首先讨论了针对个人需求量身定制教学的不同方法,然后介绍了为丹麦小学和初中教师的持续专业发展(CPD)开发的SPOC。SPOC使用推荐系统进行适应,允许学生在三个组成部分的基础上创建个性化的学习路径:学习者概况,内容模型和适应模型。以这三个组成部分为起点,对SPOC进行分析,以确定预期设计(SPOC打算做什么)、实现设计(用户如何使用SPOC)和实现设计(SPOC的结果)之间的差异。该分析利用了对SPOC学生及其讲师进行的一系列半结构化访谈的数据。我们发现,实施的设计在几个方面偏离了预期的设计,最明显的是如何创建个性化的学习路径以及如何制定课程内容的决策。预期设计与实施设计之间的差异源于学生、教师和SPOC教育设计师的学习视角的差异。尽管实施的设计偏离了预期的设计,但达到的设计仍然是成功的,因为入学的学生中有很高的比例成功地通过了考试,从而获得了他们所教科目的正式资格。结论是,需要进一步研究mooc(大规模开放在线课程)和spoc等在线平台的自适应学习设计,以最大限度地减少预期设计和实施设计之间的差距,从而为参与其中的学生创造更加个性化的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Students’ Multimodal Texts in the Subject of English: Synthesising Peers’ and Teachers’ Recognition of Semiotic Work App-Genres for Children’s Agency – Affordances in Applications Used in Preschool Design Sprint Workshops – Exploring a Data-Based Method in Mathematics Education Motivational Factors for Empowering People with Diabetes and the Influence of Perceived Self-Efficacy Editorial for the Special Collection: Remediation of Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1