Preliminary Outcomes from an Intensive Multidisciplinary Pain Program in a Veteran’s Administration Hospital: A Pilot Study

Q2 Social Sciences Military Behavioral Health Pub Date : 2022-01-27 DOI:10.1080/21635781.2022.2029636
Tara Austin, Randall E. Rogers, C. Hodges, Courtney Kominek, Nicholas C. Madaffer, Jerry Miller, C. Shigaki
{"title":"Preliminary Outcomes from an Intensive Multidisciplinary Pain Program in a Veteran’s Administration Hospital: A Pilot Study","authors":"Tara Austin, Randall E. Rogers, C. Hodges, Courtney Kominek, Nicholas C. Madaffer, Jerry Miller, C. Shigaki","doi":"10.1080/21635781.2022.2029636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Chronic pain is a leading cause of lost productivity, disability payments, and health care utilization among the Veteran population. As such, there is interest in chronic pain treatments that address not only physical functioning and pain, but also psychological functioning and pain-related beliefs. One such treatment that has been explored is multidisciplinary team treatments. This pilot study aimed to determine whether a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic pain would be effective in a sample of primarily rural-based Veterans. Seventy Veterans completed multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment, which consisted of 3–5 hours of pain related services per week for twelve weeks with providers from seven different disciplines. Veterans took standardized pre- and post-test measures of functioning, pain, pain-related beliefs, and mood. The program was highly acceptable and feasible to both Veterans and medical providers. Participants reported statistically significant improvements in average pain level following the intervention and improvements in pain related beliefs, pain-related catastrophizing, pain-related self-efficacy, mood symptoms and increased activity engagement. The program was highly acceptable to participants and feasible to a rural VA medical center, as evidenced by high completion rates. Future research is needed for cost-benefit analysis of the multidisciplinary program compared to less time-intensive pain related services (e.g. CBT-CP), post-intervention pain-related health care utilization, and the role of pain-related beliefs in treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":37012,"journal":{"name":"Military Behavioral Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"379 - 388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Behavioral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2022.2029636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Chronic pain is a leading cause of lost productivity, disability payments, and health care utilization among the Veteran population. As such, there is interest in chronic pain treatments that address not only physical functioning and pain, but also psychological functioning and pain-related beliefs. One such treatment that has been explored is multidisciplinary team treatments. This pilot study aimed to determine whether a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic pain would be effective in a sample of primarily rural-based Veterans. Seventy Veterans completed multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment, which consisted of 3–5 hours of pain related services per week for twelve weeks with providers from seven different disciplines. Veterans took standardized pre- and post-test measures of functioning, pain, pain-related beliefs, and mood. The program was highly acceptable and feasible to both Veterans and medical providers. Participants reported statistically significant improvements in average pain level following the intervention and improvements in pain related beliefs, pain-related catastrophizing, pain-related self-efficacy, mood symptoms and increased activity engagement. The program was highly acceptable to participants and feasible to a rural VA medical center, as evidenced by high completion rates. Future research is needed for cost-benefit analysis of the multidisciplinary program compared to less time-intensive pain related services (e.g. CBT-CP), post-intervention pain-related health care utilization, and the role of pain-related beliefs in treatment outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人管理医院强化多学科疼痛项目的初步结果:一项试点研究
摘要慢性疼痛是退伍军人生产力、残疾津贴和医疗保健利用率下降的主要原因。因此,人们对慢性疼痛治疗感兴趣,这种治疗不仅涉及身体功能和疼痛,还涉及心理功能和疼痛相关信念。已经探索的一种治疗方法是多学科团队治疗。这项试点研究旨在确定一项针对慢性疼痛的多学科治疗计划在以农村退伍军人为主的样本中是否有效。70名退伍军人完成了多学科慢性疼痛治疗,包括3-5名 来自七个不同学科的提供者每周提供12周的疼痛相关服务。退伍军人在测试前和测试后对功能、疼痛、疼痛相关信念和情绪进行了标准化测量。该计划对退伍军人和医疗服务提供者来说都是高度可接受和可行的。参与者报告说,干预后平均疼痛水平有统计学显著改善,疼痛相关信念、疼痛相关灾难、疼痛相关自我效能、情绪症状和活动参与度增加也有改善。该项目对参与者来说是高度可接受的,对弗吉尼亚州农村医疗中心来说是可行的,高完成率证明了这一点。与时间密集度较低的疼痛相关服务(如CBT-CP)、干预后疼痛相关的医疗保健利用率以及疼痛相关信念在治疗结果中的作用相比,需要对多学科项目进行成本效益分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Behavioral Health
Military Behavioral Health Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Adjusting to a Partners’ Changed Appearance Following Military Combat-Related Appearance-Altering Injuries: The Challenges of Looking “Different” and How Life Continues Desired Employment and Local Social Support: The Strongest Predictors for Wellbeing Outcomes Amongst the Partners of Australian Military Members Implementation of a Supervisor-Led Resilience Training Extension in the Royal Military College Resilient Coping and the Psychometric Properties of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) Among Healthy Young Men at Military Call-up Importance of Military Identity in Understanding the Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Adverse Family Functioning for Post-9/11 Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1