Adding Value to Second-Language Listening and Reading Subscores: Using a Score Augmentation Approach

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2018-01-04 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2017.1407766
S. Papageorgiou, Ikkyu Choi
{"title":"Adding Value to Second-Language Listening and Reading Subscores: Using a Score Augmentation Approach","authors":"S. Papageorgiou, Ikkyu Choi","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2017.1407766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined whether reporting subscores for groups of items within a test section assessing a second-language modality (specifically reading or listening comprehension) added value from a measurement perspective to the information already provided by the section scores. We analyzed the responses of 116,489 test takers to reading and listening items from operational administrations of two large-scale international tests of English as a foreign language. To “strengthen” the reliability of the subscores, and thus improve their added value, we applied a score augmentation method (Haberman, 2008). In doing so, our aim was to examine whether reporting augmented subscores for specific groups of reading and listening items could improve the added value of these subscores and consequently justify providing more fine-grained information about test taker performance. Our analysis indicated that in general, there was lack of support for reporting subscores from a psychometric perspective, and that score augmentation marginally improved the added value of the subscores. We discuss several implications of our findings for test developers wishing to report more fine-grained information about test performance. We conclude by arguing that research on how to best report such refined feedback should remain the focus of future efforts related to second-language proficiency tests.","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":"18 1","pages":"207 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15305058.2017.1407766","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1407766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study examined whether reporting subscores for groups of items within a test section assessing a second-language modality (specifically reading or listening comprehension) added value from a measurement perspective to the information already provided by the section scores. We analyzed the responses of 116,489 test takers to reading and listening items from operational administrations of two large-scale international tests of English as a foreign language. To “strengthen” the reliability of the subscores, and thus improve their added value, we applied a score augmentation method (Haberman, 2008). In doing so, our aim was to examine whether reporting augmented subscores for specific groups of reading and listening items could improve the added value of these subscores and consequently justify providing more fine-grained information about test taker performance. Our analysis indicated that in general, there was lack of support for reporting subscores from a psychometric perspective, and that score augmentation marginally improved the added value of the subscores. We discuss several implications of our findings for test developers wishing to report more fine-grained information about test performance. We conclude by arguing that research on how to best report such refined feedback should remain the focus of future efforts related to second-language proficiency tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加第二语言听力和阅读分数的价值:使用分数增加法
本研究考察了在评估第二语言模态(特别是阅读或听力理解)的测试部分中报告项目组的子分数是否从测量的角度增加了部分分数已经提供的信息的价值。我们分析了116,489名考生对两次大型国际英语作为外语考试的阅读和听力项目的反应。为了“加强”子分数的可靠性,从而提高它们的附加值,我们采用了分数增强法(Haberman, 2008)。在这样做的过程中,我们的目的是检验报告特定组的阅读和听力项目的增加子分数是否可以提高这些子分数的附加值,从而证明提供更多关于考生表现的细粒度信息是合理的。我们的分析表明,总的来说,从心理测量学的角度来看,缺乏对报告子分数的支持,分数增加略微提高了子分数的附加值。对于希望报告有关测试性能的更细粒度信息的测试开发人员,我们讨论了我们的发现的几个含义。最后,我们认为研究如何最好地报告这种精炼的反馈应该是未来第二语言能力测试的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Testing
International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Combining Mokken Scale Analysis with and rasch measurement theory to explore differences in measurement quality between subgroups Examining the construct validity of the MIDUS version of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Beyond group comparisons: Accounting for intersectional sources of bias in international survey measures Can the dark core of personality be measured briefly, multidimensionally, and invariantly? The D25 measure Investigating the acquiescent responding impact in empathy measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1