Design Philosophy and Poetic Thinking: Peter Sloterdijk’s Metaphorical Explorations of the Interior

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Human Ecology Review Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.22459/HER.24.02.2018.08
Tom Lee, Rachael Wakefield-Rann
{"title":"Design Philosophy and Poetic Thinking: Peter Sloterdijk’s Metaphorical Explorations of the Interior","authors":"Tom Lee, Rachael Wakefield-Rann","doi":"10.22459/HER.24.02.2018.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article makes the argument that Peter Sloterdijk’s philosophy provides a useful and thought-provoking basis for studies of contemporary indoor ecologies. Sloterdijk’s philosophy is distinctively attentive to the various environments in which humans exist and of the ecological situation of beings in general. The notions of interiority explored in Sloterdijk’s work, particularly the third volume of his spheres trilogy Spheres III: Foams (2004, 2016), provide important tools for conceptualizing the changing nature of indoor spaces and contemporary modes of being in the world. Sloterdijk’s approach to philosophical analysis exhibits a number of interrelated advantages that mesh well with the ambitions of human ecology, particularly in relation to indoor ecological conditions. These include his sustained conceptual exploration of technological and scientific developments, his distinctive use of rhetoric and philosophy in the characterization of human agency, and the close attention he pays to the relationship between being and design. This article unpacks the value of these perspectives through a sustained attention to Spheres III: Foams and aims to demonstrate why Sloterdijk’s work provides an invaluable philosophical tool kit to foreground and unite scholarship in diverse fields exploring the relationship between interior spaces, human perception, and society.","PeriodicalId":46896,"journal":{"name":"Human Ecology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Ecology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.24.02.2018.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article makes the argument that Peter Sloterdijk’s philosophy provides a useful and thought-provoking basis for studies of contemporary indoor ecologies. Sloterdijk’s philosophy is distinctively attentive to the various environments in which humans exist and of the ecological situation of beings in general. The notions of interiority explored in Sloterdijk’s work, particularly the third volume of his spheres trilogy Spheres III: Foams (2004, 2016), provide important tools for conceptualizing the changing nature of indoor spaces and contemporary modes of being in the world. Sloterdijk’s approach to philosophical analysis exhibits a number of interrelated advantages that mesh well with the ambitions of human ecology, particularly in relation to indoor ecological conditions. These include his sustained conceptual exploration of technological and scientific developments, his distinctive use of rhetoric and philosophy in the characterization of human agency, and the close attention he pays to the relationship between being and design. This article unpacks the value of these perspectives through a sustained attention to Spheres III: Foams and aims to demonstrate why Sloterdijk’s work provides an invaluable philosophical tool kit to foreground and unite scholarship in diverse fields exploring the relationship between interior spaces, human perception, and society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计哲学与诗意思考:Peter Sloterdijk对室内的隐喻探索
这篇文章认为Peter Sloterdijk的哲学为当代室内生态学的研究提供了一个有用且发人深省的基础。斯洛特戴克的哲学特别关注人类生存的各种环境和一般生物的生态状况。在Sloterdijk的作品中,特别是他的球体三部曲《球体III:泡沫》(2004年,2016年)的第三卷中,探索了内部的概念,为概念化室内空间不断变化的本质和当代世界的存在模式提供了重要的工具。Sloterdijk的哲学分析方法展示了许多相互关联的优势,这些优势与人类生态学的雄心壮志非常吻合,特别是在室内生态条件方面。这些包括他对技术和科学发展的持续的概念探索,他对人类能动性特征的独特运用修辞和哲学,以及他对存在与设计之间关系的密切关注。本文通过对《球体III:泡沫》的持续关注,揭示了这些观点的价值,并旨在证明为什么斯洛特戴克的作品为探索室内空间、人类感知和社会之间关系的不同领域的学术研究提供了宝贵的哲学工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Human Ecology Review (ISSN 1074-4827) is a refereed journal published twice a year by the Society for Human Ecology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed research and theory on the interaction between humans and the environment and other links between culture and nature (Research in Human Ecology), essays and applications relevant to human ecology (Human Ecology Forum), book reviews (Contemporary Human Ecology), and relevant commentary, announcements, and awards (Human Ecology Bulletin).
期刊最新文献
Applicability of the Value–Belief–Norm Model to the Protection of Native Biodiversity in a District of Santiago, Chile Using Human Ecology and Feedback-Guided Analysis to Understand the Relationship Between Ecotourism and Poaching Association of Physical and Sociocultural Aspects of Adolescent Athletes with Sport Development: A Review Lyme Disease Risk Perceptions in New Hampshire, USA: Bridging Regression and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on the Knowledge of Medicinal Plants: A Case Study in the Truká Indigenous Population, Pernambuco, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1