Exploring Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: The Role of Family, Friends, and Procedural Justice

Q1 Social Sciences Criminal Justice Review Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI:10.1177/07340168231159368
W. Morrow, S. Vickovic
{"title":"Exploring Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: The Role of Family, Friends, and Procedural Justice","authors":"W. Morrow, S. Vickovic","doi":"10.1177/07340168231159368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its inception in 1990, Tyler's process-based model of regulation has provided a fundamental framework for understanding why people obey the law. Numerous studies have found support for Tyler's process-based model of regulation, with the majority of research reporting an association between procedural justice and legitimacy. The research is limited, however, in its ability to explain the correlates of legitimacy outside of procedural justice, which is surprising considering research indicates that the development of behaviors and attitudes toward legal institutions and actors is complex. Based on the legal socialization literature, the current study explores how perceptions of police legitimacy may be impacted by family and/or peer views of the police. In order to investigate this relationship, the current exploratory study relies on data from students located at two universities in the United States. The results suggest that family views, peer views, and procedural justice are all significantly related to perceived police legitimacy. These findings are explored and contextualized in the broader literature on police legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231159368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its inception in 1990, Tyler's process-based model of regulation has provided a fundamental framework for understanding why people obey the law. Numerous studies have found support for Tyler's process-based model of regulation, with the majority of research reporting an association between procedural justice and legitimacy. The research is limited, however, in its ability to explain the correlates of legitimacy outside of procedural justice, which is surprising considering research indicates that the development of behaviors and attitudes toward legal institutions and actors is complex. Based on the legal socialization literature, the current study explores how perceptions of police legitimacy may be impacted by family and/or peer views of the police. In order to investigate this relationship, the current exploratory study relies on data from students located at two universities in the United States. The results suggest that family views, peer views, and procedural justice are all significantly related to perceived police legitimacy. These findings are explored and contextualized in the broader literature on police legitimacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索警察合法性的认知:家庭、朋友和程序正义的角色
自1990年创立以来,泰勒基于过程的监管模型为理解人们为什么遵守法律提供了一个基本框架。许多研究都支持泰勒的基于过程的监管模型,大多数研究都报告了程序正义与合法性之间的联系。然而,这项研究在解释程序正义之外的合法性的相关关系方面是有限的,这令人惊讶,因为研究表明,对法律制度和行动者的行为和态度的发展是复杂的。基于法律社会化文献,本研究探讨了对警察合法性的认知如何受到家庭和/或同伴对警察的看法的影响。为了调查这种关系,目前的探索性研究依赖于来自美国两所大学的学生的数据。结果表明,家庭观点、同伴观点和程序正义都与警察合法性感知显著相关。这些发现在更广泛的关于警察合法性的文献中进行了探讨和背景化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminal Justice Review
Criminal Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice Review is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting a broad perspective on criminal justice issues. It focuses on any aspect of crime and the justice system and can feature local, state, or national concerns. Both qualitative and quantitative pieces are encouraged, providing that they adhere to standards of quality scholarship. As a peer-reviewed journal, we encourage the submission of articles, research notes, commentaries, and comprehensive essays that focus on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics.
期刊最新文献
Sex Offender Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned From Over 70 Years of Research. AMBER Alert: An Ironic Antidote to “Missing White Girl Syndrome”? Public Preferences for Mental Health Initiatives to Prevent Crime Book Review: You might go to prison, even though you’re innocent by Brooks, J. Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: Untangling the Effects of Racial and Ethnic Combinations Between the Police and Civilians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1