An Eco-critical Exegesis of Shona Taboos

Godwin Makaudze
{"title":"An Eco-critical Exegesis of Shona Taboos","authors":"Godwin Makaudze","doi":"10.1080/1013929X.2021.1970356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence in Zimbabwe today of organisations and the promulgation of many pieces of legislation all meant to protect various aspects of the environment do not imply that Zimbabwean societies have never kept a positive eye on their environments. Traditional societies, the Shona in this case, have largely been particular about and enjoyed a sound relationship between the people and their environment. This article is an eco-critical exegesis of Shona taboos, known as zviera, with intent to lay bare the positive attitudes and approaches that traditional societies pay to, and inculcate in members towards various aspects of the environment. It observed that traditional Shona societies use taboos as one of the most powerful environmental awareness and conservation genres, wherein human life is shown as hinged on the animal, vegetative and physical environments which are then supposed to be identified, named, meaningfully and economically exploited and safeguarded from pollution, over-extraction and depletion for the well-being of humanity. These findings have a strong bearing on the positives inherent in Shona traditional ways of achieving environmental awareness even in the contemporary world, and on further research.","PeriodicalId":52015,"journal":{"name":"Current Writing-Text and Reception in Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Writing-Text and Reception in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1013929X.2021.1970356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence in Zimbabwe today of organisations and the promulgation of many pieces of legislation all meant to protect various aspects of the environment do not imply that Zimbabwean societies have never kept a positive eye on their environments. Traditional societies, the Shona in this case, have largely been particular about and enjoyed a sound relationship between the people and their environment. This article is an eco-critical exegesis of Shona taboos, known as zviera, with intent to lay bare the positive attitudes and approaches that traditional societies pay to, and inculcate in members towards various aspects of the environment. It observed that traditional Shona societies use taboos as one of the most powerful environmental awareness and conservation genres, wherein human life is shown as hinged on the animal, vegetative and physical environments which are then supposed to be identified, named, meaningfully and economically exploited and safeguarded from pollution, over-extraction and depletion for the well-being of humanity. These findings have a strong bearing on the positives inherent in Shona traditional ways of achieving environmental awareness even in the contemporary world, and on further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《修那禁忌》的生态批判训诂
今天在津巴布韦出现的组织和颁布的许多立法都是为了保护环境的各个方面,但这并不意味着津巴布韦社会从来没有积极关注过他们的环境。传统社会,在这个例子中是修纳人,在很大程度上非常注重并享受人与环境之间的良好关系。这篇文章是对被称为zviera的Shona禁忌的生态批判注释,旨在揭示传统社会对环境的各个方面所付出的积极态度和方法,并向成员灌输。它注意到,传统的Shona社会将禁忌作为最有力的环境意识和保护类型之一,其中人类的生活被显示为依赖于动物、植物和物理环境,然后应该为了人类的福祉而确定、命名、有意义和经济地开发和保护免受污染、过度开采和枯竭。这些发现对在当代世界实现环境意识的Shona传统方式所固有的积极影响以及进一步的研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Current Writing: Text and Reception in Southern Africa is published bi-annually by Routledge. Current Writing focuses on recent writing and re-publication of texts on southern African and (from a ''southern'' perspective) commonwealth and/or postcolonial literature and literary-culture. Works of the past and near-past must be assessed and evaluated through the lens of current reception. Submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed by at least two referees of international stature in the field. The journal is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Education and Training.
期刊最新文献
How the Brubecks Broke an Egg Playing the Changes: At an African University and on the Road War Poetry of the Angolan/Namibian Border War: Re-membering Poetic Bodies through Textual Limbs Rap Music and the Youth in Malawi: Reppin’ the Flames Editor's Notes Narrativity and the Problematics of ‘Authenticity’ in Hungry Ghosts by Kevin Jared Hosein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1