Multimodality, learning and decision-making: children's metacognitive reflections on their engagement with video games as interactive texts

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1111/lit.12304
Sam von Gillern, Carolyn Stufft
{"title":"Multimodality, learning and decision-making: children's metacognitive reflections on their engagement with video games as interactive texts","authors":"Sam von Gillern,&nbsp;Carolyn Stufft","doi":"10.1111/lit.12304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines how 31 middle-school children conducted multimodal analyses of video games. Over four consecutive days, students played video games for 30 minutes and then wrote written reflections about the multimodal symbols within the game and how these symbols influenced their interpretation and decision-making processes during gameplay. Students produced 124 reflections in total, which were analysed via template analysis to determine how children metacognitively reflected on different types of multimodal symbols and used those symbols to comprehend the games and make decisions. Results illustrate how students engaged in metacognitive semantic and syntactic processes with a variety of multimodal symbols, such as written language, dynamic visuals and abstract symbols, during gameplay that aided their understanding of the games and influenced their decisions. This study contributes to the limited empirical research on video game literacies and illustrates children's meaning-making processes while engaged with video games as multimodal interactive texts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"57 1","pages":"3-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.12304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study examines how 31 middle-school children conducted multimodal analyses of video games. Over four consecutive days, students played video games for 30 minutes and then wrote written reflections about the multimodal symbols within the game and how these symbols influenced their interpretation and decision-making processes during gameplay. Students produced 124 reflections in total, which were analysed via template analysis to determine how children metacognitively reflected on different types of multimodal symbols and used those symbols to comprehend the games and make decisions. Results illustrate how students engaged in metacognitive semantic and syntactic processes with a variety of multimodal symbols, such as written language, dynamic visuals and abstract symbols, during gameplay that aided their understanding of the games and influenced their decisions. This study contributes to the limited empirical research on video game literacies and illustrates children's meaning-making processes while engaged with video games as multimodal interactive texts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模态、学习和决策:儿童将电子游戏作为互动文本参与的元认知反思
本研究考察了31名中学生如何对电子游戏进行多模式分析。在连续四天的时间里,学生们玩了30分钟的电子游戏,然后写下关于游戏中的多模态符号以及这些符号如何影响他们在游戏过程中的解释和决策过程的书面反思。学生们总共产生了124个反思,通过模板分析来确定孩子们如何在元认知上反思不同类型的多模态符号,并使用这些符号来理解游戏并做出决定。结果表明,在游戏过程中,学生如何使用各种多模态符号(如书面语言、动态视觉和抽象符号)参与元认知语义和句法过程,从而帮助他们理解游戏并影响他们的决策。本研究有助于对电子游戏素养的有限实证研究,并说明儿童在参与电子游戏作为多模式互动文本时的意义制造过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial: The Writing Realities Framework and new directions in writing research, instruction and learning ‘Something I've carried with me’: Visibility and vulnerability within the writing journeys of preservice secondary English teachers Daybooks: Writers' notebooks reveal the processes, genre choices and reflections of fourth-grade writers Using constructs of ‘good’ writing to develop ‘a voice of one's own’ in the primary school classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1