Effectiveness of bioimpedance spectroscopy on dry weight (DW) measurement in haemodialysis patients: a systematic review

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Renal Society of Australasia Journal Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.33235/RSAJ.15.2.53-63
Hyeyoung Ko, R. Jayasekara, C. Grech
{"title":"Effectiveness of bioimpedance spectroscopy on dry weight (DW) measurement in haemodialysis patients: a systematic review","authors":"Hyeyoung Ko, R. Jayasekara, C. Grech","doi":"10.33235/RSAJ.15.2.53-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To review the effects of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to measure dry weight (DW) in haemodialysis (HD)patients when compared to clinical examination.\nMethods The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MasARI). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 software. The search was limited to English language papers published from 2005 to 2017. A standard JBI three-step search strategy was used. We searched all quantitative studies from major databases for investigations of the BIS for measuring DW in HD patients.\nResults A total of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. These studies all involved patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving HD and the comparison of BIS versus physician’s clinical judgement using cardiovascular parameters and mortality outcomes. The meta-analysis of BIS when compared with clinical judgement found no significant differences in the reduction of the mortality rate, hospitalisation rate or other cardiovascular parameters after 12 months of the intervention; only significant improvement in pre-dialysis systolic BP (WMD –5.41, 95% CI –9.00 to –1.82; p=0.003) was reported. However, individual RCTs found that BIS is an effective intervention for HD patients in the reduction of the mortality rate (HR 0.100, 95% CI, 0.013 to 0.805; p=0.04) after 2.5 years of the intervention.\nConclusion The small number of participants and restricted participant selection criteria all has considerable impact with regard to generalising these findings to wider HD populations.","PeriodicalId":42629,"journal":{"name":"Renal Society of Australasia Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Society of Australasia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/RSAJ.15.2.53-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim To review the effects of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to measure dry weight (DW) in haemodialysis (HD)patients when compared to clinical examination. Methods The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MasARI). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 software. The search was limited to English language papers published from 2005 to 2017. A standard JBI three-step search strategy was used. We searched all quantitative studies from major databases for investigations of the BIS for measuring DW in HD patients. Results A total of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. These studies all involved patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving HD and the comparison of BIS versus physician’s clinical judgement using cardiovascular parameters and mortality outcomes. The meta-analysis of BIS when compared with clinical judgement found no significant differences in the reduction of the mortality rate, hospitalisation rate or other cardiovascular parameters after 12 months of the intervention; only significant improvement in pre-dialysis systolic BP (WMD –5.41, 95% CI –9.00 to –1.82; p=0.003) was reported. However, individual RCTs found that BIS is an effective intervention for HD patients in the reduction of the mortality rate (HR 0.100, 95% CI, 0.013 to 0.805; p=0.04) after 2.5 years of the intervention. Conclusion The small number of participants and restricted participant selection criteria all has considerable impact with regard to generalising these findings to wider HD populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物阻抗谱对血液透析患者干重(DW)测量的有效性:一项系统综述
目的比较生物阻抗谱(BIS)测量血液透析(HD)患者干重(DW)与临床检查的效果。方法根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所统计荟萃分析评估和审查工具(JBI MasARI)进行审查。使用Review Manager 5软件进行荟萃分析。搜索仅限于2005年至2017年发表的英文论文。使用了标准的JBI三步搜索策略。我们从主要数据库中检索了所有定量研究,以调查BIS测量HD患者DW的情况。结果共有4项随机对照试验符合入选标准。这些研究都涉及接受HD的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者,以及BIS与医生使用心血管参数和死亡率结果进行的临床判断的比较。BIS的荟萃分析与临床判断相比,发现干预12个月后,死亡率、住院率或其他心血管参数的降低没有显著差异;只有透析前收缩压显著改善(WMD-5.41,95%CI-9.00至-1.82;p=0.003)。然而,个体随机对照试验发现,BIS是HD患者在干预2.5年后降低死亡率的有效干预措施(HR 0.100,95%CI,0.013至0.805;p=0.04)。结论参与者数量少和参与者选择标准有限都对将这些发现推广到更广泛的HD人群产生了相当大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
CARI guidelines: Culturally safe and clinical kidney care for First Nations Australians – A summary Bioelectrical impedance analysis for measuring body composition in an outpatient haemodialysis setting: a feasibility study Understanding burnout in the current nephrology nursing workforce and health service ‘magnet’ qualities that may help address it: a discreet choice experiment Prospective randomised crossover trial comparing mixed and post-dilution haemodiafiltration: COMPare HDF study Hepatitis B vaccination in patients with stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease – a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1