Cellobiase Activity as an Indicator of Fungal Decay in the Wood of Woodpecker Nest Cavities in the Pacific Northwest.

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY Northwest Science Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI:10.3955/046.095.0308
J. Kozma, Teresa J. Lorenz, Jerred Seveyka
{"title":"Cellobiase Activity as an Indicator of Fungal Decay in the Wood of Woodpecker Nest Cavities in the Pacific Northwest.","authors":"J. Kozma, Teresa J. Lorenz, Jerred Seveyka","doi":"10.3955/046.095.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Woodpeckers require trees and snags with decayed wood in order to excavate nest and roost cavities, and interior wood hardness is considered an important factor determining where a woodpecker can create a cavity. In most ecosystems, saprophytic fungi are responsible for the decay and softening of wood, and are thought to be important in providing soft wood for woodpecker cavity excavation. We conducted a study of cellulose-degrading enzymes in the wood surrounding woodpecker nest cavities. We measured wood hardness, percent wood density loss (PWDL), and activity of cellobiase (an extracellular fungal cellulase that degrades cellulose) within wood surrounding the nest cavities of the northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), black-backed woodpecker (Picoides arcticus), white-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus), and hairy woodpecker (D. villosus) in Oregon and Washington. We found that mean wood hardness was significantly lower, and cellobiase and PWDL were significantly higher, at nest cavities than controls for each woodpecker species. Wood hardness was higher and cellobiase lower at nests of black-backed woodpecker than northern flicker, but did not differ among the other woodpecker species. Our results suggest that increased amounts of cellobiase result in softer wood due to the increased decay caused by higher fungal enzyme activity and that measuring cellobiase can be used to estimate wood decay without directly measuring wood hardness. All four woodpecker species selected nest substrates with softer wood and higher fungal enzyme activity than controls. This supports findings from previous studies of the importance of saprophytic fungi for woodpecker cavity excavation.","PeriodicalId":49743,"journal":{"name":"Northwest Science","volume":"95 1","pages":"325 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwest Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3955/046.095.0308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Woodpeckers require trees and snags with decayed wood in order to excavate nest and roost cavities, and interior wood hardness is considered an important factor determining where a woodpecker can create a cavity. In most ecosystems, saprophytic fungi are responsible for the decay and softening of wood, and are thought to be important in providing soft wood for woodpecker cavity excavation. We conducted a study of cellulose-degrading enzymes in the wood surrounding woodpecker nest cavities. We measured wood hardness, percent wood density loss (PWDL), and activity of cellobiase (an extracellular fungal cellulase that degrades cellulose) within wood surrounding the nest cavities of the northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), black-backed woodpecker (Picoides arcticus), white-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus), and hairy woodpecker (D. villosus) in Oregon and Washington. We found that mean wood hardness was significantly lower, and cellobiase and PWDL were significantly higher, at nest cavities than controls for each woodpecker species. Wood hardness was higher and cellobiase lower at nests of black-backed woodpecker than northern flicker, but did not differ among the other woodpecker species. Our results suggest that increased amounts of cellobiase result in softer wood due to the increased decay caused by higher fungal enzyme activity and that measuring cellobiase can be used to estimate wood decay without directly measuring wood hardness. All four woodpecker species selected nest substrates with softer wood and higher fungal enzyme activity than controls. This supports findings from previous studies of the importance of saprophytic fungi for woodpecker cavity excavation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维素酶活性作为西北太平洋啄木鸟巢腔木材真菌腐烂的指标。
啄木鸟需要有腐烂木材的树木和树枝来挖掘巢穴和栖息洞,而内部木材的硬度被认为是决定啄木鸟在哪里筑巢的重要因素。在大多数生态系统中,腐生真菌负责木材的腐烂和软化,并且被认为在为啄木鸟挖掘洞穴提供软木材方面很重要。我们对啄木鸟巢穴周围木材中的纤维素降解酶进行了研究。我们测量了俄勒冈州和华盛顿州的北翅翅鸟(Colaptes auratus)、黑背啄木鸟(Picoides arcticus)、白头啄木鸟(Dryobates albolarvatus)和毛啄木鸟(D. villosus)巢穴周围木材中的木材硬度、木材密度损失百分比(PWDL)和纤维素酶(一种降解纤维素的细胞外真菌纤维素酶)的活性。结果表明,各啄木鸟巢腔的平均木材硬度均显著低于对照组,纤维素酶和PWDL均显著高于对照组。黑背啄木鸟巢内木材硬度和纤维素酶含量均高于北颤翅啄木鸟,而其他啄木鸟间差异不显著。我们的研究结果表明,由于较高的真菌酶活性引起的腐烂增加,纤维素酶的量增加导致木材变软,并且测量纤维素酶可以用来估计木材的腐烂而不直接测量木材的硬度。四种啄木鸟均选择较软木材和较高真菌酶活性的筑巢基质。这支持了先前关于腐生真菌对啄木鸟洞穴挖掘的重要性的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Northwest Science
Northwest Science 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The pages of Northwest Science are open to original and fundamental research in the basic, applied, and social sciences. All submissions are refereed by at least two qualified peer reviewers. Papers are welcome from authors outside of the Pacific Northwest if the topic is suitable to our regional audience.
期刊最新文献
Bee Community Differences Among Urban and Rural Sites In Oregon's Willamette Valley Evidence of Bumble Bee Extirpation and Colonization, Galiano Island, British Columbia, Canada Ecological Characteristics of Diurnal Rest Sites Used by Ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) A Decade of Understory Community Dynamics and Stability in a Mature Second-Growth Forest in Western Washington Classification and Assessment of Riparian Ecosystems in Northwest Oregon for Restoration Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1