Elizabeth Johnston, Cheryl L. Burleigh, X. Rasmusson, P. Turner, Drena Valentine, L. Bailey
{"title":"Multimedia Open Educational Resource Materials for Teaching-Online Diversity and Leadership: Aligning Bloom’s Taxonomy and Studio Habits of Mind","authors":"Elizabeth Johnston, Cheryl L. Burleigh, X. Rasmusson, P. Turner, Drena Valentine, L. Bailey","doi":"10.18870/hlrc.v11i2.1234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore, develop, test, and refine processes to incorporate meaningful and equitable use of open educational resources (OER) in online classrooms. Method: The intent of this qualitative study was to use an action research process of interactive discussions between higher education practitioners to shape collective understanding of how to teach in an online learning environment using OER. Results: The study resulted in the identification six exemplar learning opportunities which could be incorporated into the blended pedagogical model. Each exemplar OER included all four types of knowledge as defined by Bloom's taxonomy and required skills of observe and envision as defined in the Studio Habits of Mind (SHoM). A second criteria for our purposive selection was that each exemplar could be used to teach in multiple contexts for multiple purposes across a spectrum of higher education online courses. Conclusion: This study reminds us that educators need a new mindset to work with multimedia and visual resources. The blended pedagogical model provides scaffold teaching and learning opportunities that were not visible in either Bloom's taxonomy or SHoM alone. This blended pedagogical model scaffolds the “how” when using a visual approach to curriculum development that may enrich the learning experiences of students when presented in online higher education classrooms. Implication for Practice: Educators might replicate this study or transfer findings for purposes of comparing and testing further the use of OER in their online higher education classes to further engage student learning. Applying new understanding in a project that is shared with the larger learning group is essential as students understand and begin to own new skills and insights. The blended pedagogical model presented in this paper could be helpful to educators to maximize the benefits from the integration of technology and OERs to support online higher education.","PeriodicalId":37033,"journal":{"name":"Higher Learning Research Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Learning Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i2.1234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore, develop, test, and refine processes to incorporate meaningful and equitable use of open educational resources (OER) in online classrooms. Method: The intent of this qualitative study was to use an action research process of interactive discussions between higher education practitioners to shape collective understanding of how to teach in an online learning environment using OER. Results: The study resulted in the identification six exemplar learning opportunities which could be incorporated into the blended pedagogical model. Each exemplar OER included all four types of knowledge as defined by Bloom's taxonomy and required skills of observe and envision as defined in the Studio Habits of Mind (SHoM). A second criteria for our purposive selection was that each exemplar could be used to teach in multiple contexts for multiple purposes across a spectrum of higher education online courses. Conclusion: This study reminds us that educators need a new mindset to work with multimedia and visual resources. The blended pedagogical model provides scaffold teaching and learning opportunities that were not visible in either Bloom's taxonomy or SHoM alone. This blended pedagogical model scaffolds the “how” when using a visual approach to curriculum development that may enrich the learning experiences of students when presented in online higher education classrooms. Implication for Practice: Educators might replicate this study or transfer findings for purposes of comparing and testing further the use of OER in their online higher education classes to further engage student learning. Applying new understanding in a project that is shared with the larger learning group is essential as students understand and begin to own new skills and insights. The blended pedagogical model presented in this paper could be helpful to educators to maximize the benefits from the integration of technology and OERs to support online higher education.
目的:本研究的目的是探索、开发、测试和完善在线课堂中有意义和公平使用开放教育资源(OER)的过程。方法:本定性研究的目的是利用高等教育从业者之间互动讨论的行动研究过程,形成对如何使用OER在在线学习环境中教学的集体理解。结果:本研究确定了六个可以纳入混合教学模式的学习机会范例。每个示例OER包括Bloom分类法定义的所有四种类型的知识,以及Studio Habits of Mind(SHoM)中定义的观察和想象所需的技能。我们有目的地选择的第二个标准是,每个样本都可以在多种背景下用于高等教育在线课程的多种目的。结论:这项研究提醒我们,教育工作者需要一种新的心态来处理多媒体和视觉资源。混合教学模式提供了支架式教学和学习机会,这些机会在Bloom的分类学或SHoM中都不可见。这种混合教学模式在使用视觉方法进行课程开发时提供了“如何”的框架,这可能会丰富学生在在线高等教育课堂上的学习体验。实践意义:教育工作者可能会复制这项研究或转移研究结果,以进一步比较和测试在线高等教育课程中OER的使用情况,从而进一步参与学生的学习。在与更大的学习小组共享的项目中应用新的理解是至关重要的,因为学生理解并开始拥有新的技能和见解。本文提出的混合教学模式有助于教育工作者最大限度地利用技术和OER的整合来支持在线高等教育。