Wagner’s Law: A Revision and a New Empirical Estimation

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.1.1
Manuel Jaén-García
{"title":"Wagner’s Law: A Revision and a New Empirical Estimation","authors":"Manuel Jaén-García","doi":"10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conducts an analysis of the various theoretical and practical problems related to Wagner’s Law on the growth in public spending. As a contribution, and with the intention of offering a new perspective in considering this principle, this paper puts Wagner´s Law to the test for the first time using public employment as a measure of public spending, which is in line with recommendations by Peacock and Scott (2000). In the empirical contrast we use unit root techniques and cointegration with structural breakpoints. The result obtained leads us to reject the law for Spain based on the belief that there are variables other than that GDP which influence public spending growth.","PeriodicalId":48669,"journal":{"name":"Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics","volume":"224 1","pages":"13-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.1.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study conducts an analysis of the various theoretical and practical problems related to Wagner’s Law on the growth in public spending. As a contribution, and with the intention of offering a new perspective in considering this principle, this paper puts Wagner´s Law to the test for the first time using public employment as a measure of public spending, which is in line with recommendations by Peacock and Scott (2000). In the empirical contrast we use unit root techniques and cointegration with structural breakpoints. The result obtained leads us to reject the law for Spain based on the belief that there are variables other than that GDP which influence public spending growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瓦格纳定律:一个修正和一个新的经验估计
本研究分析了与瓦格纳公共支出增长定律相关的各种理论和实践问题。作为一项贡献,为了在考虑这一原则时提供一个新的视角,本文首次将公共就业作为公共支出的衡量标准,对瓦格纳定律进行了检验,这符合Peacock和Scott(2000)的建议。在经验对比中,我们使用了单位根技术和具有结构断点的协整。所获得的结果导致我们拒绝接受西班牙的法律,因为我们相信除了GDP之外还有其他变量会影响公共支出增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics
Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics welcomes submissions on all areas of public economics. We seek to publish original and innovative research, applied and theoretical, related to the economic analysis of Government intervention. For example, but not exclusively: Taxation, Redistribution, Health, Education, Pensions, Governance, Fiscal Policy and Fiscal Federalism. In addition to regular submissions, the journal welcomes submissions of: -Survey Reviews, containing surveys of the literature regarding issues of interest in the Public Economics field; -Policy oriented reviews, showing the current contributions of Public Economics in relation to relevant contemporary issues affecting public decision-makers in the real world (Policy Watch); -Comments of previously published articles. Contributions to this section should be limited to a maximum of 2 000 words (12 pages). If deemed adequate, the authors of the commented article will be given the opportunity to react in a Reply. Both Comment and Reply will be published together. Articles for the Survey Reviews and Policy Watch section are subject to the same double blind reviwing procedure. The adequacy of Comments submitted for publication will be evaluated by the Executive Editors.
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between Public Expenditure and Private Investment in Developed and Developing Economies: Policy Implications Based on the Difference The Case for Uniform Commodity Taxation: A Tax Reform Approach Real Estate in a Post-Pandemic World: How Can Policies Make Housing More Enviromentally Sustainable and Affordable? Centrality and Capital Costs in Urban Areas: Policy Watch for Spain Did the Euro Really Increase Corruption in the Eurozone? A Counterfactual Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1