Análise de redes sociais no campo da psicologia do trabalho: reflexões metodológicas

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia Conocimiento y Sociedad Pub Date : 2021-08-10 DOI:10.26864/pcs.v11.n2.7
Renata Guimarães de Carvalho, Natalia lopes Braga, R. Maciel, Tereza Glaucia Rocha, José Wilton Lima Martins
{"title":"Análise de redes sociais no campo da psicologia do trabalho: reflexões metodológicas","authors":"Renata Guimarães de Carvalho, Natalia lopes Braga, R. Maciel, Tereza Glaucia Rocha, José Wilton Lima Martins","doi":"10.26864/pcs.v11.n2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depression represents one of the most frequent and disabling mood disorders in the elderly population. To measure it, one of the most used scales is the Geriatric Depression Questionnaire, developed by Yesavage, in its abbreviated version (GDS-VE). Despite its ample acknowledgment and frequent use, an analysis of these characteristics has not yet been carried out on the Argentine population. Currently, because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the isolation context, the American Psychological Association recommends adapting face-to-face to virtual practices. Given this need, the present work aims to analyze the internal structure of the GDS-VE, for pencilpaper and Internet modalities examining the metric equivalence between both of them. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out and the internal consistency was estimated for both modalities. Factor invariance between both forms of administration was also examined. A total of 696 older adults participated and responded to the questionnaire, using two modes of administration (50% pencil-paper and 50% Internet). As a result, an adequate adjustment of the model to the empirical data was verified for both versions (pencil-paper and Internet), as well as an adequate metric invariance between them. These findings provide evidence of validity and reliability of the GDS-VE instrument on the Argentine population.","PeriodicalId":41814,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia Conocimiento y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia Conocimiento y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26864/pcs.v11.n2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression represents one of the most frequent and disabling mood disorders in the elderly population. To measure it, one of the most used scales is the Geriatric Depression Questionnaire, developed by Yesavage, in its abbreviated version (GDS-VE). Despite its ample acknowledgment and frequent use, an analysis of these characteristics has not yet been carried out on the Argentine population. Currently, because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the isolation context, the American Psychological Association recommends adapting face-to-face to virtual practices. Given this need, the present work aims to analyze the internal structure of the GDS-VE, for pencilpaper and Internet modalities examining the metric equivalence between both of them. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out and the internal consistency was estimated for both modalities. Factor invariance between both forms of administration was also examined. A total of 696 older adults participated and responded to the questionnaire, using two modes of administration (50% pencil-paper and 50% Internet). As a result, an adequate adjustment of the model to the empirical data was verified for both versions (pencil-paper and Internet), as well as an adequate metric invariance between them. These findings provide evidence of validity and reliability of the GDS-VE instrument on the Argentine population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作心理学领域的社会网络分析:方法论反思
抑郁症是老年人中最常见、最致残的情绪障碍之一。为了测量它,最常用的量表之一是Yesavage开发的老年抑郁症问卷,其缩写版本(GDS-VE)。尽管它得到了充分的认可和频繁的使用,但尚未对阿根廷人口的这些特征进行分析。目前,由于新冠肺炎大流行和隔离环境,美国心理协会建议采用面对面的虚拟实践。鉴于这一需求,本工作旨在分析GDS-VE的内部结构,用于铅笔纸和互联网模式,检查两者之间的度量等效性。进行了验证性因素分析,并估计了两种模式的内部一致性。还检查了两种给药形式之间的因子不变性。共有696名老年人参与并回答了问卷,使用了两种管理模式(50%的铅笔纸和50%的互联网)。因此,对于两个版本(铅笔纸和互联网),验证了模型对经验数据的适当调整,以及它们之间的适当度量不变性。这些发现为GDS-VE工具在阿根廷人群中的有效性和可靠性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia Conocimiento y Sociedad
Psicologia Conocimiento y Sociedad PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Escala de competências socioemocionais para estudantes universitários: Produção de normas e sua relação com bem-estar subjetivo Velhice LGBTI e Comunidade Rural Litorânea: um estudo das representações sociais entre uma população majoritariamente católica Sentidos y vivencias relacionados con el uso recreativo de MDMA (Éxtasis) Editorial. Volumen 13, Número 1 Estilos parentais como fator de proteção ou risco ao consumo de álcool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1