{"title":"Paradigm Shift in the Work of Arnold de Beer and Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies (1980–2020)","authors":"K. Tomaselli","doi":"10.1080/23743670.2021.1915353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the early work of Arnold S. de Beer, a founding scholar of journalism studies in South Africa. Drawing on culturalism and autoethnography, a revisionist analysis examines the maturing perspectives of the author over 45 years of interaction with de Beer. The conceptual opposites negotiated include communication science versus media studies, positivism versus cultural studies, and objectivity versus subjectivity. The narrative focuses on how de Beer with Ecquid Novi (EN), and through his publications, shaped journalistic debates in South Africa from 1980 onwards. The junction where the paths of the two scholars converged is framed within a medieval jousting metaphor. This article continues and reassesses an overview written in similar vein in 2004 by the present author on the occasion of EN’s then 25th anniversary.","PeriodicalId":54049,"journal":{"name":"African Journalism Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"24 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23743670.2021.1915353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1915353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article examines the early work of Arnold S. de Beer, a founding scholar of journalism studies in South Africa. Drawing on culturalism and autoethnography, a revisionist analysis examines the maturing perspectives of the author over 45 years of interaction with de Beer. The conceptual opposites negotiated include communication science versus media studies, positivism versus cultural studies, and objectivity versus subjectivity. The narrative focuses on how de Beer with Ecquid Novi (EN), and through his publications, shaped journalistic debates in South Africa from 1980 onwards. The junction where the paths of the two scholars converged is framed within a medieval jousting metaphor. This article continues and reassesses an overview written in similar vein in 2004 by the present author on the occasion of EN’s then 25th anniversary.
本文考察了南非新闻研究奠基人阿诺德·s·德比尔的早期作品。借鉴文化主义和自我民族志,修正主义的分析考察了作者在与德比尔45年的互动中成熟的观点。讨论的概念对立包括传播科学与媒介研究、实证主义与文化研究、客观性与主观性。本书的叙述重点是de Beer和Ecquid Novi (EN)以及他的出版物如何塑造了1980年以来南非的新闻辩论。这两位学者的道路交汇的地方是一个中世纪比武的比喻。本文将继续并重新评估现任作者在2004年EN成立25周年之际以类似的风格撰写的概述。
期刊介绍:
Accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for university research purposes African Journalism Studies subscribes to the Code of Best Practice for Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals of the Academy of Science of South Africa. African Journalism Studies ( AJS) aims to contribute to the ongoing extension of the theories, methodologies and empirical data to under-researched areas of knowledge production, through its emphasis on African journalism studies within a broader, comparative perspective of the Global South. AJS strives for theoretical diversity and methodological inclusivity, by developing theoretical approaches and making critical interventions in global scholarly debates. The journal''s comparative and interdisciplinary approach is informed by the related fields of cultural and media studies, communication studies, African studies, politics, and sociology. The field of journalism studies is understood broadly, as including the practices, norms, value systems, frameworks of representation, audiences, platforms, industries, theories and power relations that relate to the production, consumption and study of journalism. A wide definition of journalism is used, which extends beyond news and current affairs to include digital and social media, documentary film and narrative non-fiction.