The Legal Implications of Public Support Policies Targeting Research, Development and Innovation in the European Union

P. Dutt, Katrin Nyman-Metcalf
{"title":"The Legal Implications of Public Support Policies Targeting Research, Development and Innovation in the European Union","authors":"P. Dutt, Katrin Nyman-Metcalf","doi":"10.2478/bjes-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The research problem of this article focuses on how the public support system in Estonia can help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to acquire and commercialise their intellectual property rights (IPR) in a sustainable and legally permissible manner. The study aims to analyse and determine which specific public support measures are needed by SMEs for acquiring and commercialising IPR and how to design such public support within the legal boundaries set under European Union (EU) laws. The theoretical framework used in this study is built around the social system as defined by Parsons. The 4S Model (based on scope, scale, skill and social networking) derived by researchers from the said social system is considered. Further, 19 key attributes were devised by the authors in conjunction with the role of motivation to form a revised framework. The analysis employs qualitative research methods. To apply the framework of social systems theory, the authors used semi-structured interviews as a method to study the public support measures required by Estonian stakeholders. This was also analysed in the framework of EU State aid law, which poses both restrictions and exemptions. This research presents several desired support measures. Although the public support systems for acquiring and commercialising IPR by SMEs are restrained by legal frameworks within the EU, the analysis of the relevant laws and cases shows that State aid for RDI purposes is legally permissible within the EU, depending on the state’s willingness and availability of funds.","PeriodicalId":29836,"journal":{"name":"TalTech Journal of European Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"102 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TalTech Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The research problem of this article focuses on how the public support system in Estonia can help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to acquire and commercialise their intellectual property rights (IPR) in a sustainable and legally permissible manner. The study aims to analyse and determine which specific public support measures are needed by SMEs for acquiring and commercialising IPR and how to design such public support within the legal boundaries set under European Union (EU) laws. The theoretical framework used in this study is built around the social system as defined by Parsons. The 4S Model (based on scope, scale, skill and social networking) derived by researchers from the said social system is considered. Further, 19 key attributes were devised by the authors in conjunction with the role of motivation to form a revised framework. The analysis employs qualitative research methods. To apply the framework of social systems theory, the authors used semi-structured interviews as a method to study the public support measures required by Estonian stakeholders. This was also analysed in the framework of EU State aid law, which poses both restrictions and exemptions. This research presents several desired support measures. Although the public support systems for acquiring and commercialising IPR by SMEs are restrained by legal frameworks within the EU, the analysis of the relevant laws and cases shows that State aid for RDI purposes is legally permissible within the EU, depending on the state’s willingness and availability of funds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟针对研究、发展和创新的公共支持政策的法律意义
摘要本文的研究问题集中在爱沙尼亚的公共支持系统如何帮助中小企业以可持续和法律允许的方式获得其知识产权并将其商业化。该研究旨在分析和确定中小企业收购知识产权并将其商业化需要哪些具体的公共支持措施,以及如何在欧盟法律规定的法律范围内设计此类公共支持。本研究中使用的理论框架是围绕帕森斯定义的社会体系构建的。研究人员从上述社会系统中得出的4S模型(基于范围、规模、技能和社交网络)被考虑在内。此外,作者结合动机的作用设计了19个关键属性,以形成一个修订的框架。分析采用定性研究方法。为了应用社会系统理论的框架,作者使用半结构化访谈作为一种方法来研究爱沙尼亚利益相关者所需的公共支持措施。这也在欧盟国家援助法的框架内进行了分析,该法既有限制也有豁免。这项研究提出了一些想要的支持措施。尽管中小企业获取知识产权并将其商业化的公共支持系统受到欧盟内部法律框架的限制,但对相关法律和案例的分析表明,根据国家的意愿和资金可用性,在欧盟内部,用于RDI目的的国家援助在法律上是允许的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
62.50%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Threats to Diversity of Opinion and Freedom of Expression via Social Media Selected Legal Issues in Online Adult Education: Compliance of Online Learning and Teaching Process with GDPR Evolution of the European Union Development Policy towards India Divorce at the Notary: Protection of Creditors’ Interests Evolution of the Digital Economy and Society Index in the European Union: Α Socioeconomic Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1