Delay in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis among patients in the Suez Canal Area

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Egyptian Journal of Bronchology Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.4103/ejb.ejb_8_19
N. M. A. Elsaid, A. Refaat, Lamiaa A. Fiala, Eman R. Hamed
{"title":"Delay in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis among patients in the Suez Canal Area","authors":"N. M. A. Elsaid, A. Refaat, Lamiaa A. Fiala, Eman R. Hamed","doi":"10.4103/ejb.ejb_8_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) can enhance the transmission of infection and worsen prognosis. Aim To identify the risk factors of delay in the management of TB cases for early management. Patients and methods A cross-sectional analytic study was performed to assess the proportion, duration of delay, and its determinants in the diagnosis and management of TB. To assess the risk factors of delay, the sample was dichotomized into ‘delay’ and ‘nondelay’ groups taking the median total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB as a cutoff point. The study included 183 TB patients, who were registered in TB records during the study period (first of January to end of June, 2017). Data were collected by an interview questionnaire. Results Nearly half of patients (49.20%) had unacceptable total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB. The median of total delay, patient delay, and health-care system delay were 65, 14, and 20 days, respectively. Significant risk factors of total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB were not consulting the health-care provider after onset of symptoms (P=0.002), visiting initially the health facility other than the chest hospital/TB clinics (P=0.019), not consulting a chest physician initially (P=0.043), negative sputum smear (P=0.001), more than two health visits before initial diagnosis (P<0.001), while low-degree TB stigma was protective (P=0.006). Conclusion Nearly half of patients had unacceptable total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB. The main determinants were seeking pharmacies instead of visiting health-care providers, not visiting initially chest hospital/TB clinics, not consulting a chest physician initially, negative sputum smear, and more than two health visits before initial diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":34128,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_8_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) can enhance the transmission of infection and worsen prognosis. Aim To identify the risk factors of delay in the management of TB cases for early management. Patients and methods A cross-sectional analytic study was performed to assess the proportion, duration of delay, and its determinants in the diagnosis and management of TB. To assess the risk factors of delay, the sample was dichotomized into ‘delay’ and ‘nondelay’ groups taking the median total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB as a cutoff point. The study included 183 TB patients, who were registered in TB records during the study period (first of January to end of June, 2017). Data were collected by an interview questionnaire. Results Nearly half of patients (49.20%) had unacceptable total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB. The median of total delay, patient delay, and health-care system delay were 65, 14, and 20 days, respectively. Significant risk factors of total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB were not consulting the health-care provider after onset of symptoms (P=0.002), visiting initially the health facility other than the chest hospital/TB clinics (P=0.019), not consulting a chest physician initially (P=0.043), negative sputum smear (P=0.001), more than two health visits before initial diagnosis (P<0.001), while low-degree TB stigma was protective (P=0.006). Conclusion Nearly half of patients had unacceptable total delay in the diagnosis and management of TB. The main determinants were seeking pharmacies instead of visiting health-care providers, not visiting initially chest hospital/TB clinics, not consulting a chest physician initially, negative sputum smear, and more than two health visits before initial diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏伊士运河地区结核病患者诊断和治疗的延误
背景结核(TB)的延迟诊断可增加感染的传播并恶化预后。目的探讨结核病患者延误治疗的危险因素,为早期治疗提供依据。患者和方法进行了一项横断面分析研究,以评估结核病诊断和管理中延迟的比例、持续时间及其决定因素。为了评估延迟的危险因素,将样本分为“延迟”组和“非延迟”组,以结核病诊断和管理的总延迟中位数作为截止点。该研究包括183名结核病患者,他们在研究期间(2017年1月1日至6月底)在结核病记录中登记。数据通过访谈问卷收集。结果近一半(49.20%)的患者在结核病的诊断和治疗中存在不可接受的总延误。总延迟、患者延迟和卫生保健系统延迟的中位数分别为65、14和20天。导致结核病诊断和管理全面延误的重要风险因素有:出现症状后未咨询卫生保健提供者(P=0.002)、最初访问胸科医院/结核病诊所以外的卫生机构(P=0.019)、最初未咨询胸科医生(P=0.043)、痰涂片阴性(P=0.001)、在最初诊断前进行两次以上的卫生检查(P<0.001),而结核病低程度的耻耻感具有保护作用(P=0.006)。结论近一半的患者在结核病的诊断和治疗上存在不可接受的总延误。主要决定因素是寻找药店而不是去卫生保健提供者,最初没有去胸科医院/结核病诊所,最初没有咨询胸科医生,痰涂片阴性,以及在初步诊断前进行两次以上的健康检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of atypical pneumonia by chest ultrasonography Safety and efficacy of high flow nasal canula in patients with mild hypercapnia Impact of comorbid pulmonary disease on COVID-19 disease severity and outcome: a retrospective cohort study Imaging changes of oil aspiration over time in children: a case series Diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy versus either technique alone in peripheral lung and pleural lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1