Birth Mothers’ Experiences of Privacy Turbulence in Relation to Closed Adoption Information

IF 2.2 Q2 COMMUNICATION JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION Pub Date : 2020-05-02 DOI:10.1080/15267431.2020.1761807
Melissa Rizzo Weller, Angela M. Hosek
{"title":"Birth Mothers’ Experiences of Privacy Turbulence in Relation to Closed Adoption Information","authors":"Melissa Rizzo Weller, Angela M. Hosek","doi":"10.1080/15267431.2020.1761807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Adoption information, including original birth certificates (OBCs) and (non)identifying information, is kept secret from birth mothers who place their children in closed adoptions. Through the lens of communication privacy management theory (CPM), the present student explores how birth mothers who participated in closed adoptions experienced turbulence related to wanting to still be included in the privacy boundary of their children in a range of ways that were inconsistent with the legal parameters of a closed adoption. Participants (n = 31) responded to an online questionnaire asking about privacy issues and expectations related to their adoption information, specifically their experiences of turbulence. Emergent themes included inaccurate notions about perceived shared co-ownership rights, regret about the limited primary control of adoption information, and a desire for turbulence, allowing further expansion of co-ownership and control. Results of this study show how birth mothers who have engaged in closed adoptions may come to regret signing over control of their children (and consequently all privacy management decisions) to adoption agencies. These women appreciate the cultural and legal shifts that have created turbulence, opening up adoption records in some states, enabling them to potentially co-own more information about their children. Implications of these findings demonstrate birth mothers’ privacy rules evolve over time.","PeriodicalId":46648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","volume":"20 1","pages":"250 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15267431.2020.1761807","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1761807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Adoption information, including original birth certificates (OBCs) and (non)identifying information, is kept secret from birth mothers who place their children in closed adoptions. Through the lens of communication privacy management theory (CPM), the present student explores how birth mothers who participated in closed adoptions experienced turbulence related to wanting to still be included in the privacy boundary of their children in a range of ways that were inconsistent with the legal parameters of a closed adoption. Participants (n = 31) responded to an online questionnaire asking about privacy issues and expectations related to their adoption information, specifically their experiences of turbulence. Emergent themes included inaccurate notions about perceived shared co-ownership rights, regret about the limited primary control of adoption information, and a desire for turbulence, allowing further expansion of co-ownership and control. Results of this study show how birth mothers who have engaged in closed adoptions may come to regret signing over control of their children (and consequently all privacy management decisions) to adoption agencies. These women appreciate the cultural and legal shifts that have created turbulence, opening up adoption records in some states, enabling them to potentially co-own more information about their children. Implications of these findings demonstrate birth mothers’ privacy rules evolve over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生母对封闭式收养信息的隐私动荡体验
摘要收养信息,包括原始出生证明(OBC)和(非)身份信息,对将孩子封闭收养的生母保密。通过沟通隐私管理理论(CPM)的视角,本学生探讨了参与封闭式收养的生母是如何经历动荡的,这些动荡与希望仍然以一系列不符合封闭式收养法律参数的方式被纳入孩子的隐私边界有关。参与者(n=31)回答了一份在线问卷,询问与收养信息相关的隐私问题和期望,特别是他们的动荡经历。新出现的主题包括对感知的共同所有权的不准确概念,对收养信息的主要控制有限的遗憾,以及对动荡的渴望,从而允许共同所有权和控制权的进一步扩大。这项研究的结果表明,参与封闭收养的生母可能会后悔将对孩子的控制权(以及所有隐私管理决定)移交给收养机构。这些女性欣赏造成动荡的文化和法律转变,在一些州打开了收养记录,使她们有可能共同拥有更多关于孩子的信息。这些发现表明,生母的隐私规则会随着时间的推移而演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Charting a Research Agenda for Relational Dialectics Theory: Forwarding Critical Theorizing in Interpersonal and Family Communication Research Facilitation and Interference from Partners During the Transition to Parenthood: A Co-Occurrence Analysis of Themes Emerging Over Time within and Between Romantic Partners Editor Introduction Applying Relational Turbulence Theory to Parent-Child Political Conversations: The Role of (Dis)agreement About Christian Nationalism “We’ve Had to Relearn All of Our Family Dynamics”: Communicated Narrative Sense-Making of Bereavement Following Terminal Illness in U.S. Families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1