It’s much more important than that: against fictionalist accounts of fandom

IF 1.2 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Journal of the Philosophy of Sport Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00948705.2022.2032110
Alfred Archer, Jake Wojtowicz
{"title":"It’s much more important than that: against fictionalist accounts of fandom","authors":"Alfred Archer, Jake Wojtowicz","doi":"10.1080/00948705.2022.2032110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Do sports fans really care about their team winning? According to several philosophers, the answer is no. Sports fans engage in fictional caring during the match, which involves a game of make-believe that the result is important. We will argue that this account does not provide a full account of the way in which fans relate to the teams they support. For many fans, the team they support forms a core part of their identity. The success or failure of their team impacts the community they are a part of and around which they build a central part of their identity. For these fans, it really does matter whether their team wins or loses. We will finish by articulating a more limited role that fictional caring may play in sports fandom.","PeriodicalId":46532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of Sport","volume":"49 1","pages":"83 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Philosophy of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2022.2032110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Do sports fans really care about their team winning? According to several philosophers, the answer is no. Sports fans engage in fictional caring during the match, which involves a game of make-believe that the result is important. We will argue that this account does not provide a full account of the way in which fans relate to the teams they support. For many fans, the team they support forms a core part of their identity. The success or failure of their team impacts the community they are a part of and around which they build a central part of their identity. For these fans, it really does matter whether their team wins or loses. We will finish by articulating a more limited role that fictional caring may play in sports fandom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这比这重要得多:反对虚构的粉丝描述
摘要体育迷们真的关心他们的球队获胜吗?根据几位哲学家的说法,答案是否定的。体育迷在比赛中进行虚构的关心,这涉及到一场假装结果很重要的比赛。我们会争辩说,这个账户并没有提供球迷与他们支持的球队之间关系的完整账户。对于许多球迷来说,他们所支持的球队构成了他们身份的核心部分。他们团队的成功或失败会影响他们所属的社区,并围绕这个社区构建他们身份的核心部分。对于这些球迷来说,他们的球队输赢真的很重要。最后,我们将阐明虚构的关爱在体育迷中可能发挥的更为有限的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Philosophy of Sport (JPS) is the most respected medium for communicating contemporary philosophic thought with regard to sport. It contains stimulating articles, critical reviews of work completed, and philosophic discussions about the philosophy of sport. JPS is published twice a year for the International Association for the Philosophy of Sport; members receive it as part of their membership. To subscribe to either the print or e-version of JPS, press the Subscribe or Renew button at the top of this screen.
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous movement: an exploration of the concept Strength as phenomenon: a pure phenomenology of sport Wonder and the sublime in surfing and nature sports Cowboy professionalism: a cultural study of big-mountain tourism in the last frontier Why do birds have wings? A biosemiotic argument for the primacy of naturogenic sporting sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1