Performance Implications of Diversification Strategies During Institutional Transformations: An Emerging Market Study

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1172
S. Srinivasan, M. Thenmozhi, P. Vijayaraghavan
{"title":"Performance Implications of Diversification Strategies During Institutional Transformations: An Emerging Market Study","authors":"S. Srinivasan, M. Thenmozhi, P. Vijayaraghavan","doi":"10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive model that examines the impact of corporate diversification, and its interaction effects with ownership structure, industry structure and firm size, in explaining firm performance for three distinct phases of institutional development in an Indian context. The conceptual model developed through review of literature is tested using a large sample of publicly traded companies in India, using GLM Univatiate model, for Post-liberalization, Transition and Pre-liberalization phases that span a period of fifteen years. Our findings show that diversification firm performance relationship varies as institutions develop. Although unrelated diversifiers achieved superior performance during the pre-liberalization phase, focused players performed better during the transition phase. Post-liberalization, diversification did not impact firm performance; superior firm performance was driven by the ability of firms to scale, be present in profitable industries and productively use their assets. Significant interaction effects were observed between diversification and, industry structure, ownership type and firm size, in explaining firm performance. Firms affiliated to large business groups continue to be highly diversified and under performed as institutions developed.","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive model that examines the impact of corporate diversification, and its interaction effects with ownership structure, industry structure and firm size, in explaining firm performance for three distinct phases of institutional development in an Indian context. The conceptual model developed through review of literature is tested using a large sample of publicly traded companies in India, using GLM Univatiate model, for Post-liberalization, Transition and Pre-liberalization phases that span a period of fifteen years. Our findings show that diversification firm performance relationship varies as institutions develop. Although unrelated diversifiers achieved superior performance during the pre-liberalization phase, focused players performed better during the transition phase. Post-liberalization, diversification did not impact firm performance; superior firm performance was driven by the ability of firms to scale, be present in profitable industries and productively use their assets. Significant interaction effects were observed between diversification and, industry structure, ownership type and firm size, in explaining firm performance. Firms affiliated to large business groups continue to be highly diversified and under performed as institutions developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度转型中多元化策略对绩效的影响:一项新兴市场研究
本研究的目的是建立一个综合模型,检验公司多元化的影响,以及它与所有权结构、行业结构和公司规模的相互作用,以解释印度背景下制度发展的三个不同阶段的公司绩效。通过文献回顾开发的概念模型使用印度上市公司的大样本进行了测试,使用GLM univerate模型,用于跨越15年的自由化后,转型和自由化前阶段。我们的研究结果表明,多元化与公司绩效的关系随着制度的发展而变化。虽然不相关的多元化参与者在自由化前阶段取得了更好的表现,但专注的参与者在转型阶段表现更好。自由化后,多元化对企业绩效没有影响;卓越的企业绩效是由企业规模、出现在盈利行业和有效利用其资产的能力所驱动的。多元化与产业结构、所有制类型和企业规模在解释企业绩效方面存在显著的交互效应。随着机构的发展,隶属于大型企业集团的公司继续高度多元化,表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Intention of Empowering Excellence on the Path to Professional Qualification in Sustainable Development and Governance Is Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Value Enhancing? Evidence from Top 100 Companies Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia Islamic Work Ethics, Good Corporate Governance Practices and Fraudulent Financial Statements Council’s Online Disclosure of Accountability Practices: Isomorphism Inquiries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1