From ‘Struggle’ to ‘Debate’: A Conventional Look at the Source of Debate in Turkish Literature

Erhan Çapraz
{"title":"From ‘Struggle’ to ‘Debate’: A Conventional Look at the Source of Debate in Turkish Literature","authors":"Erhan Çapraz","doi":"10.26650/TUDED412765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate is a style that has been used extensively both in eastern and western literature. Hence, there are many, very different considerations about the source of this style. Westerners accept that the debate has reached them from ancient pre-Asian civilizations through Greek and Latin literatures. Notably, Fuad Köprülü, researchers such as Meserret Diriöz and Orhan Şaik Gökyay claimed that the debate style first took shape in oral literature traditions of the Turks, and was passed onto Arab and Persian literature. It has recently come up with a distinctive structure and a rich variety of subjects. However, in Turkish, Iranian, Arabic, and western literatures, the debate style closely-shares similarities and common features between the structure, performance, and performance context. Based on these similarities and common features, we examine the source of the debate in Turkish literature from a conventional point of view. Likewise, the struggle for superiority, namely the wars, which constitutes the most important part of the Turks social life, forms the basis of the debate style. On the one hand, the “right arm” and the “left arm” structure of the Turks has become effective in the development of the debate style and on the other hand, provided this style to survive till date. Therefore, the “wars” have a direct effect on the embodiment of the debate in the Turks. In this context, the study has suggested that the ability and understanding of the Turks toward wars constitute a source for debate style.","PeriodicalId":29693,"journal":{"name":"Turk Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi-Journal of Turkish Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi-Journal of Turkish Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED412765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate is a style that has been used extensively both in eastern and western literature. Hence, there are many, very different considerations about the source of this style. Westerners accept that the debate has reached them from ancient pre-Asian civilizations through Greek and Latin literatures. Notably, Fuad Köprülü, researchers such as Meserret Diriöz and Orhan Şaik Gökyay claimed that the debate style first took shape in oral literature traditions of the Turks, and was passed onto Arab and Persian literature. It has recently come up with a distinctive structure and a rich variety of subjects. However, in Turkish, Iranian, Arabic, and western literatures, the debate style closely-shares similarities and common features between the structure, performance, and performance context. Based on these similarities and common features, we examine the source of the debate in Turkish literature from a conventional point of view. Likewise, the struggle for superiority, namely the wars, which constitutes the most important part of the Turks social life, forms the basis of the debate style. On the one hand, the “right arm” and the “left arm” structure of the Turks has become effective in the development of the debate style and on the other hand, provided this style to survive till date. Therefore, the “wars” have a direct effect on the embodiment of the debate in the Turks. In this context, the study has suggested that the ability and understanding of the Turks toward wars constitute a source for debate style.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“斗争”到“辩论”:从传统角度看土耳其文学中的辩论来源
辩论是东西方文学中广泛使用的一种文体。因此,关于这种风格的来源有许多非常不同的考虑。西方人认为,这场辩论是通过希腊和拉丁文学从古代前亚洲文明传到他们这里的。值得注意的是,Fuad Köprülü, Meserret Diriöz和Orhan Şaik Gökyay等研究人员声称辩论风格首先在土耳其人的口头文学传统中形成,然后传播到阿拉伯和波斯文学中。它最近提出了一个独特的结构和丰富多样的主题。然而,在土耳其、伊朗、阿拉伯和西方文献中,辩论风格在结构、表演和表演语境之间有着密切的相似之处和共同特征。基于这些相似之处和共同特征,我们从传统的角度审视土耳其文学辩论的来源。同样,争夺优势的斗争,即战争,构成了土耳其人社会生活中最重要的部分,形成了辩论风格的基础。一方面,土耳其人的“右臂”和“左臂”结构在辩论风格的发展中发挥了作用,另一方面,这种风格得以延续至今。因此,“战争”直接影响了辩论在土耳其人身上的体现。在此背景下,该研究表明,土耳其人对战争的能力和理解构成了辩论风格的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dünyanın Nizamı: Ömer Seyfettin’in Son Dönem Öykülerinde Egemenlik Fikri Klasik Türk Şiirinde Estetik ve Poetikanın Kaynağı Olarak Hadis Budist ve İslamî-Türkçe Metinlerde ‘Alay (Etmek)’ Miftâhu’l-Ulûm Etrafında Gelişen Temel Belâgat Eserlerinin Klasik Türk Şiirinde Ele Alınışları Üzerine https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/journal/tuded/article/divan-siirinde-gecen-musiki-istilahlarina-dair-genel-bir-tasnif-denemesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1