Methods used to capture subjective user experiences in adults while riding bicycles: a scoping review

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2022.2123064
Anjani Kalra , Tommy Lim , Lauren Pearson , Ben Beck
{"title":"Methods used to capture subjective user experiences in adults while riding bicycles: a scoping review","authors":"Anjani Kalra ,&nbsp;Tommy Lim ,&nbsp;Lauren Pearson ,&nbsp;Ben Beck","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2022.2123064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People who ride bicycles often feel unsafe and/or uncomfortable riding in various road conditions. Therefore, understanding the perceptions or experiences of bicyclists in real-world riding conditions is critical to inform interventions that enhance the experience of bike riding and therefore increase participation. A scoping review was undertaken to investigate methods used for capturing subjective experiences in the process of bicycling, or immediately post-ride. Six electronic databases and reference lists of the included studies were searched from inception to May 2021. Of the 11,904 non-duplicate articles, 53 full-text articles were included in the review. The review identified the following methods used to capture the subjective experiences: (i) on-ride method (<em>n</em> = 7), (ii) immediately post-ride method (<em>n</em> = 13), (iii) on-ride plus post-ride methods (<em>n</em> = 8), (iv) ride-along method (<em>n</em> = 4), (v) ride-along plus post-ride methods (<em>n</em> = 6), and (vi) intercept survey methods (<em>n</em> = 15). Some studies exclusively used naturalistic methods for capturing subjective experiences. There is a need to advance methods and standardise approaches to capture subjective user experiences. This is needed to ensure that we are able to understand the experiences and needs of people who ride bikes to inform the provision of safe and connected infrastructure for all ages and abilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 453-477"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164723000405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

People who ride bicycles often feel unsafe and/or uncomfortable riding in various road conditions. Therefore, understanding the perceptions or experiences of bicyclists in real-world riding conditions is critical to inform interventions that enhance the experience of bike riding and therefore increase participation. A scoping review was undertaken to investigate methods used for capturing subjective experiences in the process of bicycling, or immediately post-ride. Six electronic databases and reference lists of the included studies were searched from inception to May 2021. Of the 11,904 non-duplicate articles, 53 full-text articles were included in the review. The review identified the following methods used to capture the subjective experiences: (i) on-ride method (n = 7), (ii) immediately post-ride method (n = 13), (iii) on-ride plus post-ride methods (n = 8), (iv) ride-along method (n = 4), (v) ride-along plus post-ride methods (n = 6), and (vi) intercept survey methods (n = 15). Some studies exclusively used naturalistic methods for capturing subjective experiences. There is a need to advance methods and standardise approaches to capture subjective user experiences. This is needed to ensure that we are able to understand the experiences and needs of people who ride bikes to inform the provision of safe and connected infrastructure for all ages and abilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于捕捉成年人骑自行车时主观用户体验的方法:范围综述
摘要:在各种路况下,骑自行车的人经常感到不安全和/或不舒服。因此,了解骑自行车者在现实骑行条件下的感知或体验,对于提高骑自行车体验从而提高参与度的干预措施至关重要。进行了范围界定审查,以调查在骑自行车过程中或骑行后立即捕捉主观体验的方法。从开始到2021年5月,检索了六个纳入研究的电子数据库和参考文献列表。在11904篇不重复的文章中,53篇全文文章被纳入审查。审查确定了以下用于捕捉主观体验的方法:(i)乘车方法(n = 7) ,(ii)立即骑行后的方法(n = 13) ,(iii)骑行中加骑行后方法(n = 8) ,(iv)乘车方法(n = 4) ,(v)骑行加骑行后方法(n = 6) 和(vi)截距测量方法(n = 15) 。一些研究专门使用自然主义的方法来捕捉主观体验。需要改进方法和标准化方法来捕捉主观用户体验。这是为了确保我们能够了解骑自行车的人的经历和需求,从而为所有年龄和能力的人提供安全和互联的基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting travel in urban America: the socio-technical life of an engineering modeling world Spatial factors associated with usage of different on-demand elements within mobility hubs: a systematic literature review Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here? Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review A survey on reinforcement learning-based control for signalized intersections with connected automated vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1