Anderson Luiz Bezerra Silveira, Lucas Monteiro de Carvalho, Fabrízio Di Masi, Thiago W S Pio, Claudio Melibeu Bentes
{"title":"Blood flow restriction training on hypertesive subjects: a systematic review","authors":"Anderson Luiz Bezerra Silveira, Lucas Monteiro de Carvalho, Fabrízio Di Masi, Thiago W S Pio, Claudio Melibeu Bentes","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Systemic arterial hypertension has been growing worldwide, causing thousands of deaths and large expenses in this condition treatment. Currently, resistance training (RT) is widely prescribed as a non-pharmacological option for blood pressure control, but there are some individuals with intolerance to high load of RT. Hence, blood flow restriction is a method created to stimulate high level of physiological adaptations with low resistive load. However, there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy of this method. Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of blood flow restriction training in hypertensive individuals. Material and method: The research was carried out through a systematic review within the criteria established by the PRISMA statement. Only studies about blood flow restriction in subjects with arterial hypertension were selected in the following databases: MEDLINE/PUBMED, Web of Science, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus. Results: Five studies (4 acute and 1 chronic effects ) met the requirements for the present review, with 77 hypertensive individuals. Only one study presented levels of blood pressure above to the recommended for hypertensive subjects. Conclusion: Even though the number of studies is still insufficient to conclude about the efficacy, the results allow concluding that resistance training with blood flow restriction is a safe alternative of exercise method to hypertensive subjects, especially for those with intolerance to high training loads.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Systemic arterial hypertension has been growing worldwide, causing thousands of deaths and large expenses in this condition treatment. Currently, resistance training (RT) is widely prescribed as a non-pharmacological option for blood pressure control, but there are some individuals with intolerance to high load of RT. Hence, blood flow restriction is a method created to stimulate high level of physiological adaptations with low resistive load. However, there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy of this method. Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of blood flow restriction training in hypertensive individuals. Material and method: The research was carried out through a systematic review within the criteria established by the PRISMA statement. Only studies about blood flow restriction in subjects with arterial hypertension were selected in the following databases: MEDLINE/PUBMED, Web of Science, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus. Results: Five studies (4 acute and 1 chronic effects ) met the requirements for the present review, with 77 hypertensive individuals. Only one study presented levels of blood pressure above to the recommended for hypertensive subjects. Conclusion: Even though the number of studies is still insufficient to conclude about the efficacy, the results allow concluding that resistance training with blood flow restriction is a safe alternative of exercise method to hypertensive subjects, especially for those with intolerance to high training loads.
引言:系统性动脉高压在世界范围内一直在增长,导致数千人死亡,并在这种情况下治疗花费巨大。目前,阻力训练(RT)被广泛认为是控制血压的一种非药物选择,但也有一些人对高负荷的阻力训练不耐受。因此,血流限制是一种在低阻力负荷下刺激高水平生理适应的方法。然而,这种方法的安全性和有效性存在不确定性。目的:本研究旨在探讨高血压患者血流量限制训练的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:该研究是在PRISMA声明确立的标准范围内通过系统审查进行的。在以下数据库中只选择了关于动脉高压受试者血流限制的研究:MEDLINE/PUBMED、Web of Science、SCOPUS和SPORTDiscus。结果:5项研究(4项急性和1项慢性影响)符合本综述的要求,共有77名高血压患者。只有一项研究显示,高血压受试者的血压水平高于推荐水平。结论:尽管研究数量仍不足以得出疗效的结论,但研究结果表明,对于高血压受试者,尤其是对高训练负荷不耐受的受试者来说,限制血流的阻力训练是一种安全的运动方法。