Blood flow restriction training on hypertesive subjects: a systematic review

Q4 Health Professions Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.18176/archmeddeporte.00080
Anderson Luiz Bezerra Silveira, Lucas Monteiro de Carvalho, Fabrízio Di Masi, Thiago W S Pio, Claudio Melibeu Bentes
{"title":"Blood flow restriction training on hypertesive subjects: a systematic review","authors":"Anderson Luiz Bezerra Silveira, Lucas Monteiro de Carvalho, Fabrízio Di Masi, Thiago W S Pio, Claudio Melibeu Bentes","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Systemic arterial hypertension has been growing worldwide, causing thousands of deaths and large expenses in this condition treatment. Currently, resistance training (RT) is widely prescribed as a non-pharmacological option for blood pressure control, but there are some individuals with intolerance to high load of RT. Hence, blood flow restriction is a method created to stimulate high level of physiological adaptations with low resistive load. However, there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy of this method. Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of blood flow restriction training in hypertensive individuals. Material and method: The research was carried out through a systematic review within the criteria established by the PRISMA statement. Only studies about blood flow restriction in subjects with arterial hypertension were selected in the following databases: MEDLINE/PUBMED, Web of Science, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus. Results: Five studies (4 acute and 1 chronic effects ) met the requirements for the present review, with 77 hypertensive individuals. Only one study presented levels of blood pressure above to the recommended for hypertensive subjects. Conclusion: Even though the number of studies is still insufficient to conclude about the efficacy, the results allow concluding that resistance training with blood flow restriction is a safe alternative of exercise method to hypertensive subjects, especially for those with intolerance to high training loads.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic arterial hypertension has been growing worldwide, causing thousands of deaths and large expenses in this condition treatment. Currently, resistance training (RT) is widely prescribed as a non-pharmacological option for blood pressure control, but there are some individuals with intolerance to high load of RT. Hence, blood flow restriction is a method created to stimulate high level of physiological adaptations with low resistive load. However, there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy of this method. Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of blood flow restriction training in hypertensive individuals. Material and method: The research was carried out through a systematic review within the criteria established by the PRISMA statement. Only studies about blood flow restriction in subjects with arterial hypertension were selected in the following databases: MEDLINE/PUBMED, Web of Science, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus. Results: Five studies (4 acute and 1 chronic effects ) met the requirements for the present review, with 77 hypertensive individuals. Only one study presented levels of blood pressure above to the recommended for hypertensive subjects. Conclusion: Even though the number of studies is still insufficient to conclude about the efficacy, the results allow concluding that resistance training with blood flow restriction is a safe alternative of exercise method to hypertensive subjects, especially for those with intolerance to high training loads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压患者血流量限制训练的系统评价
引言:系统性动脉高压在世界范围内一直在增长,导致数千人死亡,并在这种情况下治疗花费巨大。目前,阻力训练(RT)被广泛认为是控制血压的一种非药物选择,但也有一些人对高负荷的阻力训练不耐受。因此,血流限制是一种在低阻力负荷下刺激高水平生理适应的方法。然而,这种方法的安全性和有效性存在不确定性。目的:本研究旨在探讨高血压患者血流量限制训练的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:该研究是在PRISMA声明确立的标准范围内通过系统审查进行的。在以下数据库中只选择了关于动脉高压受试者血流限制的研究:MEDLINE/PUBMED、Web of Science、SCOPUS和SPORTDiscus。结果:5项研究(4项急性和1项慢性影响)符合本综述的要求,共有77名高血压患者。只有一项研究显示,高血压受试者的血压水平高于推荐水平。结论:尽管研究数量仍不足以得出疗效的结论,但研究结果表明,对于高血压受试者,尤其是对高训练负荷不耐受的受试者来说,限制血流的阻力训练是一种安全的运动方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of maximal oxygen uptake pre- and post-COVID-19 in elite footballers in Argentina A systematic review on the application of Aikido as a psychosomatic tool in therapeutic setting (Part I) The pre-participation physical evaluation: fact or fiction? Adductor functionality and strength in high-level rink hockey players Hemodynamic and motion demands of soccer referees: a comparison between series A and B of the State Championship of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1