A temple to transnational queerness: the politics of commemorating Oscar Wilde

IF 0.7 4区 文学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES European Journal of English Studies Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/13825577.2020.1844415
C. Valentine
{"title":"A temple to transnational queerness: the politics of commemorating Oscar Wilde","authors":"C. Valentine","doi":"10.1080/13825577.2020.1844415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent years have seen a noted divergence between academic and commemorative treatments of Oscar Wilde. Both have placed the transnational and queer dimensions of Wilde’s identity at the fore, but scholars have also emphasised its orientalist and imperialist facets, while artists and devotees has pared down those less palatable qualities. This paper takes one tribute – Peter McGough and David McDermott’s Oscar Wilde Temple (2017–2019) – as a case study to explore the politics of queer commemoration. By first situating the Temple in a history of Wilde commemorations, I define a set of selection criteria on which any such monument must arbitrate. I then use those criteria to close read the Temple’s iconography, attending to representations of queer, Catholic, and Irish identity before addressing the politics of canonising Wilde given his participation in systems of colonial and racial injustice. Instead of grounds to dismiss Wilde’s art and its contemporary supporters, I take those politics as a challenge to imagine more critical and intersectional approaches to queer commemoration. My conclusion turns from theory to praxis to explore how models of queer myth-making and counterpublics might be concretised to develop such alternatives.","PeriodicalId":43819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"146 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825577.2020.1844415","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2020.1844415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent years have seen a noted divergence between academic and commemorative treatments of Oscar Wilde. Both have placed the transnational and queer dimensions of Wilde’s identity at the fore, but scholars have also emphasised its orientalist and imperialist facets, while artists and devotees has pared down those less palatable qualities. This paper takes one tribute – Peter McGough and David McDermott’s Oscar Wilde Temple (2017–2019) – as a case study to explore the politics of queer commemoration. By first situating the Temple in a history of Wilde commemorations, I define a set of selection criteria on which any such monument must arbitrate. I then use those criteria to close read the Temple’s iconography, attending to representations of queer, Catholic, and Irish identity before addressing the politics of canonising Wilde given his participation in systems of colonial and racial injustice. Instead of grounds to dismiss Wilde’s art and its contemporary supporters, I take those politics as a challenge to imagine more critical and intersectional approaches to queer commemoration. My conclusion turns from theory to praxis to explore how models of queer myth-making and counterpublics might be concretised to develop such alternatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国酷儿的圣殿:纪念奥斯卡·王尔德的政治
近年来,学术界对奥斯卡·王尔德的评价和纪念性评价出现了明显的分歧。两者都把王尔德身份的跨国和怪异维度放在了首位,但学者们也强调了它的东方主义和帝国主义方面,而艺术家和信徒们则淡化了这些不那么令人愉快的品质。本文以彼得·麦高夫和大卫·麦克德莫特的《奥斯卡·王尔德神庙》(2017-2019)为例,探讨酷儿纪念的政治。首先,我将这座神庙置于王尔德纪念活动的历史中,我定义了一套选择标准,任何这样的纪念碑都必须根据这些标准进行仲裁。然后,我用这些标准来结束阅读圣殿的肖像,关注酷儿,天主教徒和爱尔兰身份的代表,然后讨论王尔德的政治,因为他参与了殖民和种族不公正的制度。我不是以此为理由来驳斥王尔德的艺术及其当代支持者,而是把这些政治作为一种挑战,去想象更批判性和交叉性的方式来纪念酷儿。我的结论从理论转向实践,探索如何将酷儿神话制造和反公众的模式具体化,以发展出这样的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Reading transformations: from David Garnett’s Lady into Fox (1922) to Sarah Hall’s “Mrs Fox” (2013) The mind is all the animals it has attended: limitrophy and porous borders in the poetry of Robert Bringhurst Root identity–relation identity in Inga Simpson’s Understory: a life with trees Deconstructing human-canine relations in Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs Hospitality and liminality in the time of the Anthropocene: Jenn Ashworth’s Fell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1