Vibrotactile Perception Thresholds following Short-Term Exposure to Hand–Arm Vibration: Application for Identifying Potential Workers at Risk of Neurosensory Disorders

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Vibration Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.3390/vibration5040047
N. Shibata
{"title":"Vibrotactile Perception Thresholds following Short-Term Exposure to Hand–Arm Vibration: Application for Identifying Potential Workers at Risk of Neurosensory Disorders","authors":"N. Shibata","doi":"10.3390/vibration5040047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to propose and validate a novel indicator that characterizes the potential effects of exposure to hand–arm vibration (HAV) and evaluates the increasing risk of neurosensory components of hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). The author focused on a quantity calculated from ascending and descending thresholds and residual shifts in vibrotactile perception thresholds (VPTs) observed at the fingertips in the recovery process after exposure to HAV. Methods: Thirty subjects—10 old exposed (G1), 10 old non-exposed (G2), and 10 young non-exposed subjects (G3)—were required to perform a series of grip tasks with exposure to two intensities of HAV, which was followed by 90 s of vibration perception measurements at the tip of each subject’s right index finger. Vibrotactile perception was measured every 5 min for 30 min. Results: Mean differences between ascending and descending thresholds (VPTWs) for G2 and G3 remained nearly unchanged over time after exposure to HAV. In contrast, the mean VPTWs for G1 gradually increased over time after exposure to HAV. The mean VPTWs for G1 were always larger than those for G2 and G3. TTS recovery was observed at 125 Hz under both of the HAV exposure conditions in each group. TTSs of nearly zero were observed for the low-HAV condition in G3. TTS recovery after exposure to HAV was not observed at 31.5 Hz in any of the subject groups. Regardless of elapsed time, the mean TTSs for G2 and G3 were smaller than those for G1. Negative TTS values showing a lower TTS than the baseline were sometimes observed for the low-HAV condition in G3. Conclusions: VPTWs can be a screening parameter that detects potential patients with only neurosensory components observed as an early sign of HAVS.","PeriodicalId":75301,"journal":{"name":"Vibration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vibration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration5040047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to propose and validate a novel indicator that characterizes the potential effects of exposure to hand–arm vibration (HAV) and evaluates the increasing risk of neurosensory components of hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). The author focused on a quantity calculated from ascending and descending thresholds and residual shifts in vibrotactile perception thresholds (VPTs) observed at the fingertips in the recovery process after exposure to HAV. Methods: Thirty subjects—10 old exposed (G1), 10 old non-exposed (G2), and 10 young non-exposed subjects (G3)—were required to perform a series of grip tasks with exposure to two intensities of HAV, which was followed by 90 s of vibration perception measurements at the tip of each subject’s right index finger. Vibrotactile perception was measured every 5 min for 30 min. Results: Mean differences between ascending and descending thresholds (VPTWs) for G2 and G3 remained nearly unchanged over time after exposure to HAV. In contrast, the mean VPTWs for G1 gradually increased over time after exposure to HAV. The mean VPTWs for G1 were always larger than those for G2 and G3. TTS recovery was observed at 125 Hz under both of the HAV exposure conditions in each group. TTSs of nearly zero were observed for the low-HAV condition in G3. TTS recovery after exposure to HAV was not observed at 31.5 Hz in any of the subject groups. Regardless of elapsed time, the mean TTSs for G2 and G3 were smaller than those for G1. Negative TTS values showing a lower TTS than the baseline were sometimes observed for the low-HAV condition in G3. Conclusions: VPTWs can be a screening parameter that detects potential patients with only neurosensory components observed as an early sign of HAVS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短期暴露于手臂振动后的可控振动感知阈值:识别潜在神经感觉障碍工人的应用
背景:本研究的目的是提出并验证一种新的指标,该指标表征暴露于手臂振动(HAV)的潜在影响,并评估手臂振动综合征(HAVS)神经感觉成分的风险增加。作者重点研究了在暴露于HAV后的恢复过程中,根据指尖观察到的振动触觉感知阈值(VPT)的上升和下降阈值以及残余位移计算的量。方法:30名受试者——10名老年暴露者(G1)、10名老年非暴露者(G2)和10名年轻非暴露受试者(G3)——被要求在暴露于两种强度的HAV的情况下进行一系列抓握任务,然后在每个受试者的右食指指尖进行90 s的振动感知测量。每5分钟测量一次振动感受,持续30分钟。结果:暴露于HAV后,G2和G3的上升阈值和下降阈值(VPTWs)之间的平均差异随着时间的推移几乎保持不变。相反,G1的平均VPTWs在暴露于HAV后随着时间的推移逐渐增加。G1组的平均VPTW总是大于G2和G3组的平均。在两种HAV暴露条件下,每组在125Hz下观察到TTS恢复。在G3的低HAV条件下观察到几乎为零的TTS。在任何受试者组中,在31.5Hz下均未观察到暴露于HAV后TTS的恢复。不管经过的时间如何,G2和G3的平均TTS都小于G1。对于G3中的低HAV情况,有时观察到显示TTS低于基线的负TTS值。结论:VPTWs可以作为一个筛选参数,用于检测仅观察到作为HAVS早期体征的神经感觉成分的潜在患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Study of Seating Suspension System Vibration Isolation Using a Hybrid Method of an Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Modelling Evaluating Contact-Less Sensing and Fault Diagnosis Characteristics in Vibrating Thin Cantilever Beams with a MetGlas® 2826MB Ribbon A Testbench for Measuring the Dynamic Force-Displacement Characteristics of Shockmounts Study on Fluid–Structure Interaction of a Camber Morphing Wing Study on Lateral Vibration of Tail Coach for High-Speed Train under Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1