Leveraging ChatGPT to aid patient education on coronary angiogram.

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023138
Samuel Ji Quan Koh, Khung Keong Yeo, Jonathan Jiunn-Liang Yap
{"title":"Leveraging ChatGPT to aid patient education on coronary angiogram.","authors":"Samuel Ji Quan Koh, Khung Keong Yeo, Jonathan Jiunn-Liang Yap","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural-language artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising technological advancement poised to revolutionise the delivery of healthcare. We aim to explore the quality of ChatGPT in providing medical information regarding a common cardiology procedure-the coronary angiogram-and evaluating the potential opportunities and challenges of patient education through this natural-language AI model in the broader context. In a conversational manner, we asked ChatGPT common questions about undergoing a coronary angiogram according to the areas of: description of procedure, indications, contraindications, complications, alternatives, and follow-up. The strengths of the answers given by ChatGPT were that they were generally presented in a comprehensive and systematic fashion, covering most of the major information fields that are required. However, there were certain deficiencies in its responses. These include occasional factual inaccuracies, significant omissions, inaccurate assumptions, and lack of flexibility in recommendations beyond the line of questioning, resulting in the answers being focused solely on the topic. We would expect an increasing number of patients who may choose to seek information about their health through these platforms given their accessibility and perceived reliability. Consequently, it is prudent for healthcare professionals to be cognisant of both the strengths and deficiencies of such models. While these models appear to be good adjuncts for patients to obtain information, they cannot replace the role of a healthcare provider in delivering personalised health advice and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50774,"journal":{"name":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural-language artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising technological advancement poised to revolutionise the delivery of healthcare. We aim to explore the quality of ChatGPT in providing medical information regarding a common cardiology procedure-the coronary angiogram-and evaluating the potential opportunities and challenges of patient education through this natural-language AI model in the broader context. In a conversational manner, we asked ChatGPT common questions about undergoing a coronary angiogram according to the areas of: description of procedure, indications, contraindications, complications, alternatives, and follow-up. The strengths of the answers given by ChatGPT were that they were generally presented in a comprehensive and systematic fashion, covering most of the major information fields that are required. However, there were certain deficiencies in its responses. These include occasional factual inaccuracies, significant omissions, inaccurate assumptions, and lack of flexibility in recommendations beyond the line of questioning, resulting in the answers being focused solely on the topic. We would expect an increasing number of patients who may choose to seek information about their health through these platforms given their accessibility and perceived reliability. Consequently, it is prudent for healthcare professionals to be cognisant of both the strengths and deficiencies of such models. While these models appear to be good adjuncts for patients to obtain information, they cannot replace the role of a healthcare provider in delivering personalised health advice and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用ChatGPT帮助患者进行冠状动脉造影教育
自然语言人工智能(AI)是一项很有前途的技术进步,有望彻底改变医疗保健的提供方式。我们的目标是探索ChatGPT在提供关于常见心脏病学程序(冠状动脉血管造影)的医疗信息方面的质量,并通过这种自然语言人工智能模型在更广泛的背景下评估患者教育的潜在机遇和挑战。以对话的方式,我们向ChatGPT询问了关于接受冠状动脉造影的常见问题,包括:手术描述、适应症、禁忌症、并发症、替代方案和随访。ChatGPT给出的答案的优势在于,它们通常以全面和系统的方式呈现,涵盖了所需的大多数主要信息领域。但是,它的反应有某些不足之处。这些问题包括偶尔的事实不准确,重大遗漏,不准确的假设,以及在问题范围之外的建议缺乏灵活性,导致答案只关注主题。考虑到这些平台的可访问性和可感知的可靠性,我们预计会有越来越多的患者选择通过这些平台寻求有关他们健康的信息。因此,对于医疗保健专业人员来说,认识到这些模型的优点和缺点是谨慎的。虽然这些模式似乎是患者获取信息的良好辅助手段,但它们不能取代医疗保健提供者在提供个性化健康建议和管理方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals is the official journal of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. Established in 1972, Annals is the leading medical journal in Singapore which aims to publish novel findings from clinical research as well as medical practices that can benefit the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Singapore’s Experience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Key Lessons from the Ground COVID-19: The virus, vaccine and paediatric heart Cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 in children Long COVID prevalence, risk factors and impact of vaccination in the paediatric population: a survey study in Singapore Association of quality-of-care indicators with asthma outcomes: An observational study for asthma care in Singapore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1