Identifying Context-Specific Categories for Visualizing Livability of Cities—a Case Study of Malmö

Pub Date : 2018-11-05 DOI:10.12924/CIS2018.06010052
Kyoko Takahashi, S. Kudo, Eigo Tateishi, Norikazu Furukawa, Joakim Nordqvist, D. Allasiw
{"title":"Identifying Context-Specific Categories for Visualizing Livability of Cities—a Case Study of Malmö","authors":"Kyoko Takahashi, S. Kudo, Eigo Tateishi, Norikazu Furukawa, Joakim Nordqvist, D. Allasiw","doi":"10.12924/CIS2018.06010052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Livability is a concept being applied to cities, even though it is vague. Worldwide, there are several livable city ranking schemes in use, which compare the livability of cities by making use of standardized indicator sets. The research presented here recognizes, as a point of departure, that each city is unique, implying that comparisons of cities by standardized categories only does not adequately reflect the reality of each city. A qualitative approach to identify context-specific categories of livability is proposed and employed to the case of Malmo in Sweden. Through interviews, nine context-specific categories were identified and visualized. The findings of the study demonstrate that a qualitative approach enables a more in-depth description of livability categories because it can capture and illustrate relationships among the categories. An explicit awareness of such relationships may provide a more holistic perspective to city officials and planners as they aim to improve the livability of their cities. The study concludes that a qualitative approach in identifying context-specific categories can complement existing assessment schemes and allow a better grasp of livability challenges to cities.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/CIS2018.06010052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Livability is a concept being applied to cities, even though it is vague. Worldwide, there are several livable city ranking schemes in use, which compare the livability of cities by making use of standardized indicator sets. The research presented here recognizes, as a point of departure, that each city is unique, implying that comparisons of cities by standardized categories only does not adequately reflect the reality of each city. A qualitative approach to identify context-specific categories of livability is proposed and employed to the case of Malmo in Sweden. Through interviews, nine context-specific categories were identified and visualized. The findings of the study demonstrate that a qualitative approach enables a more in-depth description of livability categories because it can capture and illustrate relationships among the categories. An explicit awareness of such relationships may provide a more holistic perspective to city officials and planners as they aim to improve the livability of their cities. The study concludes that a qualitative approach in identifying context-specific categories can complement existing assessment schemes and allow a better grasp of livability challenges to cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
确定城市宜居性可视化的特定环境类别-以Malmö为例
宜居性是一个应用于城市的概念,尽管它很模糊。在世界范围内,有几种宜居城市排名方案正在使用,它们通过使用标准化指标集来比较城市的宜居性。这里提出的研究认识到,作为出发点,每个城市都是独特的,这意味着仅按标准化类别对城市进行比较并不能充分反映每个城市的现实。提出了一种定性方法来确定特定环境下的宜居性类别,并将其应用于瑞典马尔默的案例。通过访谈,确定并可视化了九个特定于具体情况的类别。研究结果表明,定性方法能够更深入地描述宜居性类别,因为它可以捕捉和说明类别之间的关系。对这种关系的明确认识可能会为城市官员和规划者提供更全面的视角,因为他们的目标是提高城市的宜居性。该研究得出结论,在确定特定环境类别时采用定性方法可以补充现有的评估方案,并更好地了解城市的宜居性挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1